http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/content/....php?content.21Part 1: TWA Flight 679
On Sept 12th 2001 two Indian men, Mohamed Jaweed Azmath and Syed Gul Mohamed Shah (also known as Ayub Ali Khan) were detained as part of the investigation into the terrorist attacks of Sept 11th. Their charges were eventually changed to credit card fraud. I suspect that what we may be seeing here is a very good indication of the modus operandi of the men who took over the planes. Read the summary and read the references to get the full picture.
Azmath and Shah (Khan) with hair
Heads shaved prior to hijacking? Does the guy on the left look Indian?
� They were in the air on TWA Flight 679 (1) from Newark to San Antonio at the same time as the other attacks were being carried out (2).
� Their flight was forced to land in St. Louis, Missouri, when the Federal Aviation Administration closed the skies after the hijackings (2).
� They continued their journey on an Amtrak train. They were arrested outside Forth Worth, Texas, during a routine drug inspection of the train (3).
� When they were arrested they were carrying $5,500 cash, two flat box-cutter type knives, and hair dye, and Azmath had copies of numerous passport photos (2).
� They showed signs of extreme nervousness and evasiveness when questioned (2).
� Khan and Azmath had close-cropped hair and had shaved most of their body hair (2) - as per the instructions in the final letter to the hijackers (4).
� From reference (2): On the flight from Newark, Azmath and Khan had two checked pieces of luggage and carried a briefcase belonging to Khan and a trash bag. When officers inspected the bag, they "found paraphernalia that could assist in the altering of the appearance of the subjects," the report says. They also found photocopies of Azmath's passports, showing him alternatively clean shaven and with a full beard. There were also receipts for wire transfers, empty cash envelopes with dates written on them, and letters in Arabic.
� They had access to large sums of money (this is two guys working on a news stand.) Some sources report that they sent $64000 to India 2 years before (1), where others report that they sent it to Pakistan (14) which is much more interesting since they were supposedly Indian nationals. (I smell cover-up)
� Like many of the other hijackers at least one of them had flight training, this time in Arlington, Texas (5) (6) (7) (8).
� They had lived in the US for around 6 or 7 years: However, public records show that, as recently as last June, both men listed their residence as an apartment at 1025 W. Hollywood Ave. on Chicago's North Side (9).
� The FBI have dismissed them as hijackers largely because they were the only people fitting the profile on that plane, and because there are no known links to the other hijackers (1).
� A man named Subash Gurung from Nepal was arrested in November at O'Hare International Airport in Chicago, Illinois, when he tried to board a flight with nine knives, a can of Mace and a stun gun. Would you believe where he lived? The same apartment building as listed above (10). A government source told CNN that Khan never actually lived in the apartment in Chicago and never actually worked there.
� Gurung claimed that he had brought all those weapons onto the plane by mistake. He was also carrying a fake or stolen ID. Is there a pattern forming here?(11) The name on the ID was Aishwarya Gurung (13)
� Gurung's case also appears to have been dismissed as a misdemeanour (12). Neither Gurung, Azmath or Shah (Khan) ever actually appeared to have lived in the apartment building in Chicago. But, the source said, "many phone calls were made to and from that apartment, and credit card bills were paid from that address."
Subash Gurung - not your typical Al Qaeda representative, so just who is he?
There are far too many coincidences here, so why is it being covered up? Why are these men being let go or prosecuted for other charges? If they really were credit card fraudsters why did they shave their body hair? These men seem to have used multiple identities and addresses. Just who are these people? Was this plane perhaps destined to hit one of the Sears Towers?
The San Antonio Connection
Most people who know a little about the official investigation would consider Florida to be the centre of the hijackers activities. Little or nothing is mentioned about any of the hijackers being in San Antonio, Texas. Once again, the names, the coincidences and the apparent lack of interest in key areas would indicate another cover-up.
� he picture on the right shows a man called Dr Al-Badr Al-Hazmi who works (or worked) at the U.T. Health Science Center (1), which is located close to Lackland Airforce Base, San Antonio (2).
� Al-Hazmi's credit card was used by two of the hijackers to buy their plane tickets (2).
� Two men named Saeed Alghamdi (Hijacker suspect on flight 93) and Ahmed Alghamdi (Flight 175) had previously attended Lackland Airforce Base for training (2).
� The FBI stated that Dr Al-Hazmi had used the alias Khalid Al Midhar (Hijacker on flight 77) (4). Is this the reason the FBI now think the real Khalid Al Midhar is still alive?
� USA Today reported: Law enforcement documents obtained by USA TODAY suggest that Alhazmi has used false identification bearing the name of another hijacker, Khalid al Midhar (10). Are we looking at something similar to Azmath and Shah? Were Azmath and Shah on their way to meet him?
� Dr Al Hazmi was held from Sept 12th to 24th without access to counsel and his detention location was kept secret (3).
So now we have three hijacker names linked to San Antonio and a military base. How could Al Qaeda have gained access to Lackland Air force Base, Al-Hazmi's credit card and presumably classified information about previous students?
But there's more going on here in this sunny Texas city:
� Salem Alhazmi (flight 77) and Satam M.A. Al Suqami (flight 11) lived at the Spanish Trace Apartments, San Antonio earlier in 2001 (5).
� Former residents identified the two by photographs, but said the names appear to be switched (5). (Get your head round that one!)
� A local pilot shop employee identified one of the 19 hijackers (Salem Alhazmi) as a frequent visitor to the store (6).
� The guy who worked in the shop remembered him because he asked for a pilot operator's handbook for a 757 or 767. He offered to order it for him but he seemed to be no longer interested (6).
� The FBI say that the Salem Alhazmi who lived in the Spanish Trace Apartments (that's the guy on the right?) attended Alpha Tango flight school (San Antonio) and is still alive in Saudi Arabia (7). (So why is his photo still on the FBI Site???) Salem Alhazmi is living in Saudi Arabia, another victim of a stolen passport, he hasn't left home for several years proving that the man in Spanish Trace Apartments was not him (11). It would appear to have been a man using his identity and pretending to be a pilot. (Are we seeing a pattern here?)
� According to the FBI Satam Al Suqami only arrived in April 2001 and Salem Alhazmi arrived in June 2001 (12).
� Interestingly a guy called Abdul Hakim Murad, who was convicted several years ago of a plot to crash a suicide plane into CIA headquarters, also trained at Alpha Tango (8). ("How could we have prepared for this sort of attack, nothing like this has happened before etc. etc.")
� Another witness claims Ziad Jarrah (Flight 93) was among a large group of Middle Eastern men using an apartment near Lackland Air Force Base in the summer of 2001 (9).
A point which needs clarification: Salem Alhazmi is alive and in Saudi Arabia. The photo published by the FBI is of the living Salem Alhazmi, who has never been to the US. So there was a guy who looked just like him using the name Satam M. A. Al Suqami living in Spanish Trace apartments. Did someone alter their appearance to look like the Saudi Salem Alhazmi although using Suqami's name? Clear as mud.
So what IS going on here? Six hijacker names linked to San Antonio plus the two on flight 679? The usual tale of stolen identities and people turning up alive?
To be continued.......
References for TWA 679
1.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2.../25/72623.shtml2.
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/10/29/inv.terro....investigation/3.
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/01/16/inv.terror.investigation/4.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2...29/154226.shtml5.
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nati...51_probe07.html6.
http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2002/national...rks/092901.html7.
http://www.ict.org.il/spotlight/det.cfm?id=6768.
http://www.jime.or.jp/html/usterror/20010919/saudi-2.html9.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/showcas...ewsspecials-hed10.
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/11/04/inv.ohare.arrest/11.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2.../5/163430.shtml12.
http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/11/05/inv.ohare.security.breach/13.
http://news.findlaw.com/cnn/docs/terrorism...ng110501cmp.pdf14.
http://old.smh.com.au/news/0110/08/world/world4.htmlReferences for San Antonio
1.
http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla...=161&xlc=2988352.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/printout/0...,176069,00.html3.
http://www.criminaljustice.org/public.nsf/...61?opendocument4.
http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla...=161&xlc=3064605.
http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla...=161&xlc=3425306.
http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla...=161&xlc=3482977.
http://news.mysanantonio.com/story.cfm?xla...=161&xlc=3517728.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article....RTICLE_ID=279169.
http://www.reporternews.com/2001/texas/agent0922.html10.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2001/0...vestigation.htm11.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/september11/stor...,601550,00.html12.
http://cooperativeresearch.org/completetim...ttee092602.html