Title: Ron Paul Completely Ignored In The London Times!
Description: [Photos included]
Description: [Photos included]
Barcoded - January 14, 2008 05:12 PM (GMT)
In all the graphs, polls and charts, Ron Paul doesn't not get one single mention. I took these photos with my phone from the newspaper (The Times...owned by Rupert Murdoch) a few days ago because it angered me so much. It is so blatant that they have purposefully left him out.
Table 1 - Iowa Results
We all know 'Paul got 10% in the poll and came ABOVE Guiliani, so why is it that he is not listed here?
Table 2 - New Hampshire Results
Again, we all know 'Paul didnt do aswell this time whether it was fraud or not BUT we do know he came ABOVE Thompson, so why does his name not even appear in the table??
Overall page photo if anyones interested, I dont think its all readable, worth a look though.
-Rich
Table 1 - Iowa Results
We all know 'Paul got 10% in the poll and came ABOVE Guiliani, so why is it that he is not listed here?
Table 2 - New Hampshire Results
Again, we all know 'Paul didnt do aswell this time whether it was fraud or not BUT we do know he came ABOVE Thompson, so why does his name not even appear in the table??
Overall page photo if anyones interested, I dont think its all readable, worth a look though.
-Rich
Reggie_perrin - January 14, 2008 05:48 PM (GMT)
Ron Paul has been thrown down what George Orwell would describe as 'the memory hole', he no longer exists.
Thanks for the clippings.
Thanks for the clippings.
Barcoded - January 14, 2008 06:21 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Reggie_perrin @ Jan 14 2008, 05:48 PM) |
| Ron Paul has been thrown down what George Orwell would describe as 'the memory hole', he no longer exists. Thanks for the clippings. |
Long time since I read 1984, I'll have to use that line more often in posts :P
mynameis - January 15, 2008 08:11 PM (GMT)
Sickening.