View Full Version: Jeremy Glick's Phone Call At 9:37:41

Loose Change Forum > Flight 93 > Jeremy Glick's Phone Call At 9:37:41


Title: Jeremy Glick's Phone Call At 9:37:41
Description: Lasts until 11:43:49am


Terrorcell - November 8, 2007 03:09 AM (GMT)
Moussaoui Trial Evidence

:blink: :blink: :blink:

Zaphod 36 - November 9, 2007 10:06 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
Jeremy Glick's Phone Call At 9:37:41, Lasts 12.5 Hours

My computational result for Glicks call is 126 Minutes (7565s/60s = 126,08min.).
The line left open until 11:43:49am. The official crash time is 10:03am
This is a hard proof that Flight 93 was NOT crashing in Shanksville.

Makely, Glicks father-in-law, took the phone from Liz when the fight has began.
Jere Longman(Page371):
"At the operator`s request, Makely remained on the line for ninety minutes. He thought he heard the sound of a phone banging against something."

Perhaps the phone was hang up at 11:43am, when Flight 93 was cleared in Cleveland.

Terrorcell - November 9, 2007 05:54 PM (GMT)
that's what happens when I do math late at night.... :P

Either way these phone calls are an impossibility and prove that these 2 passengers could not have been on the plane that was shot down in PA.

Zaphod 36 - November 9, 2007 11:56 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Either way these phone calls are an impossibility and prove that these 2 passengers could not have been on the plane that was shot down in PA.

Whats your proof or indication that Flight 93 was shot down in PA? Could it be that another plane was shot down there, if the shot-down actually had happened?

If the phone calls of Glick and Beamer were faked, why should the perpetrators left the phone line open so long?

Terrorcell - November 10, 2007 01:33 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Zaphod 36 @ Nov 9 2007, 11:56 PM)
QUOTE
Either way these phone calls are an impossibility and prove that these 2 passengers could not have been on the plane that was shot down in PA.

1) Whats your proof or indication that Flight 93 was shot down in PA? Could it be that another plane was shot down there, if the shot-down actually had happened?

2) If the phone calls of Glick and Beamer were faked, why should the perpetrators left the phone line open so long?

1) It definitely was a plane other than United Airlines Flight 93. Lee Purbaugh says the plane was a dark grey almost blackish color and was flying right side up as it plummeted into ground. I have not seen to date anything that positively identifies this plane as United Airlines 93. The remains are locked a mile underground deep inside Iron Mountain and there wasn't remains recovered for all passengers more like the 12-15 Miller identified and the rest is propaganda. The small hole would indicate that something much smaller than a 757 crashed there. Since I have no definitive proof any debris such as engines were planted then I accept that to be true and the phone call from Felt and the fact the engines were seperated and had so much distance between them. 3 Crash sites and all 3 treated like legitimate crash sites. Indian Lake & New Baltimore scenes were treated the same as Shanksville the public just never got to see them. Closed off and FBI temp sites for people to bring or report debris at.

2) I haven't concluded them to be fakes only from seperate planes. The fact that the connection was never broken despite being either smashed all over the earth or buried 50 feet into the ground it's safe to conclude that those phones definitely weren't on the plane that crashed in Shanksville. This is in all actuality a huge smoking gun.





Hosted for free by InvisionFree