View Full Version: Ron Paul Does Not Support The Truth Movement

Loose Change Forum > 9/11 Truth and Loose Change in the media > Ron Paul Does Not Support The Truth Movement



Title: Ron Paul Does Not Support The Truth Movement
Description: He is just another fucking bullshitter


Spengler - October 11, 2007 02:16 AM (GMT)
To all of you Ron Paul sympathizers,
After listening this clip interview, I hope that you have no more doubts that the son of a bitch and fucking bullshitter of Ron Paul is just another piece of shit of politician trying to use the truth movement as a mean of spreading his political agenda.
This also proves that the fucking prick of Alex Jones is profiting from the pain of the people who lost relatives on 9/11.

Here the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfdq6hoe-XY


livefreeordietryin - October 11, 2007 08:27 AM (GMT)
Ron Paul is not an idiot... Evidently the same cannot be said for you.

The people on this forum are quite intelligent, don't make them spell it out for you, do the math. Use that wonderful thing we call a brain, I'm sure you'll figure it out.

STEALTH - October 11, 2007 10:49 AM (GMT)
Ron Paul disagrees that it was the US government that orchestrated the attacks.

Sam Handwich - October 11, 2007 12:43 PM (GMT)
Regardless of what Ron Paul or any other candidate truly thinks about 911, they can't say it out loud if they wish to remain politically viable and not be given the "Rosie treatment" by the MSM.

Even if there were to be a new 911 investigation under a theoretical President Ron Paul, why would we expect the outcome to be any different? Maybe they'd erase some question marks, ignore many others and create a few more in the process, but do you really think a government commission would present a coherent, comprehensive report, much less one that would implicate their own institution?

The grass roots movement pushing along Ron Paul's campaign is largely the result of his views on foreign policy, taxation, international trade and fiscal responsibility.


System Of A Down - October 11, 2007 02:45 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (livefreeordietryin @ Oct 11 2007, 03:27 AM)
Ron Paul is not an idiot... Evidently the same cannot be said for you.

The people on this forum are quite intelligent, don't make them spell it out for you, do the math. Use that wonderful thing we call a brain, I'm sure you'll figure it out.

B)

Roxdog - October 11, 2007 03:01 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Spengler @ Oct 11 2007, 02:16 AM)
To all of you Ron Paul sympathizers,
After listening this clip interview, I hope that you have no more doubts that the son of a bitch and fucking bullshitter of Ron Paul is just another piece of shit of politician trying to use the truth movement as a mean of spreading his political agenda.
This also proves that the fucking prick of Alex Jones is profiting from the pain of the people who lost relatives on 9/11.

Here the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfdq6hoe-XY

You are an imbecile. These people have done more than you will ever do in your life to further the cause of liberty. You sit on your @ss and wait for a hero to save you. Get a f^cking life. :)

illuminate - October 13, 2007 11:54 AM (GMT)
QUOTE
ou are an imbecile. These people have done more than you will ever do in your life to further the cause of liberty. You sit on your @ss and wait for a hero to save you. Get a f^cking life.
I have to applaud Alex "Sucker Born Every Minute" Jones for making so much money off so many morons.

Keep licking his fat ass and watch out for those bone shattering mega attacks!

operator kos - October 13, 2007 05:08 PM (GMT)
Ron Paul has said no gov. involvement and Dennis Kucinich's promised 9/11 investigation has been "put on hold indefinitely". Mike Gravel has said "hell no we don't know the truth about 9/11," but he has even less support than the first two.

BOTTOM LINE: We can't rely on politicians to carry our fight for us! It's up to We The People!

System Of A Down - October 14, 2007 07:16 PM (GMT)
ron paul is the only anti NWO cand.


BOTTOM LINE


gravel is pro nwo world gov

kuchichchcblahblah wants to steal our guns

alive and still talking - October 14, 2007 08:58 PM (GMT)
gravel is not a viable candidate, therefore not worthy of mention. although he has a few things to say that are worth listening to, he only serves to make this race look like a circus

operator kos - October 15, 2007 06:08 AM (GMT)
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a RP-basher. Heck, I've even contributed money to him. There are some things I like and dislike about all three candidates I mentioned. I'm just personally not going to spend any more time supporting any candidate. I'm not dissing anyone who wants to do that either, but I'd rather be making 9/11 Truth fliers and passing them out in the street.

hamba - October 15, 2007 09:54 AM (GMT)
What makes you certain that Ron Paul is not pro-NWO and the other candidates are?

Would be interesting to read about this.

Roxdog - October 15, 2007 02:12 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (illuminate @ Oct 13 2007, 11:54 AM)
I have to applaud Alex "Sucker Born Every Minute" Jones for making so much money off so many morons.

Keep licking his fat ass and watch out for those bone shattering mega attacks!

Another do-nothing imbecile spouting a bunch of sh^t from his mother's basement...

Got a source an Alex's income? :)

QUOTE
What makes you certain that Ron Paul is not pro-NWO and the other candidates are?

Um, facts. :lol:

hamba - October 16, 2007 05:44 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Roxdog @ Oct 15 2007, 09:12 AM)
Um, facts. :lol:

Facts? what facts? Where are these facts?

Got any links? HUH?

Typical!!

hopeforall - October 16, 2007 10:19 AM (GMT)
I know it mat be hard to believe for some of you, but Ron Paul actually doesnt believe 9/11 was an inside job. He isnt trying to cover his opinions in fear of losing in the race or anything like that, he truely doesnt believe it. He believes in major intelligence malfunctions on that day!

Does this means hes a piece of shit and doesnt deserve our support as the best possible candidate? NO!!!!

What other options do we have if not Ron Paul???


Reggie_perrin - October 16, 2007 11:56 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (hopeforall @ Oct 16 2007, 10:19 AM)
I know it mat be hard to believe for some of you, but Ron Paul actually doesnt believe 9/11 was an inside job. He isnt trying to cover his opinions in fear of losing in the race or anything like that, he truely doesnt believe it. He believes in major intelligence malfunctions on that day!

Does this means hes a piece of shit and doesnt deserve our support as the best possible candidate? NO!!!!

What other options do we have if not Ron Paul???

Agree, he DEFINATLY doesn't think the US government orchastrated 9/11, people who say he's just covering that up while he is running are wrong, ..he is a staunch beliver that 9/11 was blowback from years of US foreign policy towards themiddle east , that said i have heard him say he would support a new enquiry due to the fact that nobody was actually held accountable for the incompetance, that alone should be enough for truthers to get behind him.

ron1872 - October 18, 2007 07:30 PM (GMT)
He wants to get the troops out of Iraq and that sounds positive and a good starting point!

illuminate - October 21, 2007 07:06 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Another do-nothing imbecile spouting a bunch of sh^t from his mother's basement...
Stop projecting Roxdog. You don't need to be embarassed that you live at home and spend your spare time (of which you apparently have a lot) promoting conspiracy theories on the internet.

And the constant stream of abuse? Don't worry, most people assume that means you have a vibrant social life and no personal "issues" to work out.
QUOTE
Got a source an Alex's income?
Yeah, dumbasses.

darion - October 21, 2007 07:17 PM (GMT)
Wtf happened to you illuminate? I know you used to be a Sceptic but you where never this abusive before. I even respected your comments. This has to be someone with his account becasue I cannot beleave hes spitting this kind of venom out like this. The illuminate I used to know never would have lowered his words to this level.

illuminate - October 21, 2007 08:51 PM (GMT)
Its just a special treat for Roxdog. The little tyke needs some of his own medicine.

GermaniumGeorge - October 22, 2007 04:32 AM (GMT)

hopeforall - October 22, 2007 08:26 AM (GMT)
RoxDog seems moronic soo i try to stay away from engaging him in conversation. I think it would be best if more did sooo!!!!

Roxdog - October 22, 2007 01:04 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (illuminate @ Oct 21 2007, 07:06 PM)
QUOTE
Another do-nothing imbecile spouting a bunch of sh^t from his mother's basement...
Stop projecting Roxdog. You don't need to be embarassed that you live at home and spend your spare time (of which you apparently have a lot) promoting conspiracy theories on the internet.

And the constant stream of abuse? Don't worry, most people assume that means you have a vibrant social life and no personal "issues" to work out.
QUOTE
Got a source an Alex's income?
Yeah, dumbasses.

BWahhaa...that was just stupid. :lol:

Roxdog - October 22, 2007 01:07 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (hopeforall @ Oct 22 2007, 08:26 AM)
RoxDog seems moronic soo i try to stay away from engaging him in conversation. I think it would be best if more did sooo!!!!

No, I attack what is moronic. You've got it backwards. <_<

ross11988 - October 22, 2007 02:15 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (GermaniumGeorge @ Oct 22 2007, 04:32 AM)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d91a13Yr3oQ...related&search=

You guys really need to wake up. He has said he would re open the 9/11 investigation, by mixing 9/11 Truth and Ron Paul it just hurts his chances of winning. Who would you rather have? Hilliary or Guliani?

KewlDudeRules - October 22, 2007 03:26 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Spengler @ Oct 10 2007, 09:16 PM)
To all of you Ron Paul sympathizers,
After listening this clip interview, I hope that you have no more doubts that the son of a bitch and fucking bullshitter of Ron Paul is just another piece of shit of politician trying to use the truth movement as a mean of spreading his political agenda.
This also proves that the fucking prick of Alex Jones is profiting from the pain of the people who lost relatives on 9/11.

Here the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfdq6hoe-XY

Very inaccurate!

Although Dr. Paul may not agree with 9/11 truth, he nevertheless, supports a new 9/11 Commission. I am in agreement as most of us are in this site.

He is our best bet. Would you rather have the other candidates?

As for the NWO, he is not part of it that is why they are afraid of his support and are trying everything in their power to derail him. It is not working. People know.


Galileo - October 22, 2007 09:29 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (KewlDudeRules @ Oct 22 2007, 10:26 AM)
QUOTE (Spengler @ Oct 10 2007, 09:16 PM)
To all of you Ron Paul sympathizers,
After listening this clip interview, I hope that you have no more doubts that the son of a bitch and fucking bullshitter of Ron Paul is just another piece of shit of politician trying to use the truth movement as a mean of spreading his political agenda.
This also proves that the fucking prick of Alex Jones is profiting from the pain of the people who lost relatives on 9/11.

Here the link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfdq6hoe-XY

Very inaccurate!

Although Dr. Paul may not agree with 9/11 truth, he nevertheless, supports a new 9/11 Commission. I am in agreement as most of us are in this site.

He is our best bet. Would you rather have the other candidates?

As for the NWO, he is not part of it that is why they are afraid of his support and are trying everything in their power to derail him. It is not working. People know.


If Ron Paul ere elected, you can expect immediate leaks of secret documents that will immediately explose who did 9/11.

IF Hillary gets in, we'll need a new investigation, don't expect it.

hopeforall - October 23, 2007 09:52 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (ross11988 @ Oct 22 2007, 09:15 AM)
QUOTE (GermaniumGeorge @ Oct 22 2007, 04:32 AM)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d91a13Yr3oQ...related&search=

You guys really need to wake up. He has said he would re open the 9/11 investigation, by mixing 9/11 Truth and Ron Paul it just hurts his chances of winning. Who would you rather have? Hilliary or Guliani?

because he would Reopen the case doesnt mean he believes it was an inside job.

This guy is a man of his word like none you have ever met, and if he says he doesnt believe that our government did 9/11 then he doesnt believe that was the case!

Roxdog - October 23, 2007 02:56 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (hamba @ Oct 16 2007, 05:44 AM)
Facts? what facts? Where are these facts?

Got any links? HUH?

Typical!!

I agree, people acting like little babies over their pet theories is pretty typical.

Ron Paul is the only candidate that I know of that has ever mentioned the "New World Order" by name. He is the ONLY candidate that has spoken out against it. Do you deny this?

QUOTE
Congressman Paul: " He asked if there was an international conspiracy to overthrow our government. The answer is "Yes". I think there are 25,000 individuals that have used offices of powers, and they are in our Universities and they are in our Congresses, and they believe in One World Government. And if you believe in One World Goverment, then you are talking about undermining National Sovereignty and you are talking about setting up something that you could well call a Dictatorship - and those plans are there!..."



QUOTE
Congressman Ron Paul -- I don't know what the best word is, but secret is pretty good. They're certainly not known to a lot of people; it's actually what they're doing. But then again, it's not absolute secrecy. If you look around you can usually get the information. There was a time when nobody even knew who was a member of the CFR or the Trilateral Commission. I think it's a bad sign that they're not as secret as they used to be. They're bolder now. They get on television and they give interviews. But there is an agenda. They're behind the scenes in many way -- very secretive. And, that was certainly the case on those individuals who planned and pushed us into the Iraqi War.


QUOTE
RP -- You know, their rhetoric suggests they might not like the United Nations, and you hear that often. They'll be complaining about the United Nations, and this and that. But, we have to remember, when it came time to get authority and a reason to go to war, they mentioned the United Nations twenty-one times in the authority, when we voted for the authority for the President to go to war when he felt like it.

I think what's going on, they're not anti-U.N., they're anti-U.N. if they don't do exactly what they want. Because there is a fascist-type faction that wants to keep the military/industrial complex going, and the oil control. Then there's the Kofi Annan-type guys. They are Socialists. They like world government.

Richard Perle, not too long ago, made a statement that he thought we should get out of the United Nations. Well, I think that's, sort of, to pacify some of our supporters. They figure, "Oh, this is great. We've never had a President so sharply critical of the United Nations." But in his mind, they may well be believing they are saving the United Nations or transforming the United Nations, rather than being opposed to world government.







ross11988 - October 23, 2007 03:00 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Roxdog @ Oct 23 2007, 02:56 PM)
QUOTE (hamba @ Oct 16 2007, 05:44 AM)
Facts? what facts? Where are these facts?

Got any links? HUH?

Typical!!

I agree, people acting like little babies over their pet theories is pretty typical.

Ron Paul is the only candidate that I know of that has ever mentioned the "New World Order" by name. He is the ONLY candidate that has spoken out against it. Do you deny this?

Exactly, and he talks about False Flags all the time. Wake UP PEOPLE. Who would you rather have? Hilary ?

Roxdog - October 23, 2007 03:04 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
The American Sovereignty Restoration Act is a bill, introduced by Representative Ron Paul, to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations. A report by Herbert W. Titus, Senior Legal Advisor of the Liberty Committee, concluded that "The American Sovereignty Restoration Act is the Only Viable Solution to the Continual Abuses by the United Nations"[1]. Paul has been introducing the bill since 1999.



ihatecreditors - October 24, 2007 05:51 AM (GMT)
if our constitution was in place none of this would have happened. None of these bad things would be what they are today. He doesn't support 911? Well we'll take care of that. But it would be one sure of a hell nice thing to prevent NWO and 911 from happening again... don't you think so? Is it about exposing 911 and thats it? Or is it about exposing NWO so we get rid of them?

System Of A Down - October 24, 2007 11:08 AM (GMT)
gun grabber,or carbon tax world government man.......or ron paul? :rolleyes:

Spengler - November 1, 2007 05:21 AM (GMT)
Ron Paul is just another bullshitter who knows very-well how to seduce his herd with a little bit of crap about the Constitution and some other patriotic garbage. Don't you idiots realize that the presidential elections have already been decided in favor of that witch named Hillary Clinton...definitively, the American populace can be labeled as a bunch of brutes and ignorants who are easy to manipulate.

esopxe - November 6, 2007 06:35 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (Spengler @ Oct 31 2007, 09:21 PM)
Ron Paul is just another bullshitter who knows very-well how to seduce his herd with a little bit of crap about the Constitution and some other patriotic garbage. Don't you idiots realize that the presidential elections have already been decided in favor of that witch named Hillary Clinton...definitively, the American populace can be labeled as a bunch of brutes and ignorants who are easy to manipulate.

I bet your just the life of the party.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree