Title: What Made Wing Marks In Shanksville Field?
sukin - December 22, 2007 10:33 PM (GMT)
Something I've always wondered about the Shanksville field. What made though strange wing marks? I always thought they dropped a bomb on the ground and maybe shot some missiles into the forest, however I could never explain what made the wing marks, or "wing marks."
Gideon524 - December 22, 2007 11:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (sukin @ Dec 22 2007, 05:33 PM) |
| Something I've always wondered about the Shanksville field. What made though strange wing marks? I always thought they dropped a bomb on the ground and maybe shot some missiles into the forest, however I could never explain what made the wing marks, or "wing marks." |
Dude, if you look close enough, you can kinda see the imprint of the tail as well.
sukin - December 23, 2007 08:17 AM (GMT)
What???
HVYBASS - December 24, 2007 12:53 AM (GMT)
heres a good web page of a few of the missiles that may have been used that day
http://www.avitop.com/interact/weapons.htm
http://www.avitop.com/interact/weapons.htm
look-up - January 14, 2008 03:38 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Gideon524 @ Dec 22 2007, 11:31 PM) | ||
Dude, if you look close enough, you can kinda see the imprint of the tail as well. |
it can't be wings... look at the deeper portions of the "wing holes", they look deep enough to possibly believe something struck at high speeds, but then when you look at the very thin outer portions of the wing impacts (alleged), then you realize that there's no way a place could have made such fine lines in the dirt, and not harm the dirt only feet away.
Lin Kuei - January 14, 2008 04:46 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (look-up @ Jan 14 2008, 03:38 PM) |
| there's no way a plane could have made such fine lines in the dirt, and not harm the dirt only feet away. |
Yes, and add to that the lines are attached to the road :lol:
whatever it was, it really does look too 'precise' to be from a high velocity impact.
look-up - January 14, 2008 06:56 PM (GMT)
too precise is... pricisely correct!
i wonder if a digger machine could have dug that out in relative stealth...
but here's the thing that keeps confusing me. if 93 was shot down, then how could they have known:
1, that it would be shot down.
2, that it would be shot down in that location (or nearby), having a faked crash site ready in advance?
I think maybe Susan McElwain (sp?) is telling us a story of what she doesn't realize is a plane flying over to drop an ordinance on that scar in the land, knowing that it might look something like a crash site to the ignorant.
What do you all thinK? Was the crash site faked before or after the plane was shot down?
i wonder if a digger machine could have dug that out in relative stealth...
but here's the thing that keeps confusing me. if 93 was shot down, then how could they have known:
1, that it would be shot down.
2, that it would be shot down in that location (or nearby), having a faked crash site ready in advance?
I think maybe Susan McElwain (sp?) is telling us a story of what she doesn't realize is a plane flying over to drop an ordinance on that scar in the land, knowing that it might look something like a crash site to the ignorant.
What do you all thinK? Was the crash site faked before or after the plane was shot down?
2Faced - January 14, 2008 07:35 PM (GMT)
I recently saw a clip that showed the "wing imprints" were there long before 9-11. What's true about that?
look-up - January 14, 2008 09:15 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (2Faced @ Jan 14 2008, 07:35 PM) |
| I recently saw a clip that showed the "wing imprints" were there long before 9-11. What's true about that? |
nothing... they were the wrong imprints. same field, but different imprints.
we are now looking for a photo between 1999 and 9/10/2001 to show us whether the alleged imprints were there before the fact of the attacks.
Has anyone had any luck locating a service to search for good satellite photos?
I have been searching, but nothing thus far.