View Full Version: South Carolina Debate

Loose Change Forum > Ron Paul 2008 > South Carolina Debate



Title: South Carolina Debate
Description: who WON...>?


888LetsRoll - January 11, 2008 10:56 AM (GMT)
As I have said before, I dont agree with about 30% Ron Stands for but the 70% I feel whole heartedly he is my President.
and what these people are doing is purely UnAmerican.
dirty tricks, power plays, and Ron Is just letting them do it... If he cant start leading - I will have to look elsewhere for leadership because - if we are winning and they still fail to tell the people those facts -- then not only is it time for Revolution, it is mandated by our Constitution... Where do we begin...
I say lets go the extra 100 yards, we are going to have to shake hands for Mr. President if we are going to beat these guys the American way... Mobilize

One Problem, I feel the current establishment wants this to happen... So damned if we do damned if we dont... they are looking forward to what comes...
what a shame ... we dont have any other properties on earth to occupy and protect.

In addition, It appears these groups of people are confused about the powers contained within the Constitution. We should seek to educate people of the contents of our governing documents. If we leave it up to FOX we will be speaking Spanish as our national language.

datman - January 11, 2008 10:56 PM (GMT)
I don't know who won but from what I watch it was not Ron Paul. I think it's a shame because he is not very good at debates. Anyone who sees him only on the debates and does not research any of his videos where the commentators are not hostile toward him. Never hear his true message.

There was the part where he was asked about the Iran speed boat incident and his answer was right on. He said he would be more cautious in jumping to conclusions about what it was about and not start ww3 over something the intelligences are wrong about. The commentator set him up and said "but everyone who has spoken has said the would be cautious. He lost it and looked very bad. If only he had said anything, like your definition of caution must be different that mine.
as much as I like him. I don't know if most will think he is " presidential" They would much rather elect a bullshit artist. That way they can hold on to the illusion that everything is just peachy

Andoo Inc. - January 12, 2008 05:25 PM (GMT)
It hit me like a sack of rocks yesterday. He's just too small and doesn't compensate for it. There is no hope. We need someone bigger and won't be laughed at too hard when he retorts with big arms pointing like he is gonna woop some ass after the debates. Ron Paul doesn't seem to care much.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree