http://www.randi.org/forumlive/showthread.php?t=101773

*YAWN*

Who's Gravy?

Isn't he that schmuck that said "Nobody ever lied about the air quality."

Yeah, that's the schmuck alright. I thought some of the building demo's on it I hadn't seen before were kind of cool. Now that I've woken up from the nap induced by hanging out Pharaoh's Tavern last night, please feel free to delete it at your leisure.

I feel dirty.

I was being sarcastic. Of course I know who that arrogant fool is. :D

Les Robertson, the man who claims engineers planned/designed for an airline impact but never took into account the fuel. :rolleyes:

I'm goin watch it when I get the chance. Maybe later, has anybody else sat through the whole thing?

Let's just say it's typical.

i thought planes just sort of glided...... :(

I particularly liked the comments on the google link. Should've posted it instead.

Could you point out a method that structural engineers could use to analyze differential thermal strain in a building from the 60's? Or what about post-yield strength of beams?

Thanks.

The shaking camera movie is almost similar as this one

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WH_iBZEHEdE

And what about this one

http://youthfulindiscretions.com/vid/911/E...fter%20Plan.avi

But a few distinct Boom Boom Booms and then an implosion would not be a good choice. That would make even Gravy a questioner..

Either that or a really big sling shot.

Les Roberson saying they planned/designed for an airline impact but never took into account the fuel is easily one of the most pathetic statements I ever heard.

RE : Gravy's new video, if you care.

I don't.

When he first appeared at the old forums, I did... but that interview with Dylan and crew totally turned me off. < sees nothing but loathing hatred for Dylan and crew in Gravy's face >

Perhaps I should've phrased the title a bit differently. Gravy's new video...IF you give a pinch of monkey shit what he says. :)

If I look at the (immediately overloaded) audio track of the video



and crop a part in the beginning I get



if we assume this is due to a row of independent cracks/booms then
we have to compare it with silence, let's mute some parts of it,
that gives



How does that sound ? That sounds like

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=EW0EKKFO (81k only)

IMHO there is no reason to call it a silent collapse,
I assume the genuine FOX5 video already proves
that. 40 seconds, what a horrorshow! but I'm no sound engineer

compare this http://youtube.com/watch?v=leR1EAdls4Y to this http://youtube.com/watch?v=d2QqYfsux48 and this http://www.stage6.com/user/PoliceState/vid...nd-defy-physics?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Yq0iEKmoBIM - shaped charge in snow

I could be mistaken, but it seems that last year any time someone here mentioned Robertson's name, it was to use his statements to support the theory that airliners could not cause the WTC towers to collapse.

Now that he has stated that he was mistaken, why is he not held up as part of the proof of an inside job? How do you decide who to believe here? Why is Robertson less believable now? Was he initially believed merely because his statements appeared to support your views? Or is there another reason? Thanks.

Lark

As much as I hate to create further problems, there's also evidence to support that the FOX5 footage audio has been altered or enhanced. Here is compilation of another partial copy of the same footage and another copy from CNN's 5th anniversary "Remembering 9/11" special: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=CI3X9F4D It's an 18 megabyte wmv. I certainly won't be promoting the audio is authentic anymore, if anything the treble, bass or volume has been increased. I'm no sound engineer either though.

They do. They have these fans, see.... and when they get shot out of the sky, or slam into different types of buildings,they assume any configuration you need! :blink:

Never pleasant to watch someone bend over and insert cranium into rectum. :ph43r: