View Full Version: Smolinski,William 24 Aug 2004

Porchlight International for the Missing & Unidentified > Missing Persons Cases 2004 > Smolinski,William 24 Aug 2004

Pages: [1] 2


Title: Smolinski,William 24 Aug 2004
Description: Waterbury,Connecticut


oldies4mari2004 - May 19, 2006 03:38 PM (GMT)
Missing Man Mystery in Waterbury
May 19, 2006 09:04 AM EDT Video Headlines

Missing Man Mystery in Waterbury


WATERBURY -- A local man from Waterbury has been missing for nearly two years, and his parents say someone is trying stop them from finding out what happened to their son.

Billy Smolinski's parents have taken video that they say proves someone is trying to slow down the investigation.

Eyewitness News has also learned that tracking dogs will return to the place Smolinski was last seen alive.

Smolinski's family believes he was murdered. But with few facts and no evidence or eyewitnesses the case has come to a screeching halt.

Smolinski was last seen at his Waterbury home on August 24, 2004.



"There's not a day that goes by that I don't think about it," says his father William Smolinski. "Going to work, coming home...it's tough."

Billy told a neighbor he was going up north to look at a car and asked him to let out his dog Harley, he'd leave a key.

When the neighbor didn't find a key or Billy he called a friend.

Billy's truck was parked at the end of his driveway. Inside were his wallet and keys.

"When the neighbor called his girlfriend of eight years because there was no key we knew there was a problem," says Janice Smolinski, Billy's mother. "We called police and said he was missing."

Police would not classify him as missing for three days.



"We did a thorough search of his home," says Chris Corbett of Waterbury Police. "There were no physical signs of a disturbance at the home. There were a number of events that had occurred in his life including a break up with a girlfriend also the loss of his job. There is no sign of foul play and by that I mean no physical signs of evidence and no witnesses."

Neighbors John and Elaine Ramsey remember that week.



"We'd been on vacation and I came home and Billy was over there stripping paint off the side of the house and he'd been doing that for about three days and then I didn't see him," said John Ramsey.

Billy had just returned from a trip to Florida where the family suspects he had found out his girlfriend was cheating on him.

"That's why there's so much more to this case than just 'Billy missing,'" Janice says.

The I-Team has learned that the day Billy disappeared he left a threatening message on the answering machine of the other man. Police confirm they have a tape, but aren't saying who the took it from.



"As part of the investigation we took custody of a tape recording from an answering machine and we have that as evidence," says Corbett

Billy's family started hanging missing posters and they were stunned at what they happened next.



"They pull up behind our car and rip them down right in front of us," said William Smolinski

They say it was Billy's ex-girlfriend tearing down the posters. The family has video of what appears Madeline Gleason and another woman tearing down the signs.



"We were hanging flyers in Woodbridge and they were constantly being torn down sliced slashed," said Janice Smolinski.

And, then another twist as Woodbridge police arrested Billy's mother for trespassing for putting up a missing poster on a poll. You can see it's been torn down but a piece of it remains.


In the arrest affidavit. Mrs. Smolinski was charged with trespassing and disorderly conduct, charges the state's attorney would later drop.

The I-team tried many times to contact Gleason, but were told to come back to her house 'another time.'



Police tell the I-Team they are entering a new phase of the investigation. Later this month K-9's will comb the woods behind Billy's house, searching for clues.


The Smolinskis believe there is someone out there who knows what happened to their son, and they are offering a $15,000 reward for information leading to an arrest.

Anyone with information to call the Waterbury police department.

NOTE: After several unsuccessful attempts to contact Madeline Gleason, I-Team reporter Diana Rocco was able to get in touch with Gleason's attorney -- John Williams -- Seven hours before this story aired. He hung up on us and has not returned calls for comment.

http://www.wfsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=4925242

oldies4mari2004 - September 30, 2006 09:30 PM (GMT)
http://www.charleyproject.org/cases/s/smolinski_william.html

William Paul Smolinski Jr.



Above Images: Smolinski, circa 2004


Vital Statistics at Time of Disappearance

Missing Since: August 24, 2004 from Waterbury, Connecticut
Classification: Endangered Missing
Date Of Birth: January 14, 1973
Age: 31 years old
Height and Weight: 5'11 - 6'0, 200 pounds
Distinguishing Characteristics: Caucasian male. Light brown hair, blue eyes. Smolinski's nicknames are Bill and Billy. He is bowlegged and his left ear is pierced. He has a tattoo of a blue cross outined in orange on his left shoulder, and a tattoo of a cross with the name "Pruitt" inside on his right forearm. Smolinski's hair was in a crew cut at the time of his disappearance. He wears size 10 1/2 shoes, size 36-32 pants, and size large or extra-large shirts.
Clothing/Jewelry Description: A small diamond earring, a gold chain rope-style necklace with a cross pendant, and possibly blue jeans, a blue denim shirt, and work boots.
Medical Conditions: Smolinski is allergic to shellfish. He has no other medical conditions and was in good physical and mental health at the time of his disappearance.


Details of Disappearance

Smolinski was last seen at his residence in the vicinity of the 100 block of Holly Street in Waterbury, Connecticut between 3:30 and 3:45 p.m. on August 24, 2004. He went to a neighbor's residence and asked her to take care of his German Shepherd dog, as he was leaving for three days to see about a car. He was supposed to give his keys to her so she could go inside and feed the animal, but he never did. Smolinksi has never been heard from again. All of his personal belongings, including his white late 1970s or early 1980s Ford pickup truck were left behind. His wallet and keys were inside the truck.
Smolinski broke up with his girlfriend of one year shortly before his disappearance, but his loved ones stated that he did not seem to be bothered by this. His ex-girlfriend is not considered a suspect in his case. Smolinski has no history of drug use and no police record, and he drinks only on a social basis. He held several jobs at the time of his disappearance: he worked for Midland Heating and Air Conditioning full time, had a part-time job with Durable Towing, and mowed lawns and plowed driveways for side income. He was considered a dependable worker and had just been offered extra hours at one of his jobs after being laid off at another job.

Smolinski deposited most of his last paycheck in the bank prior to his disappearance; his bank accounts have not been accessed since then. At the time of his disappearance, he was prepping his house to be painted. His parents paid off his mortgage after his disappearance and are currently renting his house out while they await his return. His Social Security number has not been used since his disappearance.

Authorities have not found any indication that foul play was involved in Smolinski's disappearance and they believe he may have left of his own accord, but his family fears for his safety as he rarely travels anywhere and it is uncharacteristic of him to leave without warning. He enjoys fishing, driving in demolition derbies, and riding snowmobiles. He studied auto mechanics at Naugatuck Valley Community College for one year and had considered a career in law enforcement. Smolinski's case remains unsolved.



Investigating Agency
If you have any information concerning this case, please contact:
Waterbury Police Department
203-574-6941



Source Information
The National Center for Missing Adults
Billy's Guiding Light of Hope
WTNH News
The Republican-American



Updated 2 times since October 12, 2004.

Last updated September 23, 2005; details of disappearance updated.

Charley Project Home

oldies4mari2004 - October 2, 2006 02:19 AM (GMT)
FBI steps in to help in case of missing man
October 1, 2006, 2:58 PM EDT


WATERBURY, Conn. (AP) _ The FBI has agreed to help Waterbury police in the case of a man who vanished more than two years ago.

Billy Smolinski was 31 years old when he disappeared in August 2004 after asking a neighbor to look after his dog while he took a three-day trip to look at a car.

City police say their investigation has hit a dead end and hope federal authorities can help solve the mystery.

"We feel we did all we can do from the local perspective," Police Superintendent Neil O'Leary said. "The case was investigated as thoroughly as it could be."

Waterbury police asked for the FBI's help in August, requesting a joint local-federal investigation.

"It is our belief there is a likelihood of foul play involved in the disappearance of Mr. Smolinski," Deputy Police Chief James Nardozzi wrote in a letter to a Connecticut FBI official. "However in our quest to locate Mr. Smolinski we also believe we have exhausted all avenues of investigation available to us."

O'Leary said Saturday that police have never ruled out foul play in Smolinski's disappearance, but local authorities have never said definitively that it was a factor.

"One of the three things happened," O'Leary said. "He may have disappeared on his own accord and, hopefully, he is alive and well. There may have been foul play; someone may have harmed him and that's why he is missing. Or he may have disappeared and took his own life."

Members of Smolinski's family have been frustrated with the investigation, saying city police have ignored their concerns. They have also accused police of being negligent and careless in attempts to solve the case.

His family has repeatedly spoken to the FBI, put up posters of him and contacted a private investigator.

The private investigator, Andy Thibault, asked for Waterbury police's file on the case under Freedom of Information laws. The state's Freedom of Information Commission ruled last week that police must turn over the documents within a week. The commission will decide which papers can be released.

Smolinski's mother, Janice Smolinski, said she hopes the FBI can help locate her son.

"Whether the FBI's participation will help remains to be seen," she said. "We've heard many promises that never came through."





http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/con...n-apconnecticut

monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:30 PM (GMT)
This is an actual photograph taken of one of the four white doves released at Billy’s one year Vigil on August 21, 2005. The doves symbolized Faith, Hope, Love and Peace. Paula released one dove for her brother Billy. Grace, Billy’s Aunt released a dove for Beau Ramsey missing from Benton, Arkansas, whose remains were found in May 2005. Bruce, Billy’s Uncle released a dove for a close neighborhood family friend and Billy’s lifetime best friend Chris Pruitt who passed away ten years ago. The fourth dove was released by Deacon Tom Clifford of Saint Hedwig’s Church for his son who passed away in October 2004. The dove in the photograph flew up to this light/flag pole and perched there for the longest time. Eventually when the last of the live news vans and the last few people were leaving the Naugatuck Green, this particular white dove then left its perch and glided overhead across the green

monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:32 PM (GMT)
Missing: August 24, 2004

Age now: 33 Years Old

Sex: Male

Race: White

Hair: Light Brown

Eyes: Blue

Height: 6’0”

Weight: 200 lbs.

Missing From: Waterbury, CT USA



TATTOO’S: A tattoo of a blue cross with the name Pruitt in the cross on left forearm, a tattoo of a blue cross with an orange outline on right shoulder. His left ear is pierced with a small diamond.

http://www.justice4billy.com/

William Smolinski, Jr.

a.k.a. Bill or Billy
741 days, 21 hours, 26 minutes, and 2 seconds Since we have seen WilliamThis Vigil Candle burns to Remember Billy's Two Year Missing Anniversary and will continue to burn until he is found.

If you have any information about Billy (NCIC # M244309427)

Please Contact The Waterbury Police Department at: 203-574-6911



Please e-mail confidential information to: info@justice4billy.com



Please mail confidential information to:

P.O. Box 123, Cheshire CT. 06410


monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:34 PM (GMT)
http://cooljustice.blogspot.com/2006/10/sm...hat-fbi-is.html

Smolinski Family Relieved That FBI Is Involved

Lost Faith In Waterbury PD

By John Murray
Waterbury Observer
October 2006

In January 2005, four months after Billy Smolinski disappeared, his family
contacted FBI offices in New Haven. Deeply dissatisfied at the efforts of the
Waterbury Police Department, Jan and Bill Smolinski reached out for federal
assistance in trying to unravel the mystery of what happened to their 31 year old
son.

The family knew Billy had been involved in a love triangle, and that his male rival
was an elected official in Woodbridge. The family also knew that Billy had left a
threatening phone message on the politician’s answering machine on the day he
disappeared.

Inexplicable and mysterious circumstances swirled around the case, yet the
Smolinskis couldn’t get Waterbury detectives to take Billy’s disappearance
seriously. A Waterbury police officer told the Observer in March 2006 that Billy was
probably having a beer somewhere in Europe. Comments like that infuriated the
Smolinski family. They are convinced Billy is dead, yet the Waterbury police
continued to state they suspected no foul play in Billy’s disappearance.
Jan Smolinski’s first attempt to get the FBI involved went nowhere, but she is
determined to find out what happened to her son, and she called back a second
and third time.

“The fourth time I called the woman was very nice to me, but she sternly told me
that the FBI was dealing with Homeland Security, and didn’t get involved in missing
person cases,” Jan Smolinski said. “I was told to deal with my local police
department.”

But when she discovered that the Waterbury Police Department had lost three
DNA samples in the case, Jan Smolinski called FBI Headquarters in Virginia. She
received assurances that if state officials didn’t provide help in getting DNA
samples into regional and national data banks, that the FBI would help.

Attempts to get help from state officials was rebuffed with the all too familiar,
and frustrating, “you have to deal with your local police.”

Finally, back in July, the Smolinskis went down to FBI offices in New Haven to give
DNA samples. While they were there they left behind long feature articles that had
been published in the Waterbury Observer detailing the bizarre circumstances
surrounding Billy’s disappearance, and the sluggish investigation by Waterbury
detectives. The police work in the case was so sloppy that it was either a bungled
investigation, or perhaps there was a connection between Woodbridge and
Waterbury.

At the end of the visit the Smolinskis were informed that the articles would be
passed along to an agent. The family said they were told that they wouldn’t know if
an agent was actively investigating the case or not. They said they were told the FBI likes to work quietly.

Weeks later, on July 28th, Andy Thibault requested information regarding the
case from the Waterbury Police Department. His request was denied. But Thibault,
an experienced investigative journalist, and a former Freedom of Information (FOI)
commissioner, was keen enough to petition for a hearing in Hartford that jammed
a spotlight on the efforts of the Waterbury police. The department was forced to
release information about the love triangle, or prove that they were conducting an
active investigation.

That same day, the Waterbury police sent a letter to the FBI requesting help in
the case.

In the FOI hearing the police produced a copy of the letter to the FBI as proof
that they were still investigating the case. The FOI was unconvinced, and has asked
the police to produce a file containing information about the love triangle.

It was at the hearing that it first became public knowledge that the Waterbury PD
was asking the FBI for help. But some are already questioning the motives of the
Waterbury PD. There appears to be solid indicators that the FBI was already
investigating the case before Waterbury PD sent the letter.

The Smolinskis had met with the FBI weeks before the letter was sent.

“The Waterbury police are taking a bow for calling in the FBI,” Jan Smolinski said,
“but if they had investigated this case like they should have from the very
beginning we might already have our answers.”

After the FOI hearing the news that the FBI was being called onto the case spread
across the state. The Hartford Courant did a story, the Republican-American,
Channel 8 news, Channel 3 and Channel 61 all did pieces. Then USA Today ran a
small piece that circulated around the country, and across the world. CBS News
called the Smolinskis.

“All of a sudden there is a media frenzy,” Jan Smolinski said. “And it’s because
the FBI is involved. We’ve been crying for help for two years and almost everybody
has pushed us aside. Having the FBI take a look at Billy’s case is a breath of fresh
air. Maybe they are the answer to the chaos we’ve been dealing with.”

Background in archives includes:

WATERBURY PD DELIVERS SMOLINSKI MISSING PERSON LOVE TRIANGLE FILE TO FOI COMMISSION
Oct. 6, 2006

monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:35 PM (GMT)
http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?s=5488000

FBI to investigate local missing persons case



(WTNH, Oct. 2, 2006 10:30 PM) _ A missing persons case that turned cold has now gotten the attention of the FBI.

The agency has been called in to help uncover new leads in the disappearance of Billy Smolinski.

by News Channel 8's Jamie Muro
For two years, the family of Billy Smolinski have wondered what happened to him. He simply disappeared but this week there was a bit of good news when the Smolinskis learned their case is getting some high-powered help in the form of the FBI.

31-year-old Billy Smolinski was last seen in August of 2004. He vanished after asking a neighbor to look after his dog in his Waterbury home on Holly Street. He said he was going to look for a car, but left his truck, keys, and wallet.

Now the FBI has agreed to help Waterbury Police piece together the story of what happened.

Janice and Bill Smolinski learned of the FBI's involvement this week, and are optimistic many questions will be answered.

Janice Smolinski, mother, says,"Finally, the FBI. I can't believe, it's really a happy moment. Maybe we can get our answers. We were told once the FBI catches on, they don't let go."

monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:36 PM (GMT)

monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:39 PM (GMT)
http://theroguejournal.com/stories/much-to...too-little.html

Much Too Little...
And Far, Far Too Late
By Bill Dusty
08-19-2006







There is a uniqueness in every story of a missing person - an individual sadness that every family member and friend goes through. This is true because the missing person is not just a mere statistic. He or she is a human life like no other: a daughter, a son, a parent, a sibling, and a friend. And in reading about each person gone missing, you can discover the unique life that each person once lead. Every one of them was a special person. They had their own favorite television shows, favorite foods, and their own little quirks and peculiarities that made them so very different from everyone else.

Then there comes the sudden loss. The phone calls. The questions. Where is he today? Is she back from her friend's house? This is the part of each story that is hauntingly the same. Every family member, every friend, expects to see their loved-one soon - the next day or the next week. But they are suddenly gone. Taken away from them. Forever. Were they in an accident? Are they lost and in trouble? Were they abducted? What could have possibly happened to them?

In many of these missing persons cases, these questions are never fully answered. And unfortunately, in a few of those unsolved cases, there is another troubling similarity that often comes to light: the seeming indifference and/or incompetence of those who are entrusted to investigate them. It may be a perceived indifference or it may be real, but it is without question noticeably felt among many of the families and friends of those gone missing. In some of these cases, too, there seems to be a tendency by law enforcement to want to explain away the missing person: he or she lived a risky lifestyle; he or she may have been suicidal and gone off somewhere; or they may have left on their own, to begin life a-new. But it is also noticeable that in many of these unsolved missing persons cases, critical evidence gathering - timely and on the scene - was either badly executed or simply not done at all.

The most critical time in a missing person's investigation is the very first day or two that the person is reported missing. Yet it is this very time period that seems to pass with little or no action taken at all. Apparently, the feeling is that most of these reports are false alarms, and that resources should not be expended until the person is verified as truly missing. And it is true that many missing persons cases can be false alarms: the person has simply gone off without telling anybody, and he subsequently turns up unharmed. But not in most cases, because most people will first attempt to find their loved-one on their own. Few people take the knee-jerk reaction of notifying the authorities without first making phone calls or attempting to track down their loved-one on their own. And so, in many of these cases, a day or two has already gone by before the police are even aware of the missing person. And then there is the circumstance where evidence at the scene clearly indicates foul play. In these cases, no time at all should pass before a police investigation begins. But curiously, in many cases, this is not what happens.


THE CASE OF BILLY SMOLINSKI:
Billy Smolinski, of Waterbury, CT, was a fit 31-year-old, 6-feet tall, and more than capable of taking care of himself. In the summer of 2004, Bill found himself on the losing end of a love triangle that upset him very much. He took his loss hard, and being a man unafraid to stand up for himself, he decided to confront the man who had taken away his girl: a successful businessman and local politician with his own trucking company.

On August 24th, 2004, Bill Smolinski called his rival and left a message on the man's voice mail telling him of his intention to confront him. No one has ever seen or heard from Billy again. At first, the police figured he simply couldn't accept his loss and may well have committed suicide. But Bill had already made plans for the following weekend to go up to Six Flags with another ex-girlfriend. And Bill's pet German Shepard was left inside his house, unattended to. Other clues to this case would also indicate foul play: Bill's pickup truck had been left parked at the end of his driveway. Later on, an officer would find Bill's truck keys and wallet stuffed underneath the front seat of the truck. And when Bill's family began to post missing person posters around the outlying towns, Bill's ex-girlfriend, Madeleine Gleason - the one who had left him for the other man - followed up behind them to deface the posters or tear them down. Strange behavior for anyone, let alone someone who supposedly had cared for Billy.


The police questioned both Billy's rival and Gleason. Neither was subjected to a lie detector test. Surprisingly, the authorities subsequently struck both persons off of their suspect list. When asked why the only two people with a grudge against Billy were taken out as suspects, an officer was reported to have told family members "he [the rival] seems like a real nice guy."

One would suppose then that Gleason was let off because she seemed like a real cute girl.

The police did take DNA samples from Billy's home. Unfortunately, they failed to submit them to the national database for comparison. They also failed to fingerprint his truck. And after their suicide theory didn't gel-up, the police then came up with an amazing theory in which Billy had perhaps taken off to Europe (or somewhere) to live it up for a while, and he would probably come back sometime soon. But then there is still the dog left in the home. Not to mention his wallet. And his truck parked at the end of his driveway with the keys stashed away....

Here is what a reasonable person, looking at this case with only outside knowledge, would assume had happened: Billy drove out to confront his rival. His rival was ready. Billy's car was then driven back to his house (by someone else), hurriedly parked at the end of his driveway, whereupon the driver quickly fled in a waiting second car. Billy's wallet was left hidden in the car so that his body would not have any ID on it.

Now, other things could well have happened. Billy had told a neighbor that he intended to be gone for a few days to go look at a car up north. Something might have happened up there. But that still would not explain his keys and wallet being stashed away, not to mention his dog being left in the house. (The neighbor was supposed to look after the dog, but the house was locked up, so he had no way inside.)

Regardless of the circumstances, the police themselves were a little slow to draw any conclusions. In fact, it reportedly wasn't until 18 months after Billy Smolinski's disappearance that the Waterbury police chief finally admitted publicly for the first time that Billy might well have been the victim of foul play.

Do tell.

In the meantime, area police did manage to make one arrest in relation to the case: Billy Smolinski's mom was arrested for harrassment after she posted missing persons posters close to where Gleason worked as a school bus driver. Later on, Gleason would file a harrassment lawsuit against Billy's mom, and as a result of a story being written about these events*, writer John Murray of the Waterbury Observer was also being sued for invasion of privacy.

The entire investigation, it seems, has gone into disarray. And that is very bad news for Billy Smolinski and his family.




* Read the Observer story here, and Click here for a detailed history of the case, by John Murray.



MORE CASES:

The Billy Smolinski case is not unique.

Maura Murray disappeared in Haverhill, NH, on February 9th, 2004. Despite the circumstance of her disappearance - she had been in a one-car accident, but upon the arrival of police at the scene, she had gone missing - the local authorities did not begin their investigation until two days after the event. Even after that, they reportedly said they had no evidence to suspect foul play, and apparently no forensics study was ever done at the scene. State Police dogs traced Maura's tracks for 100 yards past her abandoned car. After that, there was no trace of her at all. And the police did not suspect foul play? Not even as a possibility? Local and State police also pulled the suicide card as a possible factor, which of course would still not explain Maura's disappearance without a trace. But it did help alienate the Murray family, who reacted with predictable rage.

In the case of missing teenager Brianna Maitland, the Vermont State Police first suspected her as a runaway, then later changed their minds and said that her own "bad lifestyle choices" may have lead to her disappearance. According to the authorities, Brianna was apparently associating with illegal drug users. But her family said she worked two jobs, was living with a friend, and was generally pulling her life together. And once again, the circumstances of the case would appear to point in another direction: Brianna was on her way home from her job at a restaurant, the Black Lantern Inn, in Montgomery, VT, late at night, and her car was found about a mile away from the same restaurant, abandoned against the side of a barn. One would tend to think that perhaps a restaurant patron followed her. But that would be an uneducated guess. (Note: Brianna's paychecks were found in the car, and her ATM card, medication, makeup, and contact lenses were still at her friend's home.) In any event, the matter was further muddled by the fact that Brianna's car was found even before a missing persons report was filed, but police apparently never notified the parents of the discovery, despite the car being in their name. It is these types of errors of omission that can often make a difficult case that much harder. In the end, the investigation into Brianna's disappearance did not commence until nearly a week had passed by.

Tina Sinclair and her 15-year-old daughter, Bethany, of Chesterfield, NH, went missing from the home they shared with Tina's boyfriend on February 4th, 2001. Tina was supposed to cut her stepfather's hair the next day (a Sunday). She never showed. Instead, the boyfriend reportedly had a little bonfire that day. Bethany was supposed to be in school that Monday. She never made it in. The local police called the boyfriend at midweek to inquire about the two women. The boyfriend told the police that he had a fight with Tina late Saturday night/Sunday morning, and darned if he knew where the both of them went to after that. Note: Tina's car was still in his driveway. Her cat was still in the home. Tina also never showed up for her job that week. The police finally found their way to the boyfriend's house to question him in person on the Friday of the end of the week. The State Police finally got around to searching his property about a month later.

From all of these cases, one can surmise that it's the waiting that hurts the most - for both the families of the missing and the investigation itself. Even when a body may be discovered, what remains will more than likely be bones. And no answers.

There are approximately 2,300 missing persons reports filed every day in America. It is true that the vast majority of those are runaway children, and that many of the remaining adult missing persons reports may turn out to be false alarms. But there are also certain cases where the circumstances clearly show that something has gone a-miss: abandoned cars, clothing and pets left behind, bank accounts untouched. These cases surely must be seen in a different, more urgent light than the others. And just as families should understand that the police have many other cases besides that of their loved-ones, so too the police should know that for each family of a missing person or unsolved homicide, this is the single most tragic event going on in their lives. They need and expect the best that law enforcement has to offer.

Time is of the essence.


monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:40 PM (GMT)
http://cooljustice.blogspot.com/2006/07/do...angle-case.html

Does Missing Person / Love Triangle Case Add Up To Homicide?

News & Commentary

Does Missing Person /
Love Triangle Case
Add Up To Homicide?

By ANDY THIBAULT
The Cool Justice Report
www.cooljustice.blogspot.com
July 26, 2006

EDITOR'S NOTE: This column is available for reprint courtesy of The Cool Justice Report, http://cooljustice.blogspot.com

Big, tough guy in Waterbury leaves his dog and his truck behind. Was sharing the sack with someone you normally wouldn't bring home to Mom. His older Love Bunny was sharing her feelings with a married pol whose business covers the Eastern Seaboard.

The big guy didn't like it when he found out about the other man. He threatened the pol. And was never seen again. Police have a tape of the threatening call.

Still, this scenario did not raise much suspicion with certain elements of the Waterbury police department, namely the detective bureau.

Billy Smolinski, six-feet, 200 pounds, was not someone to go quietly. He worked several jobs including a stint as a tow truck driver. When he disappeared on Aug. 24, 2004, he was 31 years old. His girlfriend was 47 then.

Police told the Smolinski family Billy was probably in Europe or on the lam somewhere having a good time. Despite pleas from the family, police never took fingerprints from Billy's truck. They misplaced DNA samples and couldn't figure out how to place them on various local, state and national databases.

Credit John Murray, a Lone Ranger in the journalism world, with breaking ground in this story. Murray, a respected and talented photographer and writer, has published the monthly Waterbury Observer for 13 years. He has written in detail about investigations of the local police department that went nowhere, including missing drugs and cash in the six-figure range.

Murray maintains pipelines with all levels of the department. The tone changed in March of this year when he reached Chief Neil O'Leary: "I would never rule out foul play. I don't think he [Billy Smolinksi] disappeared on his own and is hiding from his family. My gut feeling is something is wrong."

Ultimately, police spoke with Murray about details of the case on the record. They confirmed the identities of Players Two and Three in the love triangle.

The love interest, Woodbridge bus driver Madeleine Gleason went public herself in a curious legal action. After tearing down handbills about a $15,000 reward for finding Billy, Gleason sued Billy's mother Jan Smolinski and Murray for invasion of privacy. Murray had published photos of Gleason in public.

"She has no expectation of privacy whatsoever on the street," said noted media attorney Alan Neigher of Wesport, a long-time counsel for Connecticut Magazine. "Whatever she does on a public street is public business. She loses."

The case has had no shortage of bizarre twists. Woodbridge police arrested Jan Smolinski last year, charging her with disorderly conduct after she posted reward flyers and confronted Gleason. The case was dismissed.

Notably, the Woodbridge police identified Gleason as a suspect in the case. Waterbury detectives told Murray that neither Gleason nor her politician boyfriend were suspects. Yet, a Woodbridge police report states: "That Waterbury police did look into Gleason as a suspect. That Gleason was advised by them that she could remove herself from being a suspect by taking a polygraph exam…"

I called O'Leary, Gleason's lawyer and the politician. There are many questions they could answer. They did not call back.

"There is a lack of will to pursue this case," Murray told me. "They're not handling it seriously. They're either covering up bungling - or something worse."

If the Waterbury police are not going to pursue the Smolinski case, then some other law enforcement agency should. The Smolinski family and the community deserve answers.

Andy Thibault, author of Law & Justice In Everyday Life and a private investigator, is a mentor in the MFA writing program at Western Connecticut State University, consulting editor for the literary journal Connecticut Review and adjunct professor at the University of Hartford's Hillyer College. Website,www.andythibault.com, and Blog, http://cooljustice.blogspot.com

Posted by andythibault on Wednesday, July 26, 2006 at 11:58 AM | Permalink

monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:41 PM (GMT)
http://waterburyobserver.com/worxcms_publi...epage_163.shtml

Story By John Murray


There is no force on earth more powerful than a mother's love for her child. It's deeper than primal, it might be life's force itself.


Woe is the hiker who comes between a mama bear and her cubs, and woe is the bureaucracy that tries to stop Janice Smolinski from finding out what happened to her missing son, Billy.


In the past two years, frustrated with an apathetic response from authorities, Janice and her family launched their own investigation into her son's mysterious disappearance. They have hired private investigators, launched their own search party, become experts on DNA, and relentlessly tack Billy Smolinski posters on telephone poles across western Connecticut.


In the process Janice has butted heads with Waterbury police officers, been arrested in Woodbridge, CT, and is now being sued by her son's ex-girlfriend.


"I'm not going to stop until I find out what happened to Billy," Janice Smolinski said. "There is no other way. My next step could be jail. I hope that doesn't happen, but I'm ready."


Janice, and her husband, Bill, are convinced their son is dead. At the time of his disappearance Billy was involved in a love triangle. The last telephone call he made was to his male rival in the triangle. It was a threatening call, and Billy's family believe he would have sought a physical confrontation with the man.


That call was made August 24, 2004, the day Billy disappeared.


The man who Billy Smolinski threatened is a prominent politician in Woodbridge, CT. His family owns and operates a long distance trucking business.


Billy's ex-girlfriend, Madeleine Gleason, is a school bus driver in Woodbridge. Weeks after Billy disappeared his missing person posters were being torn down in several towns. The family investigated and were stunned to learn that Madeleine Gleason, and her friend, Frances Vrabel, were the ones tearing Billy's posters down.


"Why would they do that?" Janice Smolinski said. "Why would anyone do that, especially his girlfriend."


Billy Smolinski's bizarre disappearance two years ago was mishandled immediately by the Waterbury Police Department as they bungled evidence from the inception. They never fingerprinted Billy's truck and they misplaced three DNA samples provided by the Smolinskis. Nearly two years after Billy's disappearance the Waterbury Police Department is still attempting to get DNA samples from the case into local, state and national DNA data bases.


As the Smolinski family pleaded for help in finding Billy, the police responded with indifference. Billy Smolinski was a 31 year old man who had told his neighbor he was headed north for a few days to look at a car. Billy was on a walk-a-bout, police told the family.


That didn't make sense to the Smolinskis.


Billy would never of headed north without properly tending to his dog, Harley, and telling his close-knit family where he was headed. Something was terribly wrong, and Billy's family recognized the situation immediately. Billy was in trouble.
With a slow response from Waterbury police, the Smolinskis launched their own search; scouring gravel pits and river banks. Two hundred volunteers spent Labor Day weekend of 2004 looking for a trace of Billy. They found nothing.


Then two weeks later, Sgt. Steve Pedbereznek of the Waterbury Police Department found Billy's wallet and keys tucked underneath the seat of his truck. Why would Billy head north to check out a car without his wallet and keys, and leave his pick-up truck parked in a strange place in his driveway?


The Smolinskis began to fear the worst. Billy was never coming home again.


Gradually, during the next few months, explosive facts began to emerge in the case. In the week before he went missing Billy had begun to suspect that his girlfriend, Madeleine Gleason, was having an affair. They had argued during a trip to Florida and broke-up days before Billy disappeared.


A search of Billy's telephone records led police to a politician in Woodbridge, CT. The Waterbury police brought the man in for questioning and he produced a threatening message left on his answering machine by Billy Smolinski. The message was left the day Billy disappeared.


The man admitted to the Waterbury police that he did have an affair with Madeleine Gleason and was worried that his wife was now going to find out. Despite the love triangle, and the threatening message, the Waterbury police did not administer a lie detector test and have eliminated the man as a suspect in Billy's disappearance.
The Smolinski family was stunned.


"How can they eliminate this man as a suspect?" Janice Smolinski said. "When we asked a detective why, he told us (the man) seemed like a real nice guy."


Madeleine Gleason was also brought into police headquarters to answer questions, and she has been eliminated as a suspect in Billy's disappearance, also.


For 18 months after Billy's disappearance the Waterbury Police Department said they suspected no foul play in the case. When the Observer began investigating the situation back in February, the first officer interviewed, Deputy Chief Jimmy Egan, said that Billy Smolinski was probably in Europe having fun and would eventually show up.


Egan attempted to discredit Janice Smolinski by telling a story about the family's use of a psychic to try and solve the case. The image he painted of Billy Smolinski was not flattering.


Egan confirmed there had been a love triangle. He said no lie detector had been given because the results wouldn't be admissible in court. Egan clearly stated that the Woodbridge politician was not a suspect and asked the Observer if the paper planned to print the politician's name.


When the answer was yes, Egan grew agitated ,and said "You'll ruin the guy's life."
During the Observer's first meeting with Deputy Chief Jimmy Egan he appeared intent on discrediting the Smolinskis and the very notion that anything was suspicious about Billy's disappearance.


Three days later Egan's approach changed dramatically. Waterbury Police Chief Neil O'Leary had publicly stated something was wrong in the case (the first Waterbury police officer to say that to the media) and had set up a meeting between the Observer and the lead detectives on the case. During this meeting Egan said he had nothing but respect for the Smolinski family and said several times that he had never said a bad word about the family.


That was untrue. Egan had spent most of his initial interview with the Observer attempting to discredit the Smolinskis. He had gone so far as to say Janice Smolinski wasn't all there in the head, and in her grief, was grasping at straws.


After the Observer printed a five page story about the disappearance of Billy Smolinski in its March 2006 edition, the family met with Waterbury Police Chief Neil O'Leary. The Smolinskis said that Chief O'Leary apologized to them for the way they had been treated by the Waterbury Police Department and promised a reinvigorated investigation.


There was talk about using cadaver dogs to search for Billy, and the Smolinskis requested that a cemetery in Seymour be included in the dog search. One of Madeleine Gleason's sons, Shaun, had previously worked as a grave-digger at the Seymour Cemetery. Chief O'Leary told the Observer that bringing search dogs into a cemetery would be highly sensitive and he was unsure how to begin the process. The Smolinskis have asked the police to look into the graves that were dug around the time of Billy's disappearance, but as yet, nothing has materialized.


Twenty month after Billy disappeared the police conducted a search with cadaver dogs around his house and into the woods around an industrial park near his home. They found nothing.


The 10,000 pound gorilla in the room, however, is Woodbridge.


Woodbridge is where Madeleine Gleason works and lives. Woodbridge is where the influential politician lives. Woodbridge is where Janice Smolinski was arrested for hanging flyers. Woodbridge, the Smolinskis believe, is the key to unravelling what happened to Billy in August 2004. The Smolinskis have requested that the cadaver dogs be brought onto the property of the politician and used to investigate the woods around his family's trucking business.


But since he has been eliminated as a suspect by the Waterbury Police Department, there is virtually no chance of that happening, unless something changes.


This approach, at best, is backwards. The investigation so far has shone an uncomplimentary light upon a Waterbury Police Department that seems completely uninterested in seriously probing into the life of the Woodbridge politician, which begs the question - why?


Why are detectives inside the Waterbury police department hesitant to peek into a potential Pandora's Box? Is there a connection between someone in the Waterbury police department and this influential politician?


There is no excuse for this investigation to languish on someone's desk down at police headquarters. There are leads, impossibly strong leads, and they are not being pursued with vigor. This is police work 101.


It is time for the Waterbury Police Department to step to the table and conduct a thorough investigation into the disappearance of Billy Smolinski. And if they don't, it's time to bring in state or federal investigators. If our local police don't have the will to investigate then the Smolinskis, and the citizens of Waterbury, deserve to have the state police step in and take over the case.


"There is no body and no hard evidence," Janice Smolinski said. "But we believe a crime was committed against Billy. There are clues about what might have happened and who might be involved, but from the beginning the Waterbury Police Department has not aggressively investigated Billy's case."


GETTING SUED
Now Janice Smolinski and her daughter. Paula Bell, are being sued by Madeleine Gleason for harassment. In the suit filed by New Haven lawyer, John Williams, Gleason alleges that the Smolinskis have knowingly, intentionally and maliciously followed her on a daily basis, posted flyers in the immediate vicinity of her workplace and her home, photographed and videotaped her, and threatened her with physical injury.


"It's nothing but lies," Janice Smolinski said. "They are trying to get me to go away, to intimidate me. It is not going to work. We aren't giving up until we know what happened to Billy."


The Waterbury Observer, and this reporter, are also being sued by Madeleine Gleason in the same lawsuit that was filed against Janice Smolinski. Gleason is suing the Observer for invasion of privacy. She states, among other things, that she is a private citizen that didn't give permission for her images to appear in the March issue of the Observer.


She is a private citizen, but Gleason lost that veil of cover when she stepped out in public to tear down hundreds of Billy Smolinski posters in broad daylight. It is our belief she stepped way over the line by tearing Billy's posters down while she was driving a school bus in Woodbridge. The Smolinskis have videotape of Madeleine Gleason stalking them through Woodbridge while she was driving a school bus.


In the March issue of the Observer, and in this article, the paper printed the facts that we could substantiate through direct police confirmation, or what was directly witnessed by this reporter. This newspaper felt it was our moral responsibility to place the bizarre circumstances surrounding the disappearance of Billy Smolinski out in the open for everybody to see.


We plan to continue.


JANICE SMOLINSKI
As she seeks answers to her son's disappearance, Janice Smolinski has become the center of the storm. She has been bad-mouthed by the Deputy Chief of Police in Waterbury, arrested in Woodbridge, and is now being sued. Who is this tiny woman with a backbone of steel? The Observer sat down with her recently to discuss her life and what her world was like before Billy disappeared.


She was born Janice Kenney at St. Mary's Hospital in downtown Waterbury in 1952. The family spent the first five years of Janice's life living in the Brass City. In 1957 the Kenney's moved to Oakville, and two years later Janice's mom unexpectedly died, effectively ending Janice's childhood.


"I learned early on that people you love can be taken away from you," Janice said. "That's not something you ever get over."


When she 16 years old Janice and some friends were at Black Rock State Park in Thomaston when she was approached by young William Smolinski. They dated for two years, and against her father's wishes, Janice and Bill were married in 1970.


They moved onto a 10 acre farm in Naugatuck owned by Bill's family. Is was a Smolinski family compound. Bill's parents lived in a house on the property with two other sons. Bill's aunt and uncle lived in a third house on the property. The couple lived on the farm for the next 27 years in what Janice describes as "a great sort of old fashioned life."


The couple had two children, Billy and Paula, and the kids helped tend to the cows, pigs and chickens. Billy and Paula collected fresh eggs every day, rode ponies and horses, and learned early on about responsibility and hard work. The family was self-sufficient, butchering their own beef and poultry, and canning and freezing produce from a vast garden.


Hay was grown in the fields and Janice said "everyone participated in the cutting, bailing, and loading of it into the barn." The children were always outside feeding the animals, fishing, riding their bikes or cruising around the property on their quads.


"It was a great place to raise our children," Janice said. "There was hardly any time for television, and the kids didn't show any interest in it anyway."


Janice said Billy was wildly entertaining on the farm. "If he wasn't in a tree he'd be jumping out of a hay loft," she said. "He wanted to be a stunt man and was always jumping off of something. We made many visits to the emergency room."


It was indeed a great sort of old fashioned life. Bill went off to work at Pratt & Whitney and Janice stayed home on the farm to cook, bake, clean and raise her two children. She also helped feed the animals and clean the stalls. When asked by a reporter at the Republican-American newspaper to describe her background, Janice Smolinski replied that "she was a homemaker, nothing special, just happy to be at home."


She said "when the kids were small she felt it was important that they had a mom available at ALL times. I was always on the other side of the door when they came home from school, activities, or I was able to drive them wherever they needed to be."


Seven years ago, Bill's dad, who owned the property, decided to sell the farm. "He was getting older and not feeling well," Janice said of her father-in-law. "It was time for us all to move on."


Billy Smolinski was still living with his parents on the farm and hated the idea of the property being sold. "Billy loved the farm," Janice said. He was 26 years old and he didn't like change."


But change came. Janice and Bill bought a nice home in Cheshire and Billy was now on his own. Instead of renting, he bought his own home in the south end of Waterbury on Holly Street.


The move off the farm signaled a major shift in the Smolinski family.


"Farm life is a lot of work," Janice said. "Bill and I wanted a home that was easier to maintain and we eventually planned on moving to Florida. We were downsizing our responsibilities."


But when Billy disappeared in August 2004 the Smolinski's world shattered. A family that had been self-sufficient for more than 30 years was now in desperate need of help - help that has yet to come.


When the Smolinskis realized the police weren't the answer, they've taken matters in their own hands. Janice spends hours every day talking to private investigators, coroners, DNA experts, and journalists from all across the country on the telephone and the internet. They have created a website called justice4billy.com


Janice's best friend for the past 40 years is Robin Lichaj of Prospect. The two became fast friends as freshman at Watertown High School. The two speak on the telephone every day and Robin has witnessed a remarkable transformation in Janice since Billy vanished.


"Janice was always soft spoken and shy," Lichaj said. "She is very religious and was completely devoted to her family. To see what she is doing now is remarkable. She's gone from being a French Poodle to a very aggressive and determined Chihuahua. Janice is little, but mighty."


Lichaj said the secret to Janice Smolinski's strength is a mother's love, and a deep faith in God. "Janice will never back down," Lichaj said. "She wants to know what happened to her son and she is acting as any mother would. When it comes to your offspring the talons come out to protect. She is going on a mother's love."



monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:43 PM (GMT)

monkalup - November 15, 2006 05:44 PM (GMT)

monkalup - March 31, 2007 07:19 AM (GMT)
HARTFORD, Conn. --When Janice Smolinski's 31-year-old son
Billy disappeared in 2004, there were no Amber Alerts, no
urgent police investigations.
Police made the family wait three days to report the
Waterbury man's disappearance because a neighbor believed he
had left town voluntarily. They had to organize their own
search parties and pressure police to fingerprint Billy's
truck, his mother said.
When authorities did take the case, they lost or misplaced
the family's DNA samples -- including Billy's razor shavings
-- three times, Smolinski said.
Two-and-a-half years later, Billy Smolinski is nowhere to be
found and his mother has joined a national grass-roots
effort to lobby for more consistent laws for handling
missing adult cases.
The group's Campaign for the Missing is lobbying this year
in Connecticut, New Jersey, Florida, Oregon, New York,
Missouri, Ohio and Indiana.
"Our system isn't working," said Janice Smolinski.
"Unfortunately, when adults go missing, they don't really
take it seriously."
Of more than 109,000 active records in the National Crime
Information Center's Missing Person File as of Dec. 31,
2005, just under half involve adults.
But the National Center for Missing Adults, which handled
more than 23,000 reports and helped nearly 25,000 family
members in 2005, announced last year that federal budget
cuts had forced it to close its Phoenix offices and attempt
to relocate to a less expensive space.
Funding was cut to $148,000 last year for the center, which
also helped families during Hurricane Katrina.
The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, in
comparison, typically receives more than $35 million a year
from the federal government.
Police say they don't have the resources to focus attention
on every case, and adults are allowed to disappear
voluntarily.
"It's a free country and we've got to remember that," said
West Hartford Police Chief James Strillacci, legislative
chairman for the Connecticut Police Chiefs Association. "We
have wanderlust in our blood and people get up and move once
in a while."
Contrary to television crime shows, he said, the FBI rarely
assists in missing adult cases.
"We cannot do for everybody that they would like us to do,"
he said. "We can only do what the law and our budgets
allow."
The bills proposed by Campaign for the Missing touch on
everything from banning cremation of unidentified remains to
informing families about the clearinghouses for missing
adults and children.
Each would prevent police from refusing to accept missing
persons reports in most circumstances. They spell out data
police must collect for a missing person, from eye color to
blood type. They would also allow police to flag a missing
person -- such as someone with medical problems -- as high
risk, triggering more immediate action.
The families of missing adults also want police to enter all
collected information, including DNA profiles, into
applicable federal databases and provide timely case updates
to family members.
They also want more publicity for missing adults.
The Amber Alert program, named for a 9-year-old girl who was
kidnapped and killed, allows law enforcement and television
and radio broadcasters to activate an urgent bulletin in the
most serious child abduction cases.
But for adults, attention focuses largely on the bizarre or
unusual, such as runaway bride Jennifer Wilbanks, who fled
days before her planned 2005 wedding and made up a story
about being kidnapped and sexually assaulted to cover the
fact that she got cold feet and went to New Mexico.
When Drew Kesse's 24-year-old daughter, Jennifer, didn't
show up for work in Orlando, Fla., on Jan. 24, 2006, a
police officer suggested the attractive blonde financial
analysts had gotten into a fight with her boyfriend and
would return soon. More than a year has passed with no sign
of her.
"There is absolutely no evidence. She has truly vanished,"
he said. "It's heartbreaking."
To drum up attention, the families of the missing have
become amateur public relations consultants, creating web
sites and organizing public events.
Kesse has flown banners over football games and printed
playing cards with Jennifer's picture. Well-wishers have
paid for eight billboards and posters in 24 bus shelters.
Kelly Jolkowski, whose Nebraska-based Project Jason created
the Campaign for the Missing, has organized charity bike
rides and appearances on the Montel Williams Show to
generate interest in missing people, including her
19-year-old son Jason, who vanished from the family's Omaha
driveway in 2001.
"The only thing you can do is get the story out there," she
said. "One of these days you're going to hit the right
person."
Though Omaha police did a complete investigation of her
son's disappearance, Jolkowski said that's not the norm.
"When you have somebody disappear as an adult rather than a
minor, it's an entirely different situation," she said.
"There's no federal law that mandates them. Unless the state
has passed this legislation, they are not mandated to do
anything. They don't even have to take the case, period."
Jolkowski said families have told her of local police not
aware of the federal DNA database. She has learned of
unidentified bodies cremated or buried in unmarked graves
without any DNA samples taken.
"It was a chore to get the police to take Molly's case
seriously because she was 23," said Keri Dattilo, referring
to her cousin Molly Dattilo, who disappeared July 6, 2004 in
Indianapolis.
Keri Dattilo said it took six weeks before an investigation
began in earnest.
"They could have tracked down more people in the very
beginning with a fresh memory," she said. "I think they need
to start taking these cases seriously in the beginning. They
need to listen to the families."
New Jersey resident Jim Viola's wife, Patricia, disappeared
six years ago, the day before Valentine's Day. He has since
learned by trial and error what should be done when someone
disappears. He didn't know for more than three years that a
DNA profile of his wife could be created with a blood sample
from his mother-in-law.
By pushing Campaign for the Missing legislation in his
state, he hopes to save others from some of the heartache
he's suffered.
"I'm basically trying to get New Jersey residents to write
to their senator, to get them to understand that this law is
for them," he said.



Ell - April 21, 2007 10:35 PM (GMT)
THE WOODBRIDGE CONNECTION:The trail of a missing Waterbury man
By: Marilyn Moss, Special to the Bulletin
The mystery surrounding the disappearance of Billy Smolinski, a Waterbury man missing since August 2004, has
received intense scrutiny recently. Presently, the state legislature, prompted by the story of Smolinski's disappearance, is
considering a bill to improve methods for handling missing adult cases. In addition, on April 11, the Waterbury Police
Department, under orders of the Connecticut Freedom of Information Commission, released its records concerning the
investigation of Smolinski's disappearance to the public.
In those records, Madeline Gleason and Christian Sorensen, both Woodbridge residents, are mentioned in connection with the
investigation.
According to the police records, as of August 2004, Smolinski had been involved in a yearlong relationship with Gleason, a
Woodbridge school bus driver for B&B Transportation. During that same period of time, Gleason had also been involved with
Sorensen, another Woodbridge school bus driver and a former member of the Board of Selectmen. According to the police
reports, Gleason said that Smolinski broke off the relationship during the week preceding his disappearance when he learned
about Gleason's relationship with Sorensen.
Gleason last saw Smolinski on Aug. 24 2004, the day he disappeared. On that same day, Sorensen's phone records revealed
three calls from Smolinski. According to the police reports, Smolinski left a threatening message on the answering machine,
saying, "Chris you better watch your back."
Sorensen, who was interviewed by the Waterbury police, admitted having a relationship with Gleason. Sorensen maintained,
however, that he had no personal interaction with Smolinski. Initially, Sorensen denied any trouble with Smolinski, but he
subsequently told police that Smolinski was responsible for breaking windows on Sorensen's bus several months earlier.
Almost immediately following Smolinski's disappearance, the Smolinski family began hanging missing person posters of Billy
Smolinski in Woodbridge, as well as other surrounding towns. Those posters were torn down repeatedly. Although Gleason
denied tearing down posters in a Waterbury police report dated Aug. 5, 2005, Gleason admitted to tearing down the posters in a
Woodbridge police report dated Nov. 22 2004. That report states that Gleason said, "... she will continue to tear them down if
she sees them posted."
After months of this poster battle, the Woodbridge police arrested Janice Smolinski, the mother of the missing man, for criminal
trespass. According to the Woodbridge Police Department spokesman, Sgt. Frank Cappiello, the warrant was an attempt to quiet
things down. "We were trying to defuse the situation," he said.
Those charges were subsequently dismissed at trial. However, Janice Smolinski and her daughter, Paula Bell, are facing
litigation filed by Gleason and her employer, B&B Transportation. The suit claims that the Smolinskis harassed the plaintiffs.
The suit was filed in August 2006, but the Smolinskis have continued to hang missing person posters. And those posters
continue to be torn down.
During the investigation by the Waterbury police, Gleason also told the police that one of Sorensen's friends, whom she refused
to identify, had received a call on or about Aug. 29, 2004, from a Hartford payphone. According to Gleason's report, the caller
said, "Tell Chris to watch his back."
In that same report, Gleason said that she had received a number of hang-up calls from Rhode Island, but she had not saved the
phone numbers on her caller ID. Gleason did tell the police that Smolinski "was an outdoorsman and loved to hike in the woods,
and he knew how to survive in the woods."
The released police records all revealed that an Oxford man contacted "Crime Stoppers" in June 2006 in response to a segment
aired about Billy Smolinski. The Waterbury police subsequently interviewed the individual, who preferred to remain unnamed.
According to the police report, this individual said that in October 2004 he was told by a close friend of Shaun Karpiuk,
Gleason's son who died in February 2005, that Karpiuk choked Smolinski to death at Gleason's apartment. The body was buried
at a construction site in Shelton; the grave site was covered with concrete the following day. "I basically believe that that's what
happened. That's why I went to the police," the man said, who had once been an employer of Karpiuk.
Although the Waterbury police drove by the area, no further action was taken, according to the police records.
The investigation was taken over by the FBI in August 2006. The FBI had no comment about the ongoing investigation when
contacted on April 13. When asked about the above information concerning Karpiuk, however, a spokeswoman for the FBI,
MaryBeth Miklof, said, "We're still receiving information from the Waterbury Police Department."
Despite efforts to contact Gleason and Sorensen, neither of those individuals chose to respond.
http://www.justice4billy.com/The_Woodbridg...ion__m_moss.pdf

Ell - May 9, 2007 12:38 AM (GMT)
Search In Shelton For Missing Man Turns Up Nothing

POSTED: 10:13 am EDT May 8, 2007
UPDATED: 10:28 am EDT May 8, 2007

Email This Story | Print This Story
Sign Up for Breaking News Alerts


SHELTON, Conn. -- Federal agents and police have searched two neighborhoods and a driveway in Shelton on a tip that the body of a missing Waterbury man was buried there.

But the search Monday in some yards and at a home on Fort Hill Avenue failed to turn up any signs of William Smolinski.

State police dogs trained to locate human remains gave investigators some hope after the dogs indicated they picked up a scent near the driveway. However, after investigators dug a small hole and drilled under the driveway, the dogs did not indicate they smelled anything.


Waterbury police spokesman Lt. Christopher Corbett said the investigation into Smolinski's disappearance is ongoing.

Smolinski disappeared in August 2004.
http://www.nbc30.com/news/13276198/detail.html

monkalup - June 5, 2007 10:13 PM (GMT)

News Channel 8 www.WTNH.com



Legislature approves bill to improve missing persons investigations


Posted June 4, 2007
10:20 PM

(Hartford-AP) _ State lawmakers have approved a plan they say will improve how police investigate missing person cases and how information is released to victims' families.

The Senate voted 36-0 in favor of the bill and sent it to Governor Rell. The House approved it unanimously last month.

The legislation would require the state's Police Officer Standards and Training Council to develop new policies for municipal departments by next January. The policies would include guidelines for accepting reports, the kind of information police must collect and what details police should provide to relatives of people who have vanished.

The bill was spurred by Waterbury resident Janice Smolinski, whose 31-year-old son Billy disappeared in 2004 and remains missing. Janice Smolinski says police made her family wait three days to report his disappearance, and authorities later lost or misplaced DNA samples three times. She also says the family had to organize its own search parties and pressure police to fingerprint Billy Smolinski's truck.



monkalup - June 8, 2007 03:04 PM (GMT)
http://www.rep-am.com/

Missing Billy

Sunday, August 21, 2005

By Brynn Mandel

Copyright © 2005 Republican-American

In the hours after he placed a 2:59 p.m. order for a Whopper, cheeseburger, medium fries and Coke last Aug. 24, Billy Smolinski vanished. To the family that has searched for him every day since, the reasons for Billy's disappearance remain as elusive as the now-faded print on the fast-food receipt, plucked from his trash.

At his Holly Street home in Waterbury, where Billy, 31, tinkered with cars in the cinder-block garage, he left behind his keys, wallet and white pickup truck.

He left untouched his bank account.

He left unattended Harley, his beloved German Shepard, regularly seen trailing his handsome 6-foot, 200-pound master.

And in the wake of his disappearance 362 days ago today, Billy left his close-knit family in an emotional limbo so consuming that they struggle to move forward with their lives. Daily, their emotions ping-pong between hope and despair: Searching for Billy, missing him, wondering if he is dead.

About a half-hour after the Burger King order, Billy knocked on a neighbor's door.

He was going up north for three days. Maybe to see about a car. Could the neighbor look after his dog? Billy said he'd leave a key to his Cape Cod-style home, which he had been prepping for a coat of paint.

The next morning, the neighbor could not find the key.

Billy's family dutifully waited three days before going to police. It was uncharacteristic of Billy to be out-of-touch for more than a day or two. He usually consulted them on the rare occasions he planned to travel.

In the week before his disappearance, Billy had flown for the first time in about a decade.

He had discussed the forthcoming trip to Florida with friends and family. He agonized, because of a longtime fear of flying.

But he mapped attractions like the Jupiter Lighthouse, suppressed his fear and traveled to West Palm Beach with the woman he had been seeing for about a year.

By the end of that week, she would become his ex-girlfriend.

Despite the break-up, Billy did not seem distraught to friends and family. In fact, he asked another woman to go to Six Flags amusement park with him that coming Saturday.

The date was not kept. That was unusual for Billy, who reliably showed up at his two jobs, as a tow-truck driver and as an apprentice heating and air conditioning technician. Just before he disappeared Billy drew a slow-season layoff from the HVAC company. At Waterbury's Durable Towing, Billy's boss immediately offered him extra hours.

The odds: one in hundreds

In Waterbury, a city of 108,000, dozens of adults are reported missing every year.

During the two most recent years for which Waterbury police had records available, 2002 and 2003, there were more unsolved (142) than solved (122) missing-adult cases.

Police attribute this to families that fail to notify them after the loved one shows up, or, the families themselves move on.

In most cases, the FBI does not get involved. Exceptions are violations of federal law or when local police request help. Nationally, more than 48,100 active adult missing-person cases are listed in the National Crime Information Center database.

Of those, most are men.

But the ones Americans know are Chandra Levy. Laci Peterson. Natalee Holloway: pretty, young women who disappeared.

Billy's mother, Janice, an attractive housewife who looks younger than her 53 years, at once appreciates and resents the attention given those girls.

If only she had an e-mail address for Holloway's mom.

"I'd write her very nicely and say, 'You've got national attention. You've got world attention. I can't even get local attention.'"

The night Katie Couric interviewed runaway bride Jennifer Wilbanks, whose case of cold feet prompted a national manhunt, the Smolinskis' television remained off.

"She makes me sick, that woman," said Billy's younger sister, Paula Bell, shaking her head.

Police often find those reported missing just show up later than expected. They also discover the "missing" person living happily someplace else.

There is, they note, no law against grown men up and leaving.

But Billy's friends and family reject that possibility because he truly enjoyed his friends and was deeply invested in his family. He kept mementos. A shell from a walk on the beach; a dated cork from a bottle of wine. When a friend died in a motorcycle accident, Billy tattooed the man's name and a cross on his forearm.

An avid snowmobiler and fisherman, Billy seldom bothered with television. He had talked about becoming a cop.

He liked dogs, and anything with a motor. He studied auto mechanics at Naugatuck Valley Community College, but left after a year. On weekends, he drove in demolition derbies. Janice would watch through her fingers as Billy tore around the Hartford Civic Center or New Haven Colosseum.
He was adamant about family rituals. On Christmas mornings, breakfast came before presents. Memorial Days, Billy insisted the family watch Naugatuck's annual parade from a specific spot opposite the Fitzgerald-Zembruski Funeral Home.

They sat there this year. Janice perhaps hoping Billy would show up, smiling broadly beneath his faint brown mustache.

He was dependable to a fault. If you were late or blew him off? Prepare for a berating, friends and family say.

That's why Mary Ellen Noble, a former girlfriend who remained close to Billy, became so alarmed when Billy's neighbor called about the dog, Harley.

"I knew, I just knew there had to be something wrong," said Noble. "Because he would never just take off."

The supernatural: hope is everywhere

The call from the psychic came at night.

The woman told Linda Smolinski that her nephew, missing then for nearly two weeks, was at a hotel by the river, in Room 202.

Exhausted after a day of searching the banks of the Naugatuck River, from Watertown to Beacon Falls, the family bolted from their homes to the former Howard Johnson, near the Waterbury/Naugatuck line.

With police accompanying them that Labor Day evening, they searched Room 202. No Billy.

The psychic was called back, and her advice was revised. Not the HoJo, the Sheraton.

"She said, 'I know it's closed, but you have to get in there,'" recalled Janice.

Around midnight, the family and police caravan headed north to the deserted, under-renovation hotel, then being converted into the Connecticut Grand Hotel.

But there was no Room 202. And, again, no Billy.

Months later, Billy's parents and sister chuckle while recounting that frenzied night.

They don't know whether they really believe in psychics.

But they do know that if a psychic were to call this minute with a tip on Billy's whereabouts, they would all barrel out the door as fast as the telephone could be cradled back on its receiver.

"You have hope for everything," said Billy's father, William Smolinski, an aircraft machinist for Pratt & Whitney.

On the good days, hope abounds. On others, despair prevails.

"I don't even think he's with us anymore," Janice said one night in the quiet of her dining room.

A week later, standing in his garage, she nodded toward her son's dust-coated belongings. She spoke about the house, now occupied by tenants, awaiting Billy's return. The Smolinskis paid off his mortgage in January, borrowing $75,000 against their own home in Cheshire.

"We all know his personality. If it wasn't foul play, then something is wrong with him," said Janice.

She seldom sleeps through the night. Her husband says he is no longer the same, outgoing, jovial person co-workers and friends once knew.

And Paula Bell's doll-like face cringes and reddens, tears welling when she remembers the near-daily phone calls and visits with her brother. They grew up riding dirt bikes, snowmobiles and horses on the family's 10-acre Naugatuck farm.

In April, the family attended a Brooks & Dunn concert, hoping to take their minds off their troubles. At the Oakdale Theater, none of them could applaud. It didn't feel right to cheer.

The search: every day a little agony

When a person vanishes, those left behind endure a distinct grief called ambiguous loss.

"There is no closure," says Pauline Boss, a University of Minnesota family psychology professor. Without a body, families maintain hope. They mourn a loss, but also agonize about not knowing what happened.

"They live with a paradox of absence and presence," says the author of "Ambiguous Loss: Learning to Live with Unresolved Grief."

Families vacillate between believing their relative will return home and accepting that they might be dead.

Almost daily, a Smolinski family member covers miles of roads, stapling posters to utility poles promising $15,000 for Billy's return or recovery.

One early June evening, Billy's mother, father, sister, aunt and uncle pile into the family's Buick.

Every few miles, a relative hops out. Five or six whacks of the staple gun, and they motor on, Billy's piercing blue eyes left to serve as haunting sentry over the roadway.

In Woodbridge and Seymour, where some posters have been slashed or torn down, the family strips shreds of old posters off poles and pins up new ones. Tearfully, they photograph posters scrawled with "Who Cares?" in black marker.

In Seymour, Billy's uncle, Bruce, parks in a cemetery. He jumps out, fliers in hand, and heads toward nearby utility poles. Janice stays behind. Around her, shadows from the setting sun lengthen.

"They found some bones," she exhales, the sound of passing cars echoing off the rows of nearby gravestones.

She heard it on the news the night before. Human remains near a trail in Hamden's Sleeping Giant State Park.

Every time a body surfaces, Janice's stomach drops. Is it Billy? She wants to know, yet she doesn't.

Last September, the entire family stood by as police investigated a decomposing body beneath a Waterbury train trestle. It wasn't Billy.

It was not their first whiff of death. Searching for Billy in the woods weeks earlier, an expert told Billy's dad: Sniff for rotting flesh. William smelled something, hope competing with nausea. A dead deer.

The Smolinskis' efforts do not stop at postering. They have spent thousands of dollars trying to find Billy. Private detectives. Lawyers. Advertising. Return address labels carry "MISSING" in bright red along with Billy's picture and Web site address.

Janice spends hours online every week, posting messages, corresponding with other mothers who share her plight.

Saturdays at 1 p.m., the Smolinskis release a balloon with a letter to Billy attached.

Billy, you are the love of our lives. It has been almost 10 months and still no word as to your whereabouts. Please my love, give us the sign we need to put you to rest. Our hearts are broken.

The pain, anguish and sleepless nights day after day are just taking their toll.

On June 11, they released balloons for the first time: a red, smiley-faced one for Billy and another for a 23-year-old Arkansas man who disappeared a week before Billy. That man's remains were found earlier this summer.

In a moment of agonizing coincidence, Billy's balloon landed in the hands of another family named Smolinski, though unrelated, in Hebron in Tolland County.

Maybe it is a sign, Janice says. Of what, she is not sure. They have not heard of another balloon recovered since.

The police: no signs of foul play

The National Center for Missing Adults wants law enforcement to adopt clear and consistent protocols in handling missing-adult cases.

"Literally town to town, it's handed differently," says Erin Bruno, the nonprofit's lead case manager.

The waiting period to file can range from hours to days. Some take a report upon first contact; others flatly refuse, deeming certain situations unworthy of opening a case.

It's different for children. Federal law requires police to immediately enter reports on juveniles into state and national databases because they are more likely to be at risk of harm or victimization.

In Waterbury, there is no set waiting period to report an adult missing. Rather, police response is based upon the circumstances, said Sgt. Christopher Corbett. Indications of foul play, medical problems or despondency usually elicit a swifter response than, for example, a person who habitually stays out for days. Connecticut state police take a similar approach.

Police believe that neither foul play nor medical issues are factors in Billy's disappearance. They noted his job loss and relationship difficulty. He had no criminal record or history of drug abuse. His Social Security number has not been used for a year.

"Obviously, it becomes more difficult as time goes on," said Corbett. "There's not a lot of information [in this case] to work with."

When the family began tacking posters up and down the Naugatuck Valley, Billy's ex-girlfriend admitted to tearing some down. She told Woodbridge police she felt harassed by their placement near her work and home. Police warned Janice: Stop putting posters near the school where the ex-girlfriend drives a bus.

Hurt and puzzled, the family continued putting up posters, including one Janice replaced on a utility pole near the driveway of the Woodbridge school.

In May, she was arrested for the first time in her 53 years. Woodbridge Police fingerprinted Janice. They snapped her mug shot. She left the police department that day facing charges of trespassing and disorderly conduct.

Waterbury police say the ex-girlfriend is not a suspect. Attempts to reach her in recent weeks by telephone, in person and through letters left at her home and work have gone unanswered.

On an early June morning, Janice's slight shoulders hunch forward on a bench in a busy New Haven Superior courtroom. Her periwinkle blouse, tucked neatly into cream-colored pants, matches her tired blue eyes.

For hours, the Bible-reading housewife watches accused criminals, some shackled hand and foot, parade before the judge. Morning turns to afternoon. Away from the bench, prosecutors chat with Janice. She explains that she is trying to find her son. The charges are dropped.

"It turned out to be a nice day," Janice says, descending the sun-washed courthouse steps.

Again, she can resume what has become the center of her existance: finding Billy.



monkalup - June 8, 2007 03:08 PM (GMT)
http://www.wfsb.com/Global/story.asp?S=3749220

Man remains missing after a year

NAUGATUCK -- People in Naugatuck are holding out hope in the search for a missing man a full year after his disappearance.

Hundreds gathered Sunday night on the Naugatuck green to remember 31-year-old Billy Smolinski.

He vanished last August from his home in Waterbury. There was an extensive search by police and Billy's family but it turned up nothing.

Many close to Billy feel the search should not end until it is known exactly what happened. According to some, he did not just get up and walk away because he left his dog behind.

"I would have to watch his dog or he would make arrangements," said Mary Ellen Noble a friend. "He would never leave her."

Billy's mom Jan Smolinski is also asking state legislators to create a missing person's list that her son's name could be put on.

Right now there is only a missing children's list.


monkalup - June 8, 2007 03:08 PM (GMT)
Waterbury family hopes to step up search for missing man

(Waterbury-AP, Jan. 14, 2006 3:20 PM) _ The family of a Waterbury man who has been missing for nearly a year and a half wants Governor Rell to compel local authorities to take more actively investigating his disappearance or involve the F-B-I.

More than 750 electronic signatures have been added to an online petition since it was launched two weeks ago by the ChildSeek Network in Oregon and the family of Billy Smolinski Junior.

The petition cites concern by Smolinski's family that police refuse to take the disappearance seriously.

Police say they've handled the case seriously, but cite the lack of new information or leads as hampering progress.

Smolinski, then 31, disappeared from his home in Waterbury on August 24th, 2004, leaving behind his keys, wallet, white pickup truck and German Shepherd.

Waterbury police say an investigation continues.


monkalup - June 8, 2007 03:09 PM (GMT)
Janice Smolinski, mother of missing Billy, tells about their experiences with psychics as a part of a series called "Psychics and Missing People", which is on the Project Jason Voice for the Missing blog.

http://voice4themissing.blogspot.com/2006/...of-preying.html

You may read the series from the beginning starting with this link:

http://voice4themissing.blogspot.com/2006/...ychics-and.html

Thank you.

Kelly Jolkowski, Mother of Missing Jason Jolkowski
President and Founder,
Project Jason
http://www.projectjason.org

monkalup - June 8, 2007 03:11 PM (GMT)

http://www.waterburyobserver.com

What Happened?

03/08/2006

Story By John Murray

Billy is dead.

That's what his parents think.

After 18 months of tirelessly searching for their missing 32 year old son, Janice and William Smolinski now believe Billy is dead.

"There is no body and no hard evidence," Janice Smolinski said. "But we believe a crime was committed against Billy. There are clues about what might have happened and who might be involved, but from the beginning the Waterbury Police Department has not aggressively investigated Billy's case."

Initial attempts to reach Waterbury Police spokesperson Sgt. Chris Corbett for comment came up empty. A visit to Police Chief Neil O'Leary's office brought a swift response.

O'Leary said "I would never rule out foul play. I don't think he disappeared on his own and is hiding from his family. My gut feeling is something is wrong."

Officially, the Waterbury Police Department hasn't ruled out any scenario regarding Billy's disappearance. They have cited the fact that Billy had personal problems in the days before he disappeared. He was going through a romantic break-up and had recently been laid off from one of his jobs.

O'Leary said several possibilities were explored; did Billy disappear on his own? Was there an accident and his body is still laying in the woods somewhere? Did he commit suicide? Did someone kill him?

"I wouldn't rule out any option," O'Leary said. "Something happened to that kid."
O'Leary, who is not directly involved with the investigation, called Deputy Chief Jimmy Egan into his office. He asked Egan, who supervised the Detective Bureau during a portion of the investigation, to share information about the Smolinski case with the Observer. "Give him everything we've got," O'Leary ordered. "Set up a meeting with the detectives on the case and show him everything."

And then O'Leary excused himself. He had a luncheon date with Waterbury mayor, Michael Jarjura, and was running a few minutes late.

Egan picked up where O'Leary left off.

"We have checked out every lead we've had," Egan said. "We've done as much as we can. I don't know what else we can possibly do. We have explored all the angles, we checked out everything the Smolinskis have asked us to. We have nothing."

But to Janice and William Smolinski, that claim rings hollow. They view the investigation in its entirety, not just when Jimmy Egan and new detectives were assigned to the case.

"From the first day Billy went missing we had trouble getting the Waterbury Police Department to take this case seriously," Janice said. "We begged them to finger print Billy's truck and it was never done. There was a lot of sloppy police work during this investigation, especially in the beginning."

Deputy Chief Egan confirmed that Billy's truck was never fingerprinted and said he wasn't inclined to speculate why. "I wasn't involved in the case in the beginning so I can't tell you why the truck wasn't fingerprinted," he said. "But from the time I got involved we have done everything the Smolinskis have asked us to do. We have investigated every lead that has been brought to our attention."

Egan, however, didn't get involved in the case until a year after Billy Smolinski disappeared. To date there have been six detectives who have worked the case, which is now assigned to detectives Tim Jackson and Gary Angon.

Jackson and Angon got involved after the Smolinski family met with Chief O'Leary in the summer of 2005 to discuss their frustration. He said he would assign two of his top men to the case and they would begin the investigation anew.

"We picked up the case a year after he disappeared," detective Angon said. " We look into anything we find. We have talked to everybody. We went to New York twice to look at bodies. We check the internet to see if his social security number has been used and we keep in touch with the family. We have not been able to find any physical evidence, but we are still looking."

When Billy disappeared from his home on August 24th, 2004, he left behind his truck, his keys, his wallet, and most significantly he left his beloved German Shepard, Harley, unattended and locked inside the house.

"Billy would have never left Harley like that," Janice Smolinski said. "He loved that dog."
The Smolinski family feel like they've been slamming their heads against a brick wall these past 18 months trying to convince local, state or federal investigators that Billy was the victim of a crime.

"No body, no case," said Janice Smolinski. "That's what we've heard for the past 18 months."

That is not a phrase, however, that Egan, Jackson and Angon said would have come from anyone inside the police department. "We aren't ruling out foul play," Egan said. "We just don't know what happened to Mr. Smolinski at this time. We are looking at every option."

But when all the known facts are placed on the table there are enough red flags fluttering around the case to start a flag store.

Consider this; at the time of his disappearance Billy was involved in a love triangle and had left a threatening voice message on the answering machine of his male rival telling him "to watch his back".

The male rival lives on the outskirts of greater Waterbury and is a prominent married businessman. The individual is also an elected public official with power and influence.

Consider that Billy's threatening phone call to his rival was placed the day he disappeared. The Smolinskis believe it was the last phone call Billy ever made. The Waterbury Police Department has a recording of that phone call.

As the family sees it, Billy was caught in an explosive love triangle with his girlfriend and an influential married man - a recipe for disaster. Yet the Smolinskis aren't clairvoyant and readily admit they don't know exactly what happened to Billy. They know in their hearts, though, that Billy didn't disappear on his own. The Smolinskis want Waterbury investigators to be more aggressive in probing into the two remaining pieces of the love triangle.

"We have questioned both individuals several times and do not believe either one of them was involved in Billy's disappearance," Deputy Chief Egan said.

But Janice and William Smolinski, and their daughter, Paula, don't believe the Waterbury Police Department has pursued these leads aggressively enough.

"Yes, they have been questioned," Janice Smolinski said. "But neither one of them was given a lie detector test. Why?"

Deputy Egan said the police can't force individuals to take a polygraph test, and even if they could, that the results would not be admissible in court.

When one stops to ponder several bizarre circumstances surrounding the love triangle, it is easy to see why the Smolinski family has requested further probing.

The woman Billy was dating, Madeleine Gleason, had five children and has been married and divorced three times. Four months before Billy disappeared, Madeleine's 18 year old daughter, Krystal Rapuano, hung herself in the family home in Seymour. Several months after Billy disappeared, another of Madeleine's children, Shaun M. Karpiuk, 27, died of a drug overdose in Waterbury.

At the time of his death Shaun was a construction worker with Top Gun Landscaping and had previously worked as a grave digger in Seymour.

Another of Madeleine's children, Daniel Rapuano, was in prison at the time of Billy's disappearance.

Further consider that for a year after Billy's disappearance Madeleine traveled around Woodbridge, Ansonia, Seymour and Bethany tearing down and vandalizing hundreds of Billy's missing person posters. When you add all that up, at the very least, Madeleine's family is involved with drugs, violence and death.

That Billy's male rival owns and operates a long distance trucking company only adds to the mystery and intrigue. It is not difficult to see why the Smolinskis have lingering questions.

When asked why the long distance trucking business didn't raise any red flags down at police headquarters, detective Angon told the Observer that the business only distributed vegetables to New York.

A five minute internet search, however, revealed that the business specializes in long distance freight trucking and in 2004 had $3.5 million in sales. A telephone call by the Observer to the company's sales department revealed that the company hauls freight throughout New England, over to the Hudson Valley and down to Philadelphia.

"That is a perfect example of what we have encountered throughout the investigation," Janice Smolinski said. "(The Observer) found that out in a few minutes, and the Waterbury Police Department, who have been on the case for 18 months, don't have their facts straight."

Within days of Billy's disappearance the Smolinski family was frustrated with the Waterbury Police Department and decided to take matters into their own hands. They brought in search dogs, organized their own search party and hired private investigators. They have churned the waters looking for Billy and found little more than frustration.

'There have been so many weird and unexplainable things that have happened," Janice Smolinski said. "It's bizarre, and we want the Waterbury Police Department to follow up more aggressively."

Right now the Smolinski family has only questions, no answers.

"We are frustrated with the police," Janice Smolinski said. "We don't know why they aren't following up on the bizarre events that occurred after Billy went missing. We no longer believe Billy is alive, but we want to know what happened to him, and we aren't backing down until we have an answer."

BILLY SMOLINSKI
At the time of his disappearance Billy was 31 years old. He was six feet tall and weighed 200 pounds. His friends and family describe him as physically fit, and photographs back up that assertion. He looks like a man in the prime of his life that would have no trouble taking care of business.

In August 2004 Billy was working three jobs. He was an apprentice heating and air conditioning technician at Midland Company in Newtown, he was a part-time tow truck driver for Durable Towing on Thomaston Avenue in Waterbury, and he mowed lawns and plowed driveways to scratch out extra money needed to pay his mortgage.

Leo Bianchi was Billy's boss at Durable Towing for five years. "Billy was a reliable, fast worker," Bianchi said. "If Billy told me he was going to be there, he was there. He did his job and never called in sick."

After Billy had his hours cut back at Midland, Bianchi offered Billy more hours at Durable Towing. Cash flow, it appeared, was not an issue when Billy vanished.

"I talked to Billy a few days before he disappeared," Bianchi said. "He told me he had some trouble with a girlfriend. I told him 'there are a lot of fish in the sea and don't worry about it.' Billy was a good looking kid and I told him to let it go."

Bianchi also doesn't buy into the theory that Billy voluntarily disappeared. "Billy was a tough kid and didn't take any ****," Bianchi said. "He wouldn't back down if he was up against a giant, and I think he came across the wrong person. I think someone bumped him off."

Billy was raised in Naugatuck and attended Kaynor Tech for three years where he studied to be an electrician. After his junior year Billy decided it wasn't for him, and he transferred back to Naugatuck High School for his senior year.

"After high school Billy spent a few years trying to figure himself out," Janice Smolinski said. " He drove a truck for Wesson Oil, delivered for Gary's Auto Parts and had a few other jobs."

Billy lived at home with his parents until he was 26 years old. When he moved out Billy bought his own home in the south end of Waterbury, at 130 Holly Street. Billy told his parents he didn't want to pay rent when he could start investing in his own home.

Before Billy dated Madeleine Gleason, he was involved in an eight year relationship with Mary Ellen Noble. They had known each other since high school. She said their break-up was a mutual decision and they remained close friends right up until the time Billy disappeared.

"Billy was a great guy," Noble said. "He was spontaneous, crazy and fun loving. Billy was one of those guys who didn't want to grow up."

While they were dating, Billy and Mary Ellen bought a German Shepard puppy at a breeder in Bethany and named him Harley. Mary Ellen lived with her mother in the Town Plot section of Waterbury and Billy lived in the south end of the city.

"We talked about moving in together," Noble said, "but we never figured it out. Harley would go back and forth between our homes. It was like we had joint custody of Harley, he was like our baby."

The week before Billy disappeared he went to Florida with Madeleine Gleason, and Mary Ellen came over to his house every day to take care of Harley.

"I talked with Billy when he was in Florida and he let me know he was not having a good time," Noble said. "He suspected his girlfriend was seeing another man."

Noble said she talked with Billy again when he returned home from Florida and he was upset.

"If you cheated on Billy he would take it really hard," Noble said, "A former girlfriend cheated on him and it was something he wouldn't let go of. Billy told me he had a plan to try and get Madeleine to admit the affair."

At 4:45 AM on the day Billy disappeared he placed a ladder up against Madeleine Gleason's house and knocked on her second floor bedroom window. Gleason told the Waterbury police department that she let him in and they talked.

The Waterbury police cite Billy's unusual early morning behavior as a sign he might have been losing his emotional balance. But to Mary Ellen Noble, who dated Billy for eight years, it was "just Billy being Billy. He knocked on my window many times in the middle of the night," she said. "He wouldn't think anything of it."

The Smolinski family agrees.

"Billy was always doing something like that," his sister, Paula Bell said. "The police don't know Billy the way we do. That was just Billy."

Noble believes Billy set out to have a confrontation with the man he suspected was messing around with his girlfriend. "That would be so Billy," Noble said.

The last time Mary Ellen saw Billy she said he was sad about how things were going with Madeleine, but he seemed fine, and they made plans to go to Six Flags Amusement Park the next weekend. "Billy and I had plans for that Saturday. The last words he said to me were 'Don't forget Saturday, don't forget, don't forget....'' Noble said. "Billy would not have committed suicide. I just know he wouldn't have done that. Something bad happened to him."

Billy's neighbor told the Waterbury police that the day Billy disappeared Billy had asked him to watch Harley for three days because Billy was going up north to look at a car. The following morning when the neighbor went to Billy's house to let Harley out, he couldn't find the house key. The neighbor had Mary Ellen Noble's telephone number and called her immediately.

"Right then I knew there was a big problem," Noble said. "Billy would never have left Harley locked up like that. Never."

Noble called Billy's sister, Paula, and the word spread through the Smolinski family within minutes - something strange is going on with Billy.

"When Mary Ellen called to say Billy had left Harley unattended we knew there was a problem right away," Janice Smolinski said. "We called the police, but since Billy had told the neighbor he would be gone for three days, the police insisted we wait three days before they got involved."

When Billy's sister, Paula, arrived at his house she thought it was odd where his truck was parked. "He never parked his truck at the bottom of the driveway like that," she said. "It was kind of weird, but we still didn't know what we were dealing with yet."

As family and friends convened at Billy's house, his truck was blocking the driveway, so Paula said she got in and moved it up against the house where Billy usually parked it. "I didn't think much about it at the time," she said. "But now I do."

It's possible Billy Smolinski wasn't the last driver of his truck. Several days later, in the middle of the night, Billy's truck was broken into and papers were strewn about the cab.

"We repeatedly asked the Waterbury police to fingerprint Billy's truck," Janice Smolinski said. "And by the time we finally got someone's attention (almost ten days later) they told us it was too late."

After the third day the Smolinskis followed up with the police and two detectives came down and looked around Billy's house. When they heard about Billy's problem with his girlfriend, and his job situation at Midland, they inferred to the family that it might be a suicide.

The family didn't buy it.

The Smolinskis were then told by the Waterbury police that Billy was, as Janice recalls, "out and about."

The police did eventually perform infra-red tests on his house, garage and truck, but found no signs of blood.

The week after Billy disappeared the Smolinskis used the Republican-American newspaper to recruit volunteers to help scour greater Waterbury for Billy, and 200 volunteers showed up on Saturday, Sunday and Monday of Labor Day weekend. The search began at Billy's house and fanned out from there. A psychic called the family to say that Billy had been hit on the head and was bleeding along a river bank. Although the family was skeptical about psychics, volunteers scoured every inch of the Naugatuck River from Watertown to Naugatuck. They found hobo encampments and a dead deer, but no Billy.

Billy's sister, Paula, contacted D.A.W.G.S. (Disaster and Wilderness Ground Searcher Inc), an all-volunteer search and rescue team from Canton for help. The group uses scent dogs to search for lost and missing persons, and they immediately agreed to help. D.A.W.G.S. contacted the Waterbury police to inform the department they would be forming a search in the south end, and the department sent two men to accompany the dogs and their handlers as they made their way through backyards and businesses.

'The police worked with DAWGS," William Smolinski Sr. said, "but they didn't help with the search for Billy all over Waterbury. We had more than a hundred volunteers helping out every day, but not one cop. They didn't seem to care."

Ten days after Billy disappeared his sister went down to police headquarters and said she "went a little snappy" about the lack of attention the police were giving Billy's investigation. A new detective was placed on the case, Sgt. Steve Pedbereznek, and he came down to Billy's house to have a look around.

"Within 15 minutes Steve came back in the house with Billy's keys and wallet," Paula said. "He found them tucked underneath the driver's seat in Billy's truck. Now we knew Billy was in big trouble."

THE GIRLFRIEND
Billy Smolinski met Madeline Gleason several years ago when they both drove school buses in Woodbridge. According to Billy's family, the two began dating in the summer of 2003, more than a year before Billy disappeared. Billy first brought Madeline around the family at a birthday party for his nephew.

"Billy hadn't told us how old Madeleine was," Paula Bell said. "We were all surprised when we met her because she was my mother's age."

The age difference between Billy and Madeleine was 16 years. As the Smolinskis heard more and more about Madeleine they were concerned for Billy's future. She had been married and divorced three times, had five children and was a school bus driver.

"Nobody saw what Billy saw in her," Paula said. "But I'll give her this, Billy was falling in love with her."

Ten months after Billy and Madeleine started dating, Madeleine's only daughter, Krystal, committed suicide at her home in Seymour.

"Billy felt really bad about that," Janice Smolinski said. "And he started spending even more time with Madeleine trying to comfort her."

According to the Smolinski family things between Billy and Madeleine were going pretty good through the summer of 2004. The couple was making plans for Madeleine to move into Billy's home in Waterbury.

"Madeleine didn't like the color of Billy's house and Billy asked his father to help him paint it," Janice Smolinski said. "Billy had stripped the outside of the house before he went to Florida and his father was going to help him when he got back."

The night before he left for Florida Billy brought his dirt bike over to his parent's house because he didn't want anyone to steal it while he was gone. Billy was not a traveler and liked to stay close to home. The last time he was on an airplane was when he was 15 years old and the family flew down to Disney World.

"Billy was apprehensive about flying," Janice Smolinski said. "He borrowed our luggage and we talked about the sites to see around Jupiter Beach. He seemed very happy."

From police accounts, and talking to several of Billy's family and friends, it is clear that the relationship took a hard turn for the worse while Billy and Madeleine were in Florida.

Billy was upset at Madeleine's secretive behavior with her cell phone in Florida - he caught her talking in shower stalls - and he suspected she was in an affair.

The Waterbury police department confirmed that Billy and Madeleine had been arguing in Florida, and on the plane ride home. When they returned home from Florida, Billy talked to his sister and with Mary Ellen Noble. He told them both that he was having problems with Madeleine.

"He told me he had broken up with her," Paula said. "Billy said he was through with her."
Billy told his boss down at Durable Towing that he was devastated.

What really goes on in the mind and heart of a young man coping with loss and disappointment is unclear, but one thing that is certain is that Billy Smolinski was angry with the individual he thought Madeleine was having an affair with. Billy knew the man, and telephone records show that he called him three times the day he disappeared.

The man is a prominent business owner and politician in Woodbridge. According to Deputy Chief Egan the individual was contacted weeks after Billy disappeared and voluntarily brought in his answering machine to police headquarters and shared the threatening message with investigators.

Billy's sister went down to headquarters and listened to the recording and confirmed that it was her brother's voice on the machine.

"He said 'Watch your back, I'm going to get you," Paula said. "It was very short, but it was definitely Billy's voice."

Paula said after listening to the tape she knew Billy had gone to confront the individual and something bad had happened. "Billy was not afraid of confrontation," Paula said. "If you listen to that message you know something happened after that."

The Smolinskis know that Billy was caught in a love triangle, and they also know that Billy would have sought a confrontation.

His father, William, said "Billy wasn't one to start anything, but if someone started something with him, he would finish it. This time it looks like someone got the better of him."

Despite all the indications leading towards a confrontation, for the past 18 months the Waterbury police department had publicly stated that they suspected no foul play in Billy's disappearance.

In a Republican-American article written by Brynn Mandel one year after Billy disappeared, she wrote that "police believe that neither foul play nor medical issues are factors in Billy's disappearance. They noted his job loss and relationship difficulty."

When Janice Smolinski contacted the television show "America's Most Wanted" about broadcasting news about Billy's disappearance, the show's producers contacted the Waterbury police department about the case and were told that investigators didn't suspect any foul play. Unable to run a segment without cooperation from local police, and with no suspected foul play, Billy's story never made the national broadcast.

"At first the police thought it might be a suicide," Janice Smolinski said. "Then they said he was out and about and would probably come home eventually."

That was 18 months ago. Now, in March 2006, the Smolinskis don't think Billy is ever coming back.

The first person inside police headquarters to publicly state that foul play was a possibility is Police Chief Neil O'Leary, who did so during an interview with the Observer on March 2nd.

"We can't rule it out," O'Leary said. 'My gut feeling is something is wrong here."

UNEXPECTED ARREST
Weeks after Billy disappeared the Smolinski family paid the New Haven Register $1200 to print 20,000 flyers that were to be distributed in the newspaper. The family printed a few thousand more flyers which they planned to distribute in restaurants, businesses and in public areas around the state of Connecticut. Several odd occurrences with the flyers began to raise some eyebrows within the Smolinski family.

First, not every town that was supposed to get the flyer, received them. During the first distribution run, strangely, the family said, the town of Woodbridge didn't get the insert in their editions of the Register. The Smolinskis have many friends in Woodbridge who reported that they didn't get the flyer. The Smolinskis complained and the Register promised to re-run the flyer in a few communities, including Woodbridge. This time, once again, the flyers didn't make it into most of Woodbridge.

Why would these raise concerns with the Smolinskis? Because the other two angles of the love triangle work or live in the town of Woodbridge.

At the same time the Smolinskis were having trouble getting the flyers distributed in Woodbridge, a good friend of the family telephoned Janice and said she had witnessed a woman ripping down posters of Billy off utility poles in Amity. The family friend wrote down the woman's license plate number and gave it to Janice. Using an inside connection in law enforcement the Smolinskis had the plate number checked and were stunned when it turned out to be Madeleine Gleason's car. This was a month after Billy vanished.

"We were shocked," Janice Smolinski said. "We couldn't understand why anyone would want to rip down Billy's posters, but his girlfriend? It was bizarre. Why would she do that?"

The Smolinskis investigated and found dozens of posters in Woodbridge, Bethany, Ansonia and Seymour disfigured, shredded or missing. The family placed thousands of posters around Connecticut and the only place they were being vandalized was in the area Madeline Gleason lived and worked in. The Smolinskis decided to replace the posters and asked the private investigators to watch and see what happened.

"They said they couldn't just sit and stare at a pole for days waiting to see if someone came," Janice Smolinski said. "So we decided to do it ourselves."

The first shift was manned by Billy's aunt and uncle, Grace and Bruce Smolinski. During their first shift they were stunned to witness Madeline Gleason and her son pull up to a pole and rip down a poster. They attempted to videotape the moment and experienced difficulty with the zoom, focus and exposure. But the tape clearly shows the pair tearing down Billy's poster.

The Smolinski family replaced the posters and the next night they were torn down again. This time Paula was in the car with her aunt and uncle and they videotaped the incident for a second night.

"We brought the tape down to the Waterbury Police Department and they didn't have much to say about it," Janice Smolinski said. "We didn't understand their reaction, but we continued to keep them informed."

Frustrated they couldn't snag the attention of the Waterbury Police Department, the Smolinskis were determined to engage Madeleine's increasingly bizarre behavior. They believed she knew something about Billy's disappearance and they intended to find out what. Thus began a daily cat and mouse game. The Smolinski family would go around Woodbridge, Seymour, Ansonia and Bethany every day and re hang Billy's posters on telephone poles. Every night they were torn down This went on for several months until Janice noticed one day that the posters were disappearing within minutes, in broad daylight.

"Madeleine and her friend, (Frances Vrabel), started following me and eventually started ripping the posters down right in front of my face," Janice Smolinski said. 'It was a huge insult and I wasn't going to coil back and go home and forget about."

Madeleine's in-your face tactic riled up a soft-spoken woman. "She had the nerve to do that right in my face and I was determined that I wasn't going to back down. I just kept hanging Billy's posters and went about my business. When she tore them down I put up another."

Eventually Paula and Janice witnessed Madeleine and Frances, who are both school bus drivers in Woodbridge, stopping their buses to get out and destroy Billy's posters. Paula shot videotape of the women, and while she was filming Madeleine began to follow them in an empty school bus.

"We couldn't believe what we were watching," Paula said. "Madeleine never helped search for Billy when he went missing. Why was she doing this?"

The bizarre behavior continued almost daily until April 2005 when Madeleine pulled the bus into the Woodbridge Police parking lot. Paula and Janice saw an opportunity to confront Madeleine's behavior with the police, and they followed her inside.

Once inside the police station both Paula and Janice state that Madeleine taunted them, saying that if she had married Billy she would have referred to Janice as "Mommy." After a few "Mommy, Mommy, Mommy" taunts, Paula blew a fuse and lunged at Madeleine and said she was going to kill her. By the time the Woodbridge police sorted through the tangled raw emotion, according to the Smolinskis, they were under threat of arrest on five different charges.

The police report states that Gleason complained that the Smolinskis "have been smothering the areas along her bus route, in front of her residence, the bank she frequents and now at a gym she just joined. Gleason stated that she has been tearing down