View Full Version: Interesting Vid About Wtc7 And Wtc1

Loose Change Forum > World Trade Center > Interesting Vid About Wtc7 And Wtc1



Title: Interesting Vid About Wtc7 And Wtc1
Description: watch it


TDX - December 22, 2007 05:55 PM (GMT)

Sureshot - December 22, 2007 05:59 PM (GMT)
Welcome to the forums, thanks for the video, but please post these videos in the correct forum. Thank you.

miragememories - December 22, 2007 06:20 PM (GMT)
Interesting video.

The projected core columns was of particular interest. That visual proof needs further examination.

MM

chris sarns - December 23, 2007 09:45 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (TDX @ Dec 22 2007, 11:55 AM)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=N0RqVtTpIuk :D

Excellent find.

The part about the core columns is new to me.

Good videos have a habit of going away.

Can anybody save of 'back up' this video?

All my video links with Barry in them have been pulled.

Barry is in this one.



MM is right, the core column thing could be huge.

I hope Arie and waterdancer see this.

DoYouEverWonder - December 23, 2007 10:51 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (miragememories @ Dec 22 2007, 01:20 PM)
Interesting video.

The projected core columns was of particular interest. That visual proof needs further examination.

MM

Those were not core colums.

That large piece was a section of the perimeter wall, most likely from the mechanical floors below the top sky lobby. The columns on the mechanical floors were not staggered like they were in the rest of the Towers. They were set at an even height, so that when the piece broke away from the building, it had a straight edge along the bottom.

Just like the ones in the picture below. This proves that the mechanical floors were blown out first, which is what would be expected if you wanted to bring these buildings down.

user posted image


Justicia - December 24, 2007 01:47 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (chris sarns @ Dec 23 2007, 04:45 AM)
All my video links with Barry in them have been pulled.

Wha? All of your video links with Barry in them have been blown up by secretly planted explosives in controlled demolitions?

:D

Oh, and those are not core columns, by the way.

tumetuestumefaisdubien - December 24, 2007 11:40 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (DoYouEverWonder @ Dec 23 2007, 05:51 AM)
Those were not core colums.

That large piece was a section of the perimeter wall, most likely from the mechanical floors below the top sky lobby. The columns on the mechanical floors were not staggered like they were in the rest of the Towers. They were set at an even height, so that when the piece broke away from the building, it had a straight edge along the bottom.

Just like the ones in the picture below. This proves that the mechanical floors were blown out first, which is what would be expected if you wanted to bring these buildings down.

user posted image


No, in the video it is the core remains. For the perimeter they are way too massive, having the column distance mount provingly at least 3 times wider than was in case of perimeter structure (the column distance in chunks, compared to the north face 64m reference, is at least 4 meters, while the distance of the perimeter columns was 1m). Without any doubt what shows the video aren't the chunks of the perimeter.

The chunks of the core, in comparison with the north face size reference, were at least so wide as 6 floors of the North tower (technical floors weren't 6 floors!) and weighted at least several hundreds of tons. No way they would travel so far outside the perimeter in case of a gravitational collapse.
Also the clearly visible squibs during the North tower collapse prove the WTC7 was brought down by the controlled demolition as well.

The chunks are already far from the perimeter limit in the height about ~300 meters! - so it looks like they even were originaly ejected horizontaly or even a bit upwards/outwards. You say that the chunks are the remains of the technical floors, but the 2nd technical floors were in the height ~290 meters (so then the chunks must be ejected upwards/outwards - impossible in a gravitational collapse anyways) and anyway the floor truss even there was much much less massive than what shows the video.
The distance of the beams on the video looks like literally fitting in the proportions of the core mount. Also there were no other so massive structures in the building than the core. So I think it is good assumption the chunks are pieces of the core. (what shows your picture it is the perimeter remains, but what shows the video it is mostly definitely chunks of the core.)
user posted image
What force ejected them?
I think a good asumption is - that it were literally loads of explosives.
That's maybe why the NIST doesn't want to study the "collapse", because they might come to the very same conclusions.
The video, IMHO is also an ultimate orbituary to the "pancake colapse" hypothesis.

Poll thread to the video also here: http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Trut...opic=10291&st=0




Hosted for free by InvisionFree