Title: Has This Come Up?
zdux0012 - February 6, 2007 06:33 AM (GMT)
I was just thinking, I don't know if this point has been made.
We've all heard the story about the magic passport. Also that none of the "hijacker" names match the flight list. Well,, the name on the passport also doesn't match the flight list.
If Atta did bring the passport then he would have used it. In fact if he planned on not using it, it would have been safer to leave it behind.
This leads me to only 1 conclusion: Not only is the government evil, they are also really stupid.
antipodean - February 6, 2007 07:09 AM (GMT)
Being a foreigner it would be handy for him to have his passport with him for ID purposes etc.
But it's laughable that it should be found amongst the WTC wreckage along with no other ID from the passengers.
The fact they say 'hey we've found Atta's passport he must have been aboard the plane' , yet his name isn't on the flight manifests, is just another hole in the official conspiracy theory.
whatup - February 6, 2007 11:03 AM (GMT)
:blink:
Of course their names are on the flight manifests. Have you even seen the flight manifests?!? :blink:
Nappy - February 6, 2007 11:13 PM (GMT)
No. they have not seen the flight manifests. they saw a preliminary victims list on CNN.com...that did not list the hijackers as victims. the hijackers were not victims..they were perpetrators.
zdux0012 - February 7, 2007 07:15 AM (GMT)
As I understand it. The people on the flights names' were realeased very quickly by the airlines. At this point there would be no way to know who hijacked the planes.
The names were released by the FBI again later there was descrepency over 1 name. Supposedly someone bought 2 seats and 1 person didn't show.
Furthermore if there was any evidance of these guys on a security camera in one of the airports they would have blasted on the news already. I guess they didn't think of that when cooking up evidance.
behind - February 7, 2007 02:25 PM (GMT)
look-up - February 12, 2007 09:23 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Nappy @ Feb 6 2007, 11:13 PM) |
| No. they have not seen the flight manifests. they saw a preliminary victims list on CNN.com...that did not list the hijackers as victims. the hijackers were not victims..they were perpetrators. |
the hijackers were perpetrators only if the official version of events is true, which it is not. the hijackers chould have had no idea what was going to happen.
behind - March 11, 2007 04:37 AM (GMT)
About the passanger manifest... then Hoffman call it "reproductions"
Low-quality reproductions of alleged passenger manifests were released on a website of Moussaoui trial exhibits in July of 2006
911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/passengers.htmlSee also interesting article from Gerard Holmegren mostly about flight 11 (how the names and number changed)
www.911closeup.com/index.shtml?ID=65