The MEDIAWell the major networks are all owned by different corporations.
These corporations have vested interest in the largest umbrella corporation on earth, the Military industrial complex, or one might say the industries involved in weapons manufacturing, reconstruction, energy, ect everything that has a pay check tied to the allocation of money to the military. Corporations have "Boards of Directors." However the same people may serve on multiple "Board of Directors" for different corporations, and they do as I will explain.
For Example CBS is owned by Viacom so is MTV, VH1, and Nickelodeon. It's not just the news but the sitcoms and such as well that are part of the propaganda. Viacom is owned by Sumner Redstone. (originally Murray Rothstein) CNN is owned by AOl-TimeWarner. Warner Brothers is owned by Gerald Levin who is also part of the Trilateral commission. ABC is owned by Disney. Disney is owned by Michael Eisner. Fox is owned by the Rupert Murdoch News Corporation. MSNBC is obvioulsy influenced by Microsoft who holds 18% of the company but it was founded by none other than the corporate welfare sucking G.E. (who is deeply invested in the Israeli occupation). GE Universal is run by Edgar Bronfman, Jr the son of Edgar Bronfman president of the World Jewish Congress.
Members of the Board of Directors of these corporations sit on the BOD of the weapons manufactures and mega companies like Texaco, Chevron, Boeing, Lockheed, Citigroup, Rockwell Automation, Chase, Worldcom, JP Morgan, Halliburton etc.
Some are even in the government. For Example Chevron/Texaco merged with Unocal who got the largest and first no-bid contracts from Afghanistan. The Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice, was on the Board of Directors for Chevron/Texaco. They even named an oil tanker after her.

Lets look at some of this mess.
BOEINGJohn H. Biggs sits on the board of directors for both Boeing and JP Morgan & Chase. How nice to direct both a company and two banks. John E. Bryson is on the BOD with Boeing and also He is a director of The Walt Disney Company, who owns ABC. Linda Z. Cook the CEO of Shell is also on the BOD of Boeing.
more on boeing here disgusting isn't it.
LockheedLockheed is comprised of mainly ex-military and x-government employees in the defense industry. They got caught in the 70s financing the right-wing party the LDP in Japan who has open connections ot the Yakuza the Mafia times 100. Check out the Kodama Lackheed incident. ("Rokkeido jiken") They paid this mobster Kodama of the Kanto-kai and ties to the Yamaguchi-gume Yakuza wing (the largest one) 2 million in 1976 dollars to swing contracts for Lockheed. Lockheed's president at the time Carl Kotchian was forced to report in detail the company's long history secret payments to Kodama. It's a well known scandal in Japan as it was so disgraceful that 1)the Japanese government is full of mafia and 2) they got money from the very same company that built the planes that dropped the atomic bombs on Japan.
more here This was Japan's Watergate. But you wont hear about it in any standard history text books. Lockheed was busted bribing the Prime minister (Kakuei Tanaka) both the ministries of transportation and industry as well as setting up a $50,000 kickback to the president of All Nippon Airways for each plane sold. -*
Dick (45 million in Halliburton) Cheney's wife was on the BOD of Lockheed until 2001! Unbelievable, and Lockheed for the past 7 years in a row has gotten the largest government contracts normally tens of billions. Here is a list from 2005 back to 2000. As you can see Boein is in second every year.
Top 20 Defense contracts for 20051 Lockheed Martin Corp. $20 billion
2 Boeing Co. 18.8 billion
3 Northrop Grumman Corp. 13.7 billion
4 General Dynamics Corp. 11.1 billion
5 Raytheon Co. 9.4 billion
6 Halliburton Co. 5.9 billion
7 United Technologies Corp. 4.9 billion
8 L-3 Communications Holdings 4.8 billion
9 Carlyle Group 2.7 billion
10 SAIC 2.7 billion
11 BAE Systems 2.6 billion
12 General Electric Co. 2.5 billion
13 Computer Sciences Corp. 2.4 billion
14 Humana Inc. 2.2 billion
15 Textron Inc. 2.1 billion
16 Occupational Health Services 2 billion
17 ITT Industries 1.9 billion
18 Triwest Healthcare Alliance Co. 1.8 billion
19 URS Corp. 1.5 Billion
20 Bechtel Group Inc. 1.5 billion
Top 20 defense contracts for 2004Lockheed Martin Corporation $20,690,912,117
The Boeing Company $17,066,412,718
Northrup Grumman Corporation $11,894,090,277
General Dynamics Corporation $9,563,280,236
Raytheon Company $8,472,813,918
Halliburton Company $7,996,793,706
United Technologies Corporation $5,056,937,646
Science Applications International $2,450,781,108
Computer Sciences Corporation $2,390,806,128
Humana, INC $2,372,078,226
L-3 Communications Holding, INC $2,260,292,852
BAE Systems PLC $2,192,647,377
Health Net, INC $1,899,824,940
General Electric Company, INC $1,822,720,199
Bechtel Group, INC $1,742,470,267
Bell Boeing Joint Program $1,539,815,440
ITT Industries, INC $1,539,742,075
Electronic Data Systems Corp $1,538,272,307
Honeywell International, INC $1,462,914,723
Carlyle Group $1,442,680,416
Top 10 defense contracts in 2002 before the Iraq war.1 Lockheed Martin Corp. $17.0 billion
2 Boeing Co. $16.6 billion
3 Northrop Grumman Corp. $8.7 billion
4 Raytheon Co. $7.0 billion
5 General Dynamics Corp. $7.0 billion
6 United Technologies Corp. $3.6 billion
7 Science Applications International Corp. $2.1 billion
8 TRW Inc. $2.0 billion
9 Health Net, Inc. $1.7 billion
10 L-3 Communications Holdings, Inc. $1.7 billion
As you can See every Year Lockheen Martain is at the top by a large gap followed by Boeing and Northrop Grumman Corporation. Notice that Carlyle and General Electric and Halliburton are in there as well. We are giving them BILLIONS, actually tens of Billions Almost as much as what Churches send to Israel. Please now read this
I got these figures from their own fricking websites. Go ahead and comb them with a fine tooth comb. These are not secrets. This is right out in the open. These are not secret societies, these are companies in the MIC who profiteer from war and who own our mass media.
Lets look at number 3
Northrop Grumman Corp.They also have a hand in glove relationship with the government. They have been in the government.
Vic Fazio
Senior Advisor at Northrop
Quote:
"Vic Fazio served as a Member of Congress for 20 years representing California's third congressional district. During that time, he served as a member of the Armed Services, Budget and Ethics Committees and was a member of the House Appropriations Committee where he served as Subcommittee Chair or ranking member for 18 years
Kevin Sharner and Philip Frost both on the BOD at Northrop are or have been on the BOD of major Pharmaceutical companies.
It just gets more nasty the more you look
I will let you look up the rest on your own. Just grab some of the names from these list and look at their BODs. Needless to say they are all one happy corporate killing family. Nothing makes them more money than warfare. And nothing is currently a larger cash cow than the Zionist occupation of Palestine which also has the financing of super right wing Christian churches who get the benefit of air time from the networks for preaching the message that is best for the warmongers and investing their money into their stocks. More on that whole mess and the iron triangle etc
here.Multi-national corporations run our press and government. They tie back to the privately owned central banks. long story short the MSM is full of shit.
More on the MIC, Defense spending
Our senate voted on the new bill for Defense spending 100 for and 0 against it. That's 100% for giving more money to the MIC and ZERO opposition.
Some interesting parts I found:
(Sec. 8024) Authorizes DOD to incur obligations of up to $350 million for DOD military compensation, construction projects, and supplies and services in anticipation of receipts of contributions from the government of Kuwait. -source
(Sec. 8082) Earmarks specified RDT&E funds for producing Arrow missile components in the United States and Arrow missile components and missiles in Israel to meet Israel's defense requirements. -source
There was this Amendment, but it got rejected.
S.AMDT.4875 to H.R.5631 To increase by $200,000,000 the amount appropriated or otherwise made available by title IX for the purpose of supplying needed humanitarian assistance to the innocent Lebanese and Israeli civilians who have been affected by the hostilities between Hezbollah and the Government of Israel.
8/3/2006 Amendment SA 4875 ruled out of order by the chair -source click Amendments and go to the very bottom of the page.
They can spend money to build missile but not to help civilians wounded or left homeless by missiles Israel used of a civilian population in Lebanon. The Amendment said Israeli and Lebanese civilians the problem being Lebanon had 2.5 billion damages and Israel specifically targeted civilian areas where as Hezbollah didn't.
And nothing is covered with more of a bias than the occupation of Palestine. THE KEY ISSUE. Watch a long film on that here or a short film
here
911 was a spring board for these on going wars. You already know why the press wont touch it. So WHO do you think took part in 911???
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let's jump back to Iraq. The media has not covered crucial aspect of the war in Iraq either. The televised press still has not mentioned AIPAC's spy ring yet they have reported outright lies about Iraq and Iran. There has also been no mention of the Niger Forgeries or the deeper aspects of the Plame affair that being why Bush ordered her ousted and how did Jeff Gannon (male hooker working for a fake news agency) make reference to internal government memos about it?! Where is the US press that could simply explain in one sentence that the wall Israel is building is not even on their boarder but cuts into Palestine? Where was the US's coverage of the mk77 dropped all over Fallujah? How about the obvious theater like production of the toppling of the Saddam statue in Iraq that British press could report in the same language and yet the Majority of Americans remain blissfully in the dark about it. There have been so many lies, not just about war....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ATTA story is a smoking gun.Answering some common questions.
Here is a question you may have asked yourself. If 911 was an inside job (and I believe it was) then why was there so much prior knowledge of the attacks? Granted it was ignored, but how could there be intelligence of an Al Qaeda ring in the US and all those pilots going to flight schools and the warning about Bin Laden wanted to attack America if the said hijackers didn't do it (which is evident by some of them still being alive) ?
Why risk them getting busted if they were patsies? Since the hijackers didn't do it how was there any evidence of them planning an attack that they didn't do and obviously didn't even know about considering they were going to get the blame?
Furthermore if the government really did 911 then why leak information about your own patsies and look like incompetent fools when the warnings were ignored?
The prior knowledge arguments have evidence. They do two things. They make the Bush administration look incompetent for not acting on supplied information but it also looks like the attacks could have been prevented had Bush and co only read the memos they were being given. What that does is make it appear like the attack was done by Arab terrorists. The Democrats naturally jumped all over this a chance to make Republicans look bad yet still blame 911 of Arab terrorists.
Someone was dropping hints and information to imply that the terrorists were Arabs and mainly from Saudi Arabia. Why did they frame Saudi Arabia if it was a frame and they were patsies then why not use at least one Iraqi after all that is who they wanted to attack and did attack after 911. Why Saudi Arabia?
The answer is clear when you understand who really carried out 911. The Israeli Mossad and their Neocon moles and the blackmail controlled shills.
OK so let's put some facts together. Someone obviously wanted to pin the 911 terrorists attacks on Muslim Arabs.
[size=16]One of the most laughable parts of the 911 story was the FBI finding Atta's unburned passport two blocks away from the twin towers. What a crock. Atta's pass port had been reported stolen in 1999 magically that missing and stolen pas port is the same one that was found at ground zero. Geee someone must have put it there for the FBI to find in order to implicate Muslim Arab terrorists.
Who could that be? Who got caught on 911 in a white van that had traces of explosives in it and worked for a moving company which turned out to be a front for the Israeli Mossad? 5 Israeli agents got caught and the first thing out of their mouths was
Quote:
"We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem."
Gosh an English speaking x-military explosives expert cheering and taking pictures of the WTC burning towers in in NY on 911 who worked for a fake moving company in the Mossad driving a van that had a hit with bomb sniffing dogs and over 4 thousand dollars stuffed in a sock is nothing to be concerned about. Sivan Kurzberg could still say with a straight face. "It wasn't me, blame the Palestinians."
Shortly after 911 we had two different Anthrax letters trying to blame 911 on the Arabs. One read
Quote:
"You cannot stop us. We have this anthrax. You die now. Are you afraid? Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great."
and the other read
Quote:
This is next. Take Penacilin now. Death to America. Death to Israel. Allah is great."
Death to America and Death to Israel. Gee, I wonder who really wrote it? Might it be Israel?
Rudi Dekkers was Atta's or someone pretending to be Atta's flight instructor in Florida. Note that we know the The Israeli Mossad was living next door to Atta in Florida (supposedly monitoring him).
Now Rudi Dekkers discovered that Atta could not speak German. Mohamed Atta lived in Hamburg Germany yet suddenly he must have forgotten ohw to speak German. Dekkers a Dutch citizen tried to converse with Atta who stared at him and had to ignore him eventually leaving for Boston.
Quote:
This is eerily similar to the way in which Zacharias Moussaoui (the so-called "20th hijacker") became "belligerent" when his Minnesota flight instructor tried to speak to him in French (his first language), at the beginning of that course. The Minnesota Star Tribune reported on December 21, 2001: also here
"The real Atta would have been able to respond to his instructor's German small talk and the real Moussaoui would have been able to respond to his instructor's French small talk." quoted from here
Well SOMEBODY was trying to create information about Arab Hijackers training for 911. SOMEBODY was living next to their partner Atta framer. No wonder Atta was seen so many times on the casino ships with Jack Abramoff. He was not Atta he was the Mossad's own boy. They killed the real Atta.
SOMEBODY left his passport at ground zero and then somebody wrote letters for the anthrax attacks steering Americas rage onto Israel's enemies.
Back to the Saudi question. So why there? To understand this one would have to be aware of the foiled Mossad plot in Mexico. To be brief the OIl rich Mexico was being set up to ally with the US by way of another false flag operation. But the plot was foiled and the Israelis busted with Hand grenades and TNT. I really encourage you to get my book Welcome to the USSA. Cut oil off from the Sauds.... Blame the Anthrax attacks on an Egyptian... invent false Al Qaeda connections with Iraq... say Osama is in Afghanistan.... cook up lies about Iran having nukes or making peole wear yellow satrs... Someone is not at war with terrorists but with Israel's enemies. We KNOW they lied about Iraq. I assure you Bin Laden is already dead. And We know they are lying about 911.
The question no longer remains who did it? We know the specific names. We know who made the OSP and wrote PNAC who put the bombs in the towers and when and I gave a good theory as to why and how it was covered up by showing how the press works.