Boeing Fitting Aircraft With Illegal Parts?
Chip that was illegally installed in 2000 could have been utilized to execute 9/11 attacks

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones
Prison Planet
Wednesday, March 7, 2007

Are Boeing fitting their aircraft with illegal devices that could enable terrorists to remotely hijack airliners and crash them into high profile targets? In light of what happened on 9/11, Boeing's blanket denial that this practice has taken place is both highly suspicious and a threat to national security.

We talked to airline industry representatives to ask them if such technology had been installed in commercial airliners and they denied all knowledge, despite the fact that Boeing were hit with a record fine of $15 million after the company broke the law by selling commercial planes equipped with the QRS-11 gyrochip, which is also used in the guidance system of the Maverick missile.

According to the Associated Press, from 2000 to 2003 Boeing shipped 94 airliners oversees, mainly to China, that contained the chip, a device used for "military applications," stated the report.

According to the Seattle Times, "The QRS-11 chip, made by a unit of BEI Technologies in Concord, Calif., is just over 1-½ inches in diameter and weighs about 2 ounces. It sells for between $1,000 and $2,000. Described as "a gyro on a chip," it is used to help control the flight of missiles and aircraft."

"There could be dozens, even hundreds more components like the QRS11 gyros that have slipped under the eyes of State Department enforcers, said Joel Johnson, the vice president international of the Aerospace Industries Association," reports the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and "Aircraft incorporating the QRS11 chips are already routinely making flights."

Should it concern us that Boeing began installation of a chip that turns a plane into a remotely guided missile immediately before 9/11?
(snip)
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/march...llegalparts.htm
------------------------------------------------------------
Listen to Alex Jones' interview with military/commercial pilot Field McConnell on 03/07/07at http://www.realradioarchives.com/sound-2.htm

there's a chance this report is true, but I would like to ask whether Boeing stocks went down after 9/11, just as AA and UA did. Why would Boeing agree to have their planes used if their stocks might plummet? Or could they have installed the parts and not known what they would be used for?

More questions... always more questions.

The answer to your question depends on whether the management of Boeing knew beforehand that their planes would be used in a false-flag black op. Personally, I don't believe this was necessary. The QRS11 gyrochips could have been added without senior management ever ever dreaming that they could turn their planes into missiles if the wrong people took control. But that was the real reason why they were fitted, not the commercial selling point that it enables any authority on the ground to take control of their plane if hijackers ever took it over. And of course it explains how the 9/11 planes could have been remote-controlled. Now Boeing has been fined $15 million for selling its commercial planes with a component that helps terrorists on the ground to take electronic control of them, it is not really suspicious that they are now in denial. The cat is out of the bag and they are embarrassed that people know about it.

that's what I meant by my comment "could they have installed the chips not knowing what they might be used for". so I think we agree.

It doesn't really matter, they can modify the aircraft however they wish, they don't need for Boeing to actually install it for them.