Niaz Khan, confessed to FBI investigators before 9/11 that he was recruited and trained by Al Qaeda to hijack planes and fly them into buildings...

He passed two FBI polygraph tests and was viewed by FBI agents as being highly credible...

However, the FBI was told by official(s) higher up, to "send him home, and forget about it."

Khan told the FBI everything:

- How he was recruited in London.

- How much money they gave him.

- Specifics regarding his training for hijacking airplanes.

- Places he was taken in Pakistan for training.

- Secret Passwords he was given to use.

- Specifically, that the goal was to fly the hijacked planes into buildings.

About the only thing Khan didn't know concerning the 9/11 plot, was a date and time, something that even Khan's handlers might not have known at the time of his confession.

He was prepared to help expose the entire terrorist infrastructure that recruited him... but the FBI was told to "send him home."


This version of 9/11 Press for Truth discusses Khan at the 34:30 mark:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=39...earch&plindex=0

Heres a related article:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5131524/

Thats wrong. Khan was trained to hijack a plane and fly it to Afghanistan.

Khan told NBC News that for the next few weeks he was trained by al-Qaida to hijack passenger planes, and then sent to the United States.
Congress’ 9/11 report confirms that in April, 2000, an unnamed “walk-in” told the FBI he “was to meet five or six persons” — some of them pilots — who would take over a plane and fly to Afghanistan, or blow the plane up. The report adds that the “walk-in” passed a lie-detector test.

NBC News has learned that Khan passed not one but two FBI polygraphs.

The unnamed person who passed one polygraph of course is Khan.
Moussaoui has confirmed the plan of a 747-hijacking, which should be flown to Afghanistan to press free Sheikh Abdel Rahmen. He EVENTUALLY flies the 747 into the white house:
Link

That report doesn't prove anything "wrong."

We know that Congressional Sponsored Investigations like the 9/11 Commission and others have out-right lied concerning U.S. Army Intelligence pre-9/11 identification of Muhammad Atta and other hijackers before 9/11. Congressional Inquiries have almost no credibility to detail pre-9/11 Intell. (e.g. Able Danger)

Also, Congress' 9/11 Report does not specifically indicate anything about Naiz Khan, merely an "unnamed man." This is conveinent, because they can give us any "story" when discussing the activities of an "unnamed man."

If Khan is the man they are referring to, clearly the 9/11 Report contradicts what FBI investigators told NBC and what has been uncovered by many other sources:

Just a few of these sources include, Naiz Khan himself, NBC, FBI Investigators, and the London Gaurdian.

Khan knew he was being trained for an Al Qaeda-sponsored attack on America:

On 11 September, 2001, Khan was watching television as a plane flew into the World Trade Center. He said: "I could not believe my own eyes. It was like everything I had said, everything I had been told by al-Qaeda. I was in no doubt. Same plan. Perhaps someone from the training camp was on board one of those planes. Perhaps, if I had not run away, I would have been there."

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/waronterror...1232595,00.html

I`m very skeptical about this quote after the attack. Before 9/11 he was talking about a plan to hijack a plane and fly it to Afghanistan. This is not the same plan.
Moussaoui has also mentioned this other plan.

August 2001 PDB:
In one brief mention, sources said, the memo noted that unconfirmed information from British intelligence in 1998 showed that al Qaeda members talked about using an airline hijacking to negotiate the release of imprisoned Muslim cleric Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, who had been convicted of plotting to blow up New York City landmarks.
Washington Post

Do we have any legitimate report confirming that Naiz Khan ever said he was planning on flying a plane to Afghanistan?

Congressional and Bush Administration statements (often filtered to remove damning revelations) have been completely discredited:

Remember, we were told out-right lies concerning the pre-9/11 identification of Muhammed Atta and at least three other hijackers. (e.g. Able Danger)

About every other source, including Naiz Khan himself, NBC, FBI investigaters, and the London Gaurdian have verified the attack was to be on America...

Right.

The only source that attempts to diverge (and only slightly) from Khan's Confession is a source that has already been discredited.

This Confession is a huge story, and way underreported...

I'm still baffled that Khan's confession is unknown by so many people in the 9/11 Truth Movement...