I hope you like it B)

Part1 YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBOel-LyJ_E
Part2 YouTube : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3ePuE0tvp4
Google Video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5712953049463929480

Hmm, I never realized theres demolitions with no visible flashes or plumes. Interesting.

I saw another recent WTC7 short on youtube, had the full Barry Jennings interview(who was threatened by pro Bush war loving debunkers and psychos) about him being in WTC7 on 9/11

HQ XviD download

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=I0V3WV66

Nice work arie :), its funny how you showed those falling buildings. One even looked like someone laid it on his back.

could a mod please move this to the Building 7 subforum? Thanks!

Mate, this video is awesome! Nice work ;)

You made that one Arie ?

Goed werk man!

good video
upload to stage6 as well

8bitagent,

Check this old hospital that Jowenko blew up recently

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UqUgIuWW3pM

I see no flash at all, and it is even stripped. My hypothesis is that since wt7 was non-stripped possible flashes were covered. And it is public info that the experts only need to work on the lower two floors, that is what CD Inc. told in an interview.

Do we have a timeline for wtc7 evac's? Do you think it possible that explosives could have been planted in WTC7 after the first plane had crashed or around that time. My thinking is that this process would take some time but if a company was good enough It might be poss. or it could have been a 2 part process with part of the explosives being placed inside before hand and the major part being done on 9/11.

Thanks, but stage6 does not accept it for some reason. I have reencoded it with DivX but still it doesn't work.

If anybody can reencode it so that it will work, please be my guest. The HQ XviD can be downloaded here:

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=I0V3WV66

got the link to that barry jennigns interview? We need to make sure this (and him) do not "disappear".

hey I started watching, and I noticed something...

There seems to be a flash at the top of the building at 42-43 seconds into the google link above...

Just as WTC7 descends below the line of other buildings, there's a bright flash at the top.

That would seem likely if it were first blown on the supports, and then as it fell, continued to have charges go from bottom to top...

can anyone take a look and let us know if you agree that it is a genuine flash?

Excellent job!

Great video!

Good work! I esp liked how you put the videos and quotes from NIST/FEMA
and also the comparisons between WTC7 and controlled demolition.

It takes weeks to clear and prep a building for demolition, not just a few hours.

I think the fact that building came down means that if key to structures were to fail, the building would collapse.

I guess what surprises me is how many are willing to accept a random fire
could heat specific fire proofed beams and columns and cause a global collapse but bringing the same building down with well placed explosives would take weeks.

It takes weeks because the demolition needs to be precise. A random firestorm has no such considerations.

Exactly a random "firestorm" did the same work that needs precise organization and months of preparation..

File expired, uploaded again

http://www.megaupload.com/?d=6F72WLB8

Great vid. Here's the most interesting part:

Pay close attention to the account of one of the first responders Kevin McPadden.


"He told me, we're thinking about bringing the building down...he came back with his hand over the radio and what sounded like a countdown...at the last second he took his hand off and you heard 3, 2, 1...and then all you the sudden you hear (massive) explosions (just before the building comes down)."

--Kevin McPadden, first responder, former Airforce medic



--McPadden was told they were going to deliberately bring the building down, shortly before it comes down....then he hears the countdown...3...2...1...just before the explosives went off.


In other words, more absolute proof of controlled demolition.