View Full Version: Election Of 08

Loose Change Forum > Polls, Votes, Petitions, Surveys > Election Of 08



Title: Election Of 08
Description: Second 9/11 investigation


Gohokies07 - April 10, 2007 06:18 AM (GMT)
Which candidate that is either considering or running for president in '08 will open a second investigation into 9/11, exposing all the facts, hiding nothing from the public eye, and prosecuting those guilty of high treason and crimes against humanity? So far I have e-mailed four candidates (Obama, Clinton, Giuliani and McCain), and all of them ignored the question.

chucksheen - April 10, 2007 06:19 AM (GMT)

thehighwaymanq - April 10, 2007 06:35 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (chucksheen @ Apr 10 2007, 02:19 AM)
http://RonPaul.org

http://Kucinich.us

amen

IVXX - April 10, 2007 06:38 AM (GMT)
Choice 10 needs to be changed. How about "None cause it's not an issue to them"?? I even have my doubts Ron Paul will push for a new investigation.

Dr. Kissinger - April 10, 2007 10:37 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (IVXX @ Apr 10 2007, 01:38 AM)
Choice 10 needs to be changed. How about "None cause it's not an issue to them"?? I even have my doubts Ron Paul will push for a new investigation.

exactly. I have my doubts about Ron Paul too. Kucinich seems like the only one who would re-open the investigation, but I wont hold my breath.

openmind - April 12, 2007 03:43 AM (GMT)
I believe that no matter who is elected nothing will change. I think they are all puppets of something larger. Check out the whole theory about strawman and how the federal reserve banks were formed and who OWNS them. Not the government!.

Also look at who is making TRILLIONS of $$ when a war breaks out. I think 9/11 was all about getting America into a war for the long term to make certain people tons of $$.

It is the international bankers that run the world and govt's.

Any leader who tries to reform all of this will be killed.

So just learn to deal with how life is since changing it will only get you killed or waste you time.

Live life to the fullest and enjoy it while you can before everything is gone.

~John

SonOfLiberty - April 21, 2007 05:14 AM (GMT)
I would have voted for Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo if they were in the poll, had to go with none.

Obama has a lot of people fooled, right now anyway.

None of the 'mainstream' candidates are worthy IMO, none.

seeker135 - April 21, 2007 06:33 AM (GMT)

Obama has a lot of people fooled, right now anyway





Please explain.

style - April 21, 2007 06:53 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (seeker135 @ Apr 21 2007, 06:33 AM)
Obama has a lot of people fooled, right now anyway





Please explain.

the "elite" appear to be making a push for obama, which means that he is compromised.

the fooled part of it has to do with the fact that he's being "promoted" as an alternative to hillary when they're really both one in the same.

SonOfLiberty - April 21, 2007 11:27 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (seeker135 @ Apr 21 2007, 02:33 AM)
Obama has a lot of people fooled, right now anyway





Please explain.

What Style said, plus that he is a media darling right now, but that will wear off, it's a long road yet to any Primaries. I don't think he has an agenda or anything.
He is the first truly viable, electable black candidate IMO. Not that it is an issue with me, but the name thing will even be an issue; Barack Hussein Obama....like Bill Maher said would people vote for Charles Manson Hitler :huh:

I am for Hunter or Tancredo, and can't think of a better team as Pres. and VP.
Just the fact that they are being totally ignored by mainstream media means they would be dangerous to the status quo.
Each of these men have a solid following, they are raising money, they get large crowds that give standing ovations, but no media attention to speak of.

Gohokies07 - April 25, 2007 07:37 PM (GMT)
I have tried to contact every candidate but none of them seem to care and respond with an automatic message that they are too busy answering everybody else. That is nonsense.

alive and still talking - May 6, 2007 01:51 AM (GMT)
candidates will have to promise invesigation to get elected

Tim Riches - May 6, 2007 04:48 PM (GMT)
Ron Paul

Gremlin - May 7, 2007 04:37 PM (GMT)
I think shutting down the Federal Reserve, revoking the 16th, and taking the debt out of the dollar by federalizing it is much more important then a new investigation.

The Public will eventually invoke a true investigation on 9/11, that is inevitable.
The government still has the power to rectify the 16th and Federal Reserve, and has the most cut and dry case for the action. Our theories about 9/11 have not been proven, the fraud of the Federal Reserve has long been proven.

Illuminazi - May 14, 2007 12:01 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gremlin @ May 7 2007, 11:37 AM)
QUOTE
I think shutting down the Federal Reserve, revoking the 16th, and taking the debt out of the dollar by federalizing it is much more important then a new investigation.

The Public will eventually invoke a true investigation on 9/11, that is inevitable.
The government still has the power to rectify the 16th and Federal Reserve, and has the most cut and dry case for the action. Our theories about 9/11 have not been proven, the fraud of the Federal Reserve has long been proven.


Spot on Gremlin. Unless the Fed is abolished there will never ever be any difference at all in the policies of the USA. Abolish the Fed, repeal the 16th, and outlaw "fractional reserve banking" for eternity; confiscate all the fortunes amassed on the strength of all the above, and you could feed and clothe the whole world tomorrow and forever. All our wars, all our famines, all our strife, they are ALL avoidable. The only reason they never are is because of the very simple premise that you can't have rich without also having poor.

Forget about 9/11. It will never be solved unless the day comes when a hero to all men actually abolishes the Fed. When that happens, the whole house of cards will come tumbling down. Until it happens, nothing will change. Well, one thing will - the lies and deceit will get even more obvious, even more blatant. But there will be no truth and no justice - quite simply because the Fed is at the centre of 9/11 and everything else. Instead of looking at 9/11 and other incidents, follow them back to source and follow what that source is doing. Look to the imminent unveiling of the North American Union and the demise of the dollar, to be replaced by the Amero, slated for 2010. Another piece of sleight-of-hand robbery of the American middle classes by the bankers. Beyond 2010, look for the NAU to then merge, with the EU, the SAU, the AU and so on, into a Federalist Global Superstate, ruled by a one world government headed by the very people who own the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the World Bank, BIS, IMF, EU Central Bank, etc etc etc.

"The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough money to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they OUGHT to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." - Sir Josiah Stamp, former Director of the Bank of England, 1940

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards world government. The supra national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller, at the 1991 Bilderbergers meeting

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only questions is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." - Paul Warburg (architect of the Federal Reserve System), to the US Senate, 1950

QUOTE
I think shutting down the Federal Reserve, revoking the 16th, and taking the debt out of the dollar by federalizing it is much more important then a new investigation.

The Public will eventually invoke a true investigation on 9/11, that is inevitable.
The government still has the power to rectify the 16th and Federal Reserve, and has the most cut and dry case for the action. Our theories about 9/11 have not been proven, the fraud of the Federal Reserve has long been proven.


Spot on Gremlin. Unless the Fed is abolished there will never ever be any difference at all in the policies of the USA. Abolish the Fed, repeal the 16th, and outlaw "fractional reserve banking" for eternity; confiscate all the fortunes amassed on the strength of all the above, and you could feed and clothe the whole world tomorrow and forever. All our wars, all our famines, all our strife, they are ALL avoidable. The only reason they never are is because of the very simple premise that you can't have rich without also having poor.

Forget about 9/11. It will never be solved unless the day comes when a hero to all men actually abolishes the Fed. When that happens, the whole house of cards will come tumbling down. Until it happens, nothing will change. Well, one thing will - the lies and deceit will get even more obvious, even more blatant. But there will be no truth and no justice - quite simply because the Fed is at the centre of 9/11 and everything else. Instead of looking at 9/11 and other incidents, follow them back to source and follow what that source is doing. Look to the imminent unveiling of the North American Union and the demise of the dollar, to be replaced by the Amero, slated for 2010. Another piece of sleight-of-hand robbery of the American middle classes by the bankers. Beyond 2010, look for the NAU to then merge, with the EU, the SAU, the AU and so on, into a Federalist Global Superstate, ruled by a one world government headed by the very people who own the Federal Reserve, the Bank of England, the World Bank, BIS, IMF, EU Central Bank, etc etc etc.

"The bankers own the earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the power to create money, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough money to buy it back again. However, take away from them the power to create money, and all the great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they OUGHT to disappear, for this would be a happier and better world to live in. But, if you wish to remain the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, let them continue to create money." - Sir Josiah Stamp, former Director of the Bank of England, 1940

"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NY Times, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But now the world is more sophisticated and prepared to march towards world government. The supra national sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller, at the 1991 Bilderbergers meeting

"We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only questions is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent." - Paul Warburg (architect of the Federal Reserve System), to the US Senate, 1950

Paul3 - May 15, 2007 07:16 PM (GMT)
Ron Paul is the only one that would take the power from the government and give it back to the people.

alive and still talking - May 19, 2007 09:49 PM (GMT)
agreed, too bad he's a republican--needs to run as an independent
the word "republican" on his profile will defeat him

Blue Balloon - May 30, 2007 07:21 PM (GMT)
I agree that the list does not include anyone strong enough to motivate a "real" investigation into what truly led up to and enabled the events of September 11, 2001.

Only an organized and enraged J. Q. Public could. Where are the 50 million plus Americans from the 2004 Presidential Vote; we all remember, the ones cast against the Bush Regime? (The candidate Bush, on the phone that night, "You make that state RED dammit!", pointing out the Ohio gambit.)

I hate to think that we are all talking unintelligently on our cell phones while driving our gas-guzzling freedom-mobiles to another sheep-counting night of terror...

Personally, I can hold my breath for 3 minutes and 28 seconds; that is just not long enough.

PS: I have vonluntarily refused to buy an automobile for nearly 14 years now, and I will never own a cell-phone, but there are nightmares every night, regardless.

btbalance - May 31, 2007 01:58 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Gremlin @ May 7 2007, 04:37 PM)
I think shutting down the Federal Reserve, revoking the 16th, and taking the debt out of the dollar by federalizing it is much more important then a new investigation.

The Public will eventually invoke a true investigation on 9/11, that is inevitable.
The government still has the power to rectify the 16th and Federal Reserve, and has the most cut and dry case for the action. Our theories about 9/11 have not been proven, the fraud of the Federal Reserve has long been proven.

Exactly.

I think any President that stands out of the way of an investigation would be a good President.. I believe Congress would have to initiate the investigation..

but there are actually more important things to take care of as you said..

Ron Paul all day long... he's the only choice really. I'm afraid of the Hillary/Obama push... first woman or first black are huge selling points for many people, unfortunately..

alive and still talking - June 7, 2007 10:19 PM (GMT)
MIKE GRAVEL AND RON PAUL why did you not include them?




Hosted for free by InvisionFree