http://forums.mtgsalvation.com/showthread.php?t=17797

Some good info but I find that what he knows about the decks that are good but did not win anything lacking.
What is this sentence suppose to mean?

Wtf are you trying to say about this article? He's just writing the equivalent of the wizard's boards faq for salvation.

lol deathspark

I remember when I could post on mtgsalvation =/

Do you miss it much?

I registered there, mainly to post a link for them.


I'm responding to Lunar's article.

@law: What is that sentence suppose to mean? Seriously.

He lacks adequate understanding of the tier 1 decks.

No he lacks the understanding of many of the budget decks is what I ment.

I re-reg'd.

Most of the mods did like me, so I dunno.

We shall see.

THe article was ok for breif discussion, as well as a being a palatable means of unveiling decklists, but I would have liked more critical discussion of the decks + more appropriate lists.

And christ, salvation posters are fucktards.

Well yeah, ABS doesn't exactly have a monopoly on the magic world. But I think he does the right thing by focusing on high power decks, which are generally what you'll see at tournaments.

They didn't like my creative writing

Exactly how many times have you been banned from salvation?



What was your last post suppose to mean? I'm lost.

Well pip he just could have noted a bigger part of budget decks. But I think he does not know many of the good budget decks that are out there. So yes he did the right thing buy focuing on the big bad decks of type one. Those are the decks a deck should crush if you want a deck thats different.

I do think I peaked his intreased about r/g tempo. If I can get him to see that its more then r/g beats then well I did something good.

Three times.

My last post meant that I wrote the bible.