..don't you think its a bit strange that no one has come forward.

We must be talking about a team in its 100's if not 1000's if these buildings were rigged in precision collapes within 2 weeks. No one has been driven by guilt to come forward or have told their loved ones what they've done.

Just a thought that I have had on my mind everytime someone says they were rigged to blow.

Love final cut by the way!

Phantasium

Why 100's or 1,000's and why 2 weeks? Why would you assume that the psychopaths responsible for wiring a building have a conscience? And, if you were conscience-free psychopath, would you confess to murder of 3,000 people and untold financial destruction? Gee, I know I would. :wacko:

Everybody who's seen this approach before...raise your hands!

Somehow I think if I was that overcome by guilt, I'd be putting a gun to my head rather than asking my family to participate in the consequences of my confessing to involvement in the murder of 3,000+ innocent people.

It's simply amazing how skeptics convey such ludicrous expectations without, apparently, giving any thought to the ramifications of a guilty participant going public.

MM

I figured they could be hired terrorists that think they are doing their leaders a favor by doing it.

To think a secret group in the military could rig TWO 110 story buildings without being noticed is absurd. This whole "thermite" stuff is garbage too. Have you ever heard of a building being imploded by thermite?

Insightful. :rolleyes: Thanks.

Any would-be 9/11 whistleblower will simply be ignored by the mainstream media, and the story will die out for lack exposure. If ignoring the whistleblower somehow doesn't work, they could always resort to smear and swiftboat tactics. On top of all that, it still boils down to his word against the govt's.

I doubt any 9/11 perp would have the stomach let alone the conscience to go through all that. If they had a conscience they wouldn't have participated in the crime in the first place. The mainstream media has been instrumental in the cover-up of 9/11, so history shows that is exactly what they would do to any would-be perp-turned whistleblower .

None of this "evidence" actually means anything. These movies are a joke. It committed probably every logical fallacy I know of, and I'd wager some I don't know of. The movie has no qualms about contradicting itself.

How quickly did Monica and Bills affair get out? And the supposed deliberate killing of thousands of Americans can be kept secret? Haha.

"Once you have eliminated the impossible, whatever is left, however unlikely, must be the truth." - Sir Arthur Conan Doyle a.k.a. "Sherlock Holmes"

We know they were demolished. We have eliminated the impossible, the official theory of collapse, and therefore what is left, demolition, must be true, no matter how hard it is for you to visualize or comprehend.

Ever heard of a steel building collapsing in on itself at freefall speed from a few small fires like WTC 7 did?

Who ever said that the fires in WTC7 were small?

Chief palmer, who made it to the impact zone and said" isolated pockets of fire"

also, just because something had not been impoloded using thermite in the past, does not mean ANYTHING regarding two 110 story buildings, which were the first high-rises of their size to ever be demolished.

with that much steel, you'd have to use some thermite.

nevermind that there was molten metal underneath the rubble.

Gideon524 was referring to the fire in WTC7. The statement you mention by Chief Palmer was not.

Oh right, I forgot. It WAS a raging inferno, we just couldn't see it.

You call these large fires?

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseacti...ideoID=18947725

People like you would have us believe that these puny little fires sealed the fate of WTC 7 while at the same time, ignoring 2 explosion stories from two WTC 7 survivors and the molten metal found in the basement. Did I mention one of the survivors states that he was stepping over dead bodies to get out of 7? I thought there were no casualties in 7.

:lol:

First, I never claimed it was a "raging inferno", not that my opinion of the fire's severity matters.....I wasn't there. However, the FDNY was there, and they said that the fires in WTC7 were pretty severe.

-Firefighter Steve Modica
Special Operations Command - 20 years

Deputy Chief Nick Visconti
Division 14 - 34 years


When you say that the fires were "puny" or "minor", is this based on your interpretation of the video you posted?


I'd like to discuss the fire intensity questions first, then move on to your other claims. (molten metal, explosions, injuries, etc)

you're right... I misread.