It seems obvious that when the truth comes out, it will much more resemble what Dylan suggests than the 9-11 Commission's tale told by a drunken man. Still, it has always stood out as a strange anomaly that if the Bushies set up the false flag of 9-11, why didn't they cut out the middleman and have the hijackers appear to be Iraqis? I have never seen any mention of this in any Truth sites. The war the neocons REALLY wanted in the first place would have been made-to-order without the tortured pretense of WMDs before the UN Security Council. Besides, with Arabs as the evildoers, it seems to strain the one tight relationship Bush had in the middle east. (Who can forget the nice hand-holding photos?) What can be the reason for using Arabs as the straw dogs, if it was all a fabrication?
Or is this a fly in the soup?

The "War on Terror" is much bigger than Iraq. Remember, the Bush Administration continually stressed that this war will last decades and generations. Iraq is just their second stage in a much larger plan they have already worked out. So, ultimately, it doesn't matter the country of origin that the "hijackers" originated from. They had faith in the fact that the American people by and large would not question that the "hijackers" came from Saudi Arabia, rather than the countries we invaded,.. and you know what,. they were right,. the American people and the media failed to question it.

However, and this is just my guess, I believe that they chose to make most if not all the hijackers from Saudi Arabia because if these individuals had been from Iraq, then the Iraqi government could have done an investigation into those individuals to see if they even exist, and if there was any foul play suspected, the Iraqi government could potentially expose that foul play. Since the United States is in bed with Saudi Arabia, the Saudi government could potentially play along with the U.S. and have each hijackers identity completely fabricated,. without the chance for that information being exposed, as they would protect one another,. as seen when Bush censored many pages of the Commission report that discussed possible connections with the Saudis.

Thanks for the reply, rydog. Hmm. Yes, this makes sense. It does seem a bit off-track for a notoriously unprepared (albeit persistent and devious) team of plotters. But your explanation would make sense.

Or what actually happened is that a bunch of psychos from Saudi Arabia flew planes into the Twin Towers.

The NeoCons took it as an opportunity, tried to connect it to Iraq (the place with the money), failed, alienated our allies, and, through amazing incompetence, slogged us down in one of the most embarassing foreign policy disasters in our nation's history.

Turns out their nation of origin did matter as the failure to find a link is what put us in our current situation without any allies. Remember how many nations helped us in Afghanistan?

But, of course, we are the all-powerful country of countries. Even the laws of physics bend in out presence. I guess there's a sinister reason, not simply bone-chilling incompetence, behind our bed-shitting in Iraq...

you do realise that iraqis are arabs yeh ???

Ha, .. yes,. I know it's similar to when people ask "Are you Canadian or American?"

That always killed me.

i think i've asked that question before!!!. do you guys get offended when you're asked that?. i know canadians don't dig it so much.

Yes, it happens alot,. especially in the northern bordering states like Michigan. I've never been offended, but if I'm feeling a bit snarky,. you could reply "Both!",. and watch as they scratch their heads. It's amazing that when we think of Americans,.. we forget that it doesn't just include the United States but an entire continents worth of people,. y'know.

to really freak someone out, you remind them that arabs live in asia