Title: Ron Paul : House Of Cards
Description: ... is coming down
CriticalThinker - November 26, 2007 08:24 AM (GMT)
Wow is this a really SCARY and GOOD video!
http://youtube.com/watch?v=XaxdUPNYj2sHope Chris sarns watches this - Kucinich has NOTHING to offer but U.N. control over the United States. -
chris sarns - November 26, 2007 09:13 AM (GMT)
He's got some spot on positions on the economy and the war.
I agree with most but not all his ideas.
As for the UN.
We live in a global community and a place where we can all come together and talk about our mutual problems is essential.
It will always be somewhat dysfunctional. Reform is a never ending process.
We could demand a precise accounting for every dollar of ours that is spent and provide the accountants to keep the books which should be open to the public at all times.
The fear mongering that we will loose our sovereignty is rubbish.
BTW: your sig is overblown and the "It doesn't take a village ..........
is gross, inappropriate and i have a copy on my wall .... LMAO
Tim Riches - November 26, 2007 09:41 AM (GMT)
Gawd, you yanks are so fucking afraid of the S-word! You have yet to see a true Socialist regime! Not all Fascism looks like Hitler, and all Socialism does not resemble Stalin!
This is your biggest hangup, and one which shows again and again the level of mind control you are suffering under. "We're free! We're free!"
Duck and cover!
There is such a thing as taking the good and chucking the bad! It is done all the time and is also an ongoing process, like reformation.
Like the birds and the bees, there comes a time when many parents tell their kids about another astonishing fact - there are still places in the world that consider themselves advanced where you are quite simply fucked when you are injured or sick.
Roxdog - November 26, 2007 04:54 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
He's got some spot on positions on the economy and the war.
I agree with most but not all his ideas.
As for the UN.
We live in a global community and a place where we can all come together and talk about our mutual problems is essential.
It will always be somewhat dysfunctional. Reform is a never ending process.
We could demand a precise accounting for every dollar of ours that is spent and provide the accountants to keep the books which should be open to the public at all times. |
Ahhhh, it all finally floats to the surface. You're just another lefty Marxist parading as a "truther".
| QUOTE |
| The fear mongering that we will loose our sovereignty is rubbish. |
We have and currently are. Only a lefty Marxist apologist would assert otherwise...
| QUOTE |
| and i have a copy on my wall |
Very fitting.
| QUOTE |
| Gawd, you yanks are so fucking afraid of the S-word! |
For good reason. You Brits are so brainwash by it, its disgusting.
| QUOTE |
| You have yet to see a true Socialist regime! |
But we've seen what happens when idiots try to create one. Stop pretending you know how implement one without killing people.
| QUOTE |
| Not all Fascism looks like Hitler, and all Socialism does not resemble Stalin! |
No, but regardless of how you try to make excuses for it, it still stinks.
Roxdog - November 26, 2007 05:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Like the birds and the bees, there comes a time when many parents tell their kids about another astonishing fact |
See? Could you be ANY MORE elitist?
| QUOTE |
| there are still places in the world that consider themselves advanced where you are quite simply fucked when you are injured or sick. |
And where is that? Please, do tell us. <_<
HereticX - November 26, 2007 05:20 PM (GMT)
Commies get curb checks
Roxdog - November 26, 2007 06:13 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (HereticX @ Nov 26 2007, 11:20 AM) |
Commies get curb checks
|
tossthekitty - November 26, 2007 11:06 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Roxdog @ Nov 26 2007, 12:16 PM) |
| QUOTE | | Like the birds and the bees, there comes a time when many parents tell their kids about another astonishing fact |
See? Could you be ANY MORE elitist?
| QUOTE | | there are still places in the world that consider themselves advanced where you are quite simply fucked when you are injured or sick. |
And where is that? Please, do tell us. <_<
|
Foreign morons ...more brainwashed than right 'chear' in the USA. Unreal!
If we go down THEY GO DOWN! - We (Constitution) are the only thing holding back the NWO from completing HORRIBLE DEEDS TO THE WORLD.
"told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... told ya so ... "
chris sarns - November 27, 2007 12:09 AM (GMT)
Chris Sarns
"We live in a global community and a place where we can all come together and talk about our mutual problems is essential.
The UN will always be somewhat dysfunctional. Reform is a never ending process.
We could demand a precise accounting for every dollar of ours that is spent and provide the accountants to keep the books which should be open to the public at all times."
Roxdog
"Ahhhh, it all finally floats to the surface. You're just another lefty Marxist parading as a "truther". "
Take your "lefty Marxist apologist" and shove it!
Your childish insult toward anyone who disagrees with you on this subject is pathetic.
You have nothing of value to offer on the message, so you attack the messenger.
Ron Paul will "throw the baby out wilt the bathwater" by quiting the UN and NATO.
That's an isolationist policy and it is a bad policy imo.
Chris Sarns
"The fear mongering that we will loose our sovereignty is rubbish."
Roxdog
"We have and currently are. Only a lefty Marxist apologist would assert otherwise..."
Can you site an example of how we are loosing our sovereignty?
alive and still talking - November 27, 2007 12:21 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| Ahhhh, it all finally floats to the surface. You're just another lefty Marxist parading as a "truther". |
COPYCAT. you're stealing my line whenever addressing you, which is
"HOW'S IT FLOAT ?" instead of answering me once, you use my line...
kyou must be pretty desperate for original material.
Roxdog - November 27, 2007 02:37 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (alive and still talking @ Nov 26 2007, 06:21 PM) |
| QUOTE | | Ahhhh, it all finally floats to the surface. You're just another lefty Marxist parading as a "truther". |
COPYCAT. you're stealing my line whenever addressing you, which is
"HOW'S IT FLOAT ?" instead of answering me once, you use my line...
kyou must be pretty desperate for original material. |
Um,what? I have not and never will "copy" you. Run along.
tossthekitty - November 27, 2007 09:22 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chris sarns @ Nov 26 2007, 07:09 PM) |
| We live in a global community |
I'm sorry - I must have missed something here.
I live in a house with my family .... do you live on the streets or something?
Global? - do you let the Chinese in for dinner or what? - I'm confused here.
-Raven- - November 27, 2007 09:50 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (tossthekitty @ Nov 27 2007, 03:22 AM) |
| QUOTE (chris sarns @ Nov 26 2007, 07:09 PM) | | We live in a global community |
I'm sorry - I must have missed something here.
I live in a house with my family .... do you live on the streets or something?
Global? - do you let the Chinese in for dinner or what? - I'm confused here.
|
Just wait until they set their sites on the galaxy. Then, it will be that we live in a universal community, and all of us aliens and humans must learn to live under the same government as well.
That will of course be a communistic universal government that all humans and aliens must adhere to for our own good since "the government" knows what is best for everyone else including all yet to be discovered aliens.
When that happens, I want my own damn spaceship to find another f-ing universe!
:ph43r:
Disclaimer: I don't believe that UFO aliens from another planet are currently visiting Earth. I was just trying to illustrate a point.
EDIT: Anyways, screw the U.N.
Realist - November 27, 2007 05:01 PM (GMT)
I can't believe anyone here would actually defend the U.N.!
If you take this position, please study how and why the UN was started. You may change your mind.
seeker135 - November 27, 2007 10:43 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (chris sarns @ Nov 26 2007, 07:09 PM) |
Chris Sarns "We live in a global community and a place where we can all come together and talk about our mutual problems is essential. The UN will always be somewhat dysfunctional. Reform is a never ending process. We could demand a precise accounting for every dollar of ours that is spent and provide the accountants to keep the books which should be open to the public at all times."
Roxdog "Ahhhh, it all finally floats to the surface. You're just another lefty Marxist parading as a "truther". "
Take your "lefty Marxist apologist" and shove it! Your childish insult toward anyone who disagrees with you on this subject is pathetic. You have nothing of value to offer on the message, so you attack the messenger.
Ron Paul will "throw the baby out wilt the bathwater" by quiting the UN and NATO. That's an isolationist policy and it is a bad policy imo.
Chris Sarns "The fear mongering that we will loose our sovereignty is rubbish." Roxdog "We have and currently are. Only a lefty Marxist apologist would assert otherwise..."
Can you site an example of how we are loosing our sovereignty? |
Google "Codex Alimentarious". Watch video. Report back wiser.
ihatecreditors - November 28, 2007 01:09 AM (GMT)
Nice video with Paul Critical Thinker. Enjoyed it very much!
mynameis - November 28, 2007 01:57 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (ihatecreditors @ Nov 28 2007, 01:09 AM) |
| Nice video with Paul Critical Thinker. Enjoyed it very much! |
As I.
Flipster3013 - November 28, 2007 02:40 AM (GMT)
I think I'm becoming a Ron Paul supporter.
help?
ihatecreditors - November 28, 2007 04:11 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Flipster3013 @ Nov 27 2007, 09:40 PM) |
I think I'm becoming a Ron Paul supporter.
help? |
Oh no! Quickly turn on Fox and CNN.
and don't forget to say your hail marys
tossthekitty - November 28, 2007 07:10 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Flipster3013 @ Nov 27 2007, 09:40 PM) |
I think I'm becoming a Ron Paul supporter.
help? |
Oh God ! NOOOO! .... Spit the pill out - QUICKLY and call Federal Poison Control for instructions ...
Better yet - read Arbor's postings 100 times a day for 10 days or until vomit approaches.
Fulcanelli - November 28, 2007 10:41 AM (GMT)
you people seem like the jews lynching jesus .. as the story goes. seems some of you cant see past the 9/11 issue. so what if he doesnt speak out about what happened on that specific day. what he's saying about dozens of other things are the truth. but i guess that doesnt matter right? if they're not a truther they're not worth shit then eh?
Q-pid Stunt - November 28, 2007 11:52 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Tim Riches @ Nov 26 2007, 07:41 PM) |
Gawd, you yanks are so fucking afraid of the S-word! You have yet to see a true Socialist regime! Not all Fascism looks like Hitler, and all Socialism does not resemble Stalin!
This is your biggest hangup, and one which shows again and again the level of mind control you are suffering under. "We're free! We're free!"
Duck and cover!
There is such a thing as taking the good and chucking the bad! It is done all the time and is also an ongoing process, like reformation.
Like the birds and the bees, there comes a time when many parents tell their kids about another astonishing fact - there are still places in the world that consider themselves advanced where you are quite simply fucked when you are injured or sick. |
I don't see Socialism as being paritcularly active in the u.s.
Admittedly there are a few Socialist "fronts" like alleged health care to present an image of caring about the people, but the government itself is fascist/capitalistic. If there's a way of making a quick buck, stealing five cents from a blind man is perfectly acceptable.
Tim Riches - November 28, 2007 12:34 PM (GMT)
I agree with Fulcanelli. If Ron Paul openly declares there will be no new investigation, you would still be absolute fools not to elect him!
The only negative about Ron Paul's positions to me is that they sound good, but will hurt worse than you can imagine to implement. Changing to a gold standard and abolishing the FED alone will come close to killing the patient.
Sadly, I don't think Paul has a hope in hell of being picked to run. If they somehow, impossibly pick him, he will die before he is elected. If he is elected, he will certainly be the next President to be assassinated. His policies are anathema to those who run the World and he will be in constant danger from his own security people!
He has the biggest balls on the planet, given that he certainly knows this and yet continues. At the very least he is altering the consciousness and changing the debate across the board, so even if he doesn't win he will have performed a valuable service to America.
As to the comments of those outside your glass house, America, deal with it. We have as much, as you eloquently point out ad nauseum, to lose in this next election as you do. Maybe more since the rocks are turning into a rain these days.
Roxdog - November 28, 2007 04:25 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Q-pid Stunt @ Nov 28 2007, 05:52 AM) |
I don't see Socialism as being paritcularly active in the u.s.
|
YOu are joking, right?
alive and still talking - November 28, 2007 04:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| YOu are joking, right? |
YOU of all people should know...
Flipster3013 - November 28, 2007 10:51 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Fulcanelli @ Nov 28 2007, 05:41 AM) |
| you people seem like the jews lynching jesus .. as the story goes. seems some of you cant see past the 9/11 issue. so what if he doesnt speak out about what happened on that specific day. what he's saying about dozens of other things are the truth. but i guess that doesnt matter right? if they're not a truther they're not worth shit then eh? |
What he said was that he doesn't know much about the issue but that aligned with Kucinich they could get bi-partisan support for a new investigation. He does not say he is AGAINST a new investigation. At least in the interview I'm mentioning.
(source:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=d91a13Yr3oQ )
This is one of the reasons I think I may have started to change my position.
However, as said. He'll never be picked to run for the party. We all know historically what happens to candidates that run as independents. The media picks the winner.
Q-pid Stunt - November 29, 2007 08:28 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Roxdog @ Nov 29 2007, 02:25 AM) |
| QUOTE (Q-pid Stunt @ Nov 28 2007, 05:52 AM) | I don't see Socialism as being paritcularly active in the u.s.
|
YOu are joking, right?
|
I'm serious. I see plenty of people participating at street level in socialist activities, but like most governments, I see no genuine Leftist activity in the u.s government. Whilstever money buys votes, I don't see any politician being there for the benefit of the people he "represents".
Tenacious E - November 29, 2007 08:42 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Q-pid Stunt @ Nov 29 2007, 08:28 AM) |
| QUOTE (Roxdog @ Nov 29 2007, 02:25 AM) | | QUOTE (Q-pid Stunt @ Nov 28 2007, 05:52 AM) | I don't see Socialism as being paritcularly active in the u.s.
|
YOu are joking, right?
|
I'm serious. I see plenty of people participating at street level in socialist activities, but like most governments, I see no genuine Leftist activity in the u.s government. Whilstever money buys votes, I don't see any politician being there for the benefit of the people he "represents".
|
dude...dont bother... you're talking to ROXDOG! this guy doesn't his ass from a hole in the ground, let alone any political theory, frameworks, or facts for that matter.
the US is by far the least socialist nation in the entire developed world. the fed, NSA, DEA, IRS, etc... have NOTHING to do with socialism. these are tools of oppression, not socialism
Roxdog - November 29, 2007 04:18 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| dude...dont bother... you're talking to ROXDOG! this guy doesn't his ass from a hole in the ground, let alone any political theory, frameworks, or facts for that matter. |
BWahhaha....another joke. I can say for sure I am far more educated AND adept at discussing these matters than you will ever be. You are the one spouting false-choice talking points from your chosen home team, not me.
| QUOTE |
| the US is by far the least socialist nation in the entire developed world. the fed, NSA, DEA, IRS, etc... have NOTHING to do with socialism. these are tools of oppression, not socialism |
Socialism is the DRIVING FORCE of oppression, you twit. Get a goddamn clue...I could sit here and write a book listing the practices and goals of the US federal government that DEFINE socialism.
chris sarns - November 30, 2007 09:28 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (seeker135 @ Nov 27 2007, 04:43 PM) |
| QUOTE (chris sarns @ Nov 26 2007, 07:09 PM) | Chris Sarns "We live in a global community and a place where we can all come together and talk about our mutual problems is essential. The UN will always be somewhat dysfunctional. Reform is a never ending process. We could demand a precise accounting for every dollar of ours that is spent and provide the accountants to keep the books which should be open to the public at all times."
Roxdog "Ahhhh, it all finally floats to the surface. You're just another lefty Marxist parading as a "truther". "
Take your "lefty Marxist apologist" and shove it! Your childish insult toward anyone who disagrees with you on this subject is pathetic. You have nothing of value to offer on the message, so you attack the messenger.
Ron Paul will "throw the baby out wilt the bathwater" by quiting the UN and NATO. That's an isolationist policy and it is a bad policy imo.
Chris Sarns "The fear mongering that we will loose our sovereignty is rubbish." Roxdog "We have and currently are. Only a lefty Marxist apologist would assert otherwise..."
Can you site an example of how we are loosing our sovereignty? |
Google "Codex Alimentarious". Watch video. Report back wiser.
|
A friend gave me this URL just last week.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5266884912495233634The problem is CODEX not the UN.
CODEX = bathwater
UN = baby
Roxdog - November 30, 2007 04:30 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
The problem is CODEX not the UN.
CODEX = bathwater
UN = baby |
The UN is very much part of the problem, Chris. Its very hard to take you seriously when you stick up for gun grabbers and an organization that is responsible for untold horrors upon humanity. You know NOTHING about the UNs origins do you? You have a lot of homework to do...
UN "peacekeepers" torture a Somali child over fire | QUOTE |
First published in the United States on the cover of the June 24th issue of the left-wing weekly Village Voice, the photograph depicts two Belgian paladins of the new world order giddily holding a Somali child over an open flame. Other series of photographs depict UN soldiers kicking and stabbing a Somali, and another soldier apparently urinating on the Somali’s dead body; yet another shows a Somali child being forced to drink salt water, vomit, and worms. A second group of photos published in the July 15th Village Voice shows the dead bodies of bound Somalis — what appears to be the work of a death squad. One atrocity not caught on camera involved the "punishment" of a Somali child by placing him in a metal container and withholding water from him for two days; predictably, the relentless African heat killed the child. One Belgian UN soldier testified that it was a regular practice to use metal boxes as prison cells, and that other Somalis probably died similarly gruesome deaths.
Strangely Silent
One might expect the photographs and first-person accounts of such atrocities to arouse public indignation against the UN’s "planetary police," just as the endlessly replayed videotape of the Rodney King arrest turned public opinion against the Los Angeles Police Department. Perhaps this is why the photographs have been all but invisible in the United States, and precious little media attention has been devoted to an examination of UN atrocities.
Village Voice reporter Jennifer Gould came across the accounts of the Belgian atrocities while doing an earlier story about sexual harassment of female employees at UN headquarters. "When I spoke with people at the UN, time after time I was told, ‘If you think it’s bad here, you ought to see what happens in peacekeeping operations,’" Gould told The New American. "I started looking into that issue and found that the abuses I reported were well-known and easily documented. They were all over the media abroad, and I was really surprised it hadn’t been written about over here."
Belgian military authorities launched an investigation into the atrocities following publication of a front-page story by Belgium’s Het Laatste Nieuws. In early July, Privates Claude Baert and Kurt Coelus, the two paratroopers photographed dangling the Somali child over a flame, were acquitted by a military court, which ruled that the incident — described by Baert and Coelus as a punishment for stealing — was "a form of playing without violence," according to prosecutor Luc Walleyn. And what of discipline from the UN, whose "Code of Personal Conduct for Blue Helmets" requires that peacekeepers "respect and regard the human rights of all"? Gould reports that a UN spokesman dismissed the acquittal of Baert and Coelus by insisting that "the UN is not in the habit of embarrassing governments that contribute peacekeeping troops."
For its diligence in reporting unwelcome news, Het Laatste Nieuws was rewarded with a bomb threat. Reporter Lieve Van Bastelaere informed The New American that the man arrested for making the threat owned a local bar that is frequented by many people in the military, including veterans of "peacekeeping" missions. "He apparently had been angered by what he had read," Bastelaere observed dryly. "We’ve enhanced our security here at the paper, and the police took the threat seriously, even though he may have been drunk when he made it. He claimed not to remember phoning in the threat when he was arrested."
In September, another military tribunal will be held to investigate the actions of Sergeant Dirk Nassel, the soldier photographed forcing a Somali boy to ingest worms and vomit. However, the Belgian military system — which is deeply entwined with the UN "peacekeeping" apparatus — has yet to inflict substantive penalties for abuses committed in the service of the UN. Several years ago, according to Gould, "Belgian soldiers were also accused of holding mock executions for Somali children and forcing them to dig their own graves; though their officer was given a suspended sentence, the soldiers were acquitted." It is thus firmly established in Belgian military jurisprudence that service in the new world army is a license to commit barbarities with impunity. |
| QUOTE |
Follow the Brothels
The market in prostitution — including child prostitution — thrives wherever blue berets decamp. According to Gould, records of UN peacekeeping missions document that "brothels have sprouted nearby — and in one case allegedly inside — UN compounds. In the latter case, prostitutes were allegedly employed by the UN and were reportedly even shipped on UN planes to fornicate with a UN staff member in hotels paid for by the UN."
Last December a UN study on children in war reported that blue berets had been involved in child prostitution in six of the 12 countries which had been studied. In country after country unfortunate enough to attract the UN’s "humanitarian" intervention, "the arrival of peacekeeping troops has been accompanied with a rapid rise in child prostitution," the document reported. Following the signing of a peace treaty in Mozambique in 1992, for example, "soldiers of the United Nations operation … recruited girls aged 12 to 18 years into prostitution."
However, as Jennifer Gould learned, the mistreatment of women is something of a UN tradition — the world body’s enthusiastic support for radical feminism notwithstanding. In a report published in the May 20th Village Voice, Gould described the plight of Catherine Claxon, a UN employee who filed the first-ever sexual harassment complaint against the UN in 1991. After Claxon filed her complaint, "Someone fired a shot through the glass window of a coffee shop by the United Nations" — just above Claxon’s head. "Another bullet shattered Claxon’s windshield as she drove home from her job at the UN one night on the Long Island Expressway." On three other occasions, Claxon was nearly run off the road — at the same spot where she was nearly killed by the gunshot. According to Gould, "UN women describe a godfather-like institution" — a network of cronyism and corruption. "This is compounded by the fact that in some UN member countries, women are treated as chattel instead of as equals." |
mynameis - November 30, 2007 04:43 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Tenacious E @ Nov 29 2007, 08:42 AM) |
| dude...dont bother... you're talking to ROXDOG! this guy doesn't his ass from a hole in the ground, let alone any political theory, frameworks, or facts for that matter. |
:blink:
Roxdog - November 30, 2007 04:47 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (mynameis @ Nov 30 2007, 10:43 AM) |
| QUOTE (Tenacious E @ Nov 29 2007, 08:42 AM) | | dude...dont bother... you're talking to ROXDOG! this guy doesn't his ass from a hole in the ground, let alone any political theory, frameworks, or facts for that matter. |
:blink:
|
Hilarious isn't it? I guess he wants to say all that about me before everyone realizes it about him. :lol:
Everything Tenacious says is a psychology lesson in delusional thinking.
Tenacious E - November 30, 2007 04:50 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Roxdog @ Nov 29 2007, 04:18 PM) |
| QUOTE | | dude...dont bother... you're talking to ROXDOG! this guy doesn't his ass from a hole in the ground, let alone any political theory, frameworks, or facts for that matter. |
BWahhaha....another joke. I can say for sure I am far more educated AND adept at discussing these matters than you will ever be. You are the one spouting false-choice talking points from your chosen home team, not me.
| QUOTE | | the US is by far the least socialist nation in the entire developed world. the fed, NSA, DEA, IRS, etc... have NOTHING to do with socialism. these are tools of oppression, not socialism |
Socialism is the DRIVING FORCE of oppression, you twit. Get a goddamn clue...I could sit here and write a book listing the practices and goals of the US federal government that DEFINE socialism.
|
and where do you get your definition of socialism? roxdog's yahoo webpage? try a dictionary, or maybe political theory textbooks or literature. none of THEM agree with you, so where the fuck do get your bullshit from? fox news?
and while you're at it, why don't you indulge us with your qualifications to speak on ANYTHING political?
Roxdog - November 30, 2007 04:54 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| and where do you get your definition of socialism? |
I get it from a dictionary. It is YOU that twists definitions to suit your twisted marxist world-view.
| QUOTE |
| roxdog's yahoo webpage? |
No, unlike you, I went to college and got an education.
| QUOTE |
| try a dictionary, or maybe political theory textbooks or literature. |
I own all my poli sci textbooks from school. You don't know sh^t about anything written in any of the them. You are a hack at best.
| QUOTE |
| none of THEM agree with you, |
Actually, the old ones do, and many of the new ones. But you wouldn't know anything about that.
| QUOTE |
| so where the fuck do get your bullshit from? fox news? |
Evoking a phony paradigm and trying to pigeon hole me into it only shows how utterly clueless you are. FOX pimps Hillary. FOX pimps socialism. Just like you.
You are aiding the neoconservative movement. :)
Roxdog - November 30, 2007 04:58 PM (GMT)
Here, pick one you retard...let us know which one you like best...now that you are fully out of the closet as a proponent of Marxism. :)
| QUOTE |
Definitions of SOCIALISM on the Web:
The core idea of socialism, in its democratic form, is that the working classes; that is, the majority, should form an extensive system of ... www.eubios.info/biodict.htm
An "economic, social and political doctrine which expresses the struggle for the equal distribution of wealth by eliminating private property and the exploitative ruling class. ... www2.truman.edu/~marc/resources/terms.html
An economic system in which the basic means of production are primarily owned and controlled collectively, usually by government under some system of central planning. countrystudies.us/united-states/economy-12.htm
adherence to the theory social organization which believes the proprietorship and the authority of the means of production, capital, land, etc. should belong to the entire community. The Socialist Party in London's day was considered a respectable alternate political party. ... london.sonoma.edu/Essays/glossary.html
A system based on public ownership of the means of production and distribution of wealth. www.bl.uk/learning/histcitizen/voices/ref/gloss/glossary.html
The view that the government should own and control major industries www.mcwdn.org/ECONOMICS/EcoGlossary.html
An economic and political system in which private property is abolished and the means of production (ie, capital and land) are collectively owned and operated by the community as a whole in order to advance the interests of all. ... www.indiana.edu/~ipe/glossry.html
According to Joseph Schumpeter, socialism is the public ownership of the means of production and distribution; but in American parlance it is often used pejoratively to describe any attempt at governmental regulation or intervention. ... www.politicalscience.utoledo.edu/faculty/lindeen/glos3260.htm
a political or economic theory in which community members own all property, resources, and the means of production, and control the distribution of goods. www.teach-nology.com/worksheets/soc_studies/industry/vocab/
a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. www.markville.ss.yrdsb.edu.on.ca/politics/exemplars/meg2.html
a political theory advocating state ownership of industry an economic system based on state ownership of capital wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
Socialism refers to a broad array of doctrines or political movements that envisage a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the community. ... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism
is any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy." www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/teach/red/back2.html |
Roxdog - November 30, 2007 05:02 PM (GMT)
Tenacious E - November 30, 2007 05:04 PM (GMT)
HAHAHAHAHAHAH thanks for showing everyone how dumb you are. NONE of those say or imply "oppression". very nice picture btw. cuz we all know that imporatnt figures from nations never meet each other except for nefarious purposes.
Roxdog - November 30, 2007 05:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE |
| HAHAHAHAHAHAH thanks for showing everyone how dumb you are. |
The only thing that is funny is that most of the people reading this are thinking the opposite.
| QUOTE |
| NONE of those say or imply "oppression". |
Actually they very much do. These define a power monopoly of the state where the elite running the govt get to decide what to do with and how to distribute all the wealth and resources. This has been the driving force of tyranny for all of written history. Parroting things you've heard on Air America doesn't change history. :)
| QUOTE |
| very nice picture btw. cuz we all know that important figures from nations never meet each other except for nefarious purposes. |
This is a fundraiser for Hillary.....you ignorant twat. :lol:
look-up - November 30, 2007 05:34 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (-Raven- @ Nov 27 2007, 09:50 AM) |
| QUOTE (tossthekitty @ Nov 27 2007, 03:22 AM) | | QUOTE (chris sarns @ Nov 26 2007, 07:09 PM) | | We live in a global community |
I'm sorry - I must have missed something here.
I live in a house with my family .... do you live on the streets or something?
Global? - do you let the Chinese in for dinner or what? - I'm confused here.
|
Just wait until they set their sites on the galaxy. Then, it will be that we live in a universal community, and all of us aliens and humans must learn to live under the same government as well.
That will of course be a communistic universal government that all humans and aliens must adhere to for our own good since "the government" knows what is best for everyone else including all yet to be discovered aliens.
When that happens, I want my own damn spaceship to find another f-ing universe!
:ph43r:
Disclaimer: I don't believe that UFO aliens from another planet are currently visiting Earth. I was just trying to illustrate a point.
EDIT: Anyways, screw the U.N.
|
there is another option available, if people will take it.
Peace.
The real variety, not the faked type that nations of earth have proposed for centuries. And it's not communism either. We just need more cooperation from other nations. We should use diplomats and think tanks that are open about their dealings, and allow them to make peace with other nations.
Some may say that diplomacy is corrupt. Well it certainly has that history, yes. But if we are true about our intentions and we truly do not wish harm on the other nation, and do not make threats (this is a good argument for abolishing CIA) then we will have a worthy and sincere foundation on which peace must be built if it is going to last.
We should have a military to use for defense, and defense ONLY.
Now, if one day we are made aware of alien visitors and a larger interstellar community, I believe there is hope that humanity could either have learned how to create peace on earth, or be right at that moment when peace is desirable to enough people that the effect would be extending that ideal towards the new species.
THAT WOULD NOT NEED TO BE AN ALL INCLUSIVE GOVERNMENT. Don't misquote me here folks. Of course, if there was an already large enough all inclusive government that was tyrannical, then it could certainly force us under its jurisdiction. However I don't thnk that to be the way things usually work out there. If there was such a race, it would surely have wiped us out by now. The mere fact that humans DO NOT have alien DNA infused into their own, is proof that any potential galactic neighbors, if there are any, probably value our diversity and would not wish to harm us. They may even be waiting for us to prove they exist before they make publicly disclosed contact with our species.
Most alien races probably would not want to engulf our society and "assimiliate" it, so to speak, so we could even have multiple nations from earth representing humanity among other worlds. We wouldn't have to necessarily all speak as one "HUMAN" voice all of the time, although on occasion we may all choose to.
There is no need for massive globalization of governmemt or the errosion of political boundries & national soveriegnty. We just need to learn how to be good neighbors to each other. If a nation tries to take over the world like nazis did, then we stop them. If there is massive genocide happening in another part of the world, we oppose it and take measures to stop it, as chosen by the people.
Peace has always been possible. The problem is that people have been defining it incorrectly, partially with mal-intent, for all of history, so that peace would not happen. But we are becoming much wiser as a people, and I believe we are ready for the next great step towards peace -- the lasting kind. And not the kind enforced by a massive police-state. But the kind that is voluntarily kept by all of the world's nations, because they know that their continued existence as a nation would depend on not attacking others.
History shows that when the people are in charge of a nation's direction, that peace is more likely. The problem now is that the people aren't in control in most places in the world. Democracy is actually a minority.
How do you demacraticize the planet? You practice it flawlessly! You show the rest of the world what freedom is really about, and you use diplomats to secure peace with other nations in good faith. Terrorist cells will not attack those which do not appear to be threatening, and the people of other nations will overthrow their governments according to their own will and without our funding and puppeteering.
As Ron Paul says, "We should mind our business." Or rather, we should change our definition of business so that it does not involve shaping other nations with U.S. working class labor.
If the United States can lead by example, others would be sure to follow. I think this was the hope of our founding fathers actually. That we would shine as a beacon to other souls longing for a sanctuary of freedom. What we have done with that gift is treason. No less.