Are you able to create groups on these forums? If so, create a hidden group that members who are here to help can post in threads only available for serious discussions between members. This site is infested with people who are here to cause problems and throw topics off track.

I'm an admin on another site and I created a similar hidden group option that works wonders!

Interesting concept. I would like to learn more.

Let's get it going and you will. :)

Just imagine, there won't be tools like e^n pushing the official story down our throats after we post our thoughts.

Hope i dont get banned for this or what not... on www.politicalcrossfire.com where i frequent there are group forums for the political parties. Its rather help full to usher in educated debate with like minded people. Just using that as an exsample if the admins want to check it out.

Bump up the jam!

To PeterRabit- I think it's a good concept. Contact an Admin. But E^N is not an offical story pusher. He's a truther, not your average truther.

Me-Are you a truther
E-I am not a typical 'truther', I don't believe in explosive demolition and I do believe that AA77 hit the pentagon.

You have to respect the fact that he is a truther despite that he doesnt agree with CD. Don't fight and make fun because he's a "different" truther.

I'm not going to take his word, I don't see how believing that 77 did or didn't hit the pentagon makes you a truther. That's the official story and he pushes it.

Bottom line, the truth movement demands a new investigation and he wants us to believe NIST, end of story. Anyone who wants to limit the movement, is not a part of the movement, period.

If he doesn't believe in the no plane theory and the controlled demolition theory then does he base his evidence soley on pre-9/11 and UA93?

Who in there right mind believes no aircraft hit the towers? :blink: Seriously?

Truthers should all agree on one thing: We don't know the truth about 911. This is the whole point of wanting a new investigation.

Where exactly does this e^n stand when it comes to the truth movement? Because I have yet to see anything by him/her supporting what the truth movement represents.

I know what groups are and how they work, but the problem is you cannot categorise everyone into a specific group. This subject of 9-11 truth is a journey and most people have different positions about all the different aspects of the whole subject and as they read and view more information about the various events they often shift their opinions about these parts.

It would be impossible to manage groups in this detail as new movies, evidence, witnesses and info comes out, lots of people would shift their positions, and you would finish up with no planers in the space weapons groups and no passengers people in the no Israeli involvement group.. etc..

The only way it would work would be if you survey everyone with their current opinions before they log in and enter the group.