Hi This is my first post having recently watched Loose Change after seeing the show about 9/11 on BBC 2 over here a few weeks back so sorry if this may have been discussed before

One thing that gets me about the idea behind Loose Change is that its premise is that the government of the United States, was at the very least, criminally negligient in allowing the attacks of September 11th, 2001 to occur.

I don't see how the film could possibly look at the evidence in any other way than to back up its premise. So for me its a flawed piece of work as you cant look into things when the premise of it is actually something that should be its conclusion if it finds enough evidence to back up that argument.

I caught that too. Dylan claims it's either one of two options. Surely not. If you have proof that they comitted the crimes as suggested then it can't be criminal negligence.

you have to prove the first point to even move too the second point

far easier too show the facts and let people make their own mind up
after that its just a matter of time for the truth too tell

Watergate being a classic case to view in this regard ...

Check this out... 9/11 is an inside job! You live in a fake world... Deal with it.

Thank Ed you cleared that up for me...