Title: A New Inquiry
Description: A thread for Roscoe
jakeb - September 12, 2007 01:46 PM (GMT)
Roscoe suggested that there needs to be a new inquiry into 911. I proposed the following questions, which he wanted me to place in a new thread.
| QUOTE (roscoe) |
| Tell you what we'll discuss that on another thread. |
As you wish, Roscoe
The questions are:
- Who would conduct this new inquiry?
- Who wound finance said inquiry?
jakeb - September 17, 2007 05:09 PM (GMT)
In case there is any confusion, Roscoe.....this is where you can answer my questions about the "enquiry" [sic] you are requesting.
HeadSpin - September 17, 2007 11:09 PM (GMT)
Powerhouse - September 18, 2007 03:44 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (HeadSpin @ Sep 17 2007, 06:09 PM) |
| why don't you set up a poll |
???
His questions have nothing to do with anything a poll could tell us. Are you suggesting he set up a poll just for roscoe to respond to?
jakeb - September 18, 2007 03:46 AM (GMT)
Roscoe wanted to
| QUOTE (roscoe) |
| discuss that on another thread. |
No need for a poll.
roscoe - September 18, 2007 04:04 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 12 2007, 08:46 AM) |
- Who would conduct this new inquiry?
- Who wound finance said inquiry? |
Already answered this.
Who would conduct this new Independent enquiry?
People who are independent. Have no vested interest
Who would finance said enquiry?
$3 trillion spent on a war without any warrant. Stupid question.
Enquiry means not just a load of stuffed shirts sitting in a room but a hunt for new evidence and witnesses. i.e. Police and Firefighters
However one former senior White House aid has already said that there is enough evidence already to indict Dick Cheyne for treason over his conduct on September 11th 2001. So we don't need an enquiry here, just an arrest.
jakeb - September 18, 2007 04:19 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) |
| QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 12 2007, 08:46 AM) |
- Who would conduct this new inquiry?
- Who wound finance said inquiry? |
Already answered this.
Who would conduct this new Independent enquiry?
People who are independent. Have no vested interest
|
People who are independent of what?
Government money? Ties to New York? Ties to oil companies? Ties to airlines? Where do you draw the line?
Give us a few examples....(names of people who meet your requirements)
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) |
Who would finance said enquiry?
$3 trillion spent on a war without any warrant. Stupid question. |
Please answer the question, who would finance this inquiry? The government?
If that is the case, the people performing the inquiry are being paid by the government, do these people then cease to be "independent"?
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) |
| However one former senior White House aid has already said that there is enough evidence already to indict Dick Cheyne for treason over his conduct on September 11th 2001. So we don't need an enquiry here, just an arrest. |
Source, please.
roscoe - September 18, 2007 04:36 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 17 2007, 11:19 PM) |
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) | | QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 12 2007, 08:46 AM) |
- Who would conduct this new inquiry?
- Who wound finance said inquiry? |
Already answered this.
Who would conduct this new Independent enquiry?
People who are independent. Have no vested interest
|
People who are independent of what?
Government money? Ties to New York? Ties to oil companies? Ties to airlines? Where do you draw the line?
Give us a few examples....(names of people who meet your requirements)
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) |
Who would finance said enquiry?
$3 trillion spent on a war without any warrant. Stupid question. |
Please answer the question, who would finance this inquiry? The government?
If that is the case, the people performing the inquiry are being paid by the government, do these people then cease to be "independent"?
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) | | However one former senior White House aid has already said that there is enough evidence already to indict Dick Cheyne for treason over his conduct on September 11th 2001. So we don't need an enquiry here, just an arrest. |
Source, please.
|
Already answered bye bye.
Source please?
Put Dick Cheyne indictment for treason in Google
jakeb - September 18, 2007 01:41 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:36 AM) |
| QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 17 2007, 11:19 PM) | | QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) | | QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 12 2007, 08:46 AM) |
- Who would conduct this new inquiry?
- Who wound finance said inquiry? |
Already answered this.
Who would conduct this new Independent enquiry?
People who are independent. Have no vested interest
|
People who are independent of what?
Government money? Ties to New York? Ties to oil companies? Ties to airlines? Where do you draw the line?
Give us a few examples....(names of people who meet your requirements)
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) |
Who would finance said enquiry?
$3 trillion spent on a war without any warrant. Stupid question. |
Please answer the question, who would finance this inquiry? The government?
If that is the case, the people performing the inquiry are being paid by the government, do these people then cease to be "independent"?
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) | | However one former senior White House aid has already said that there is enough evidence already to indict Dick Cheyne for treason over his conduct on September 11th 2001. So we don't need an enquiry here, just an arrest. |
Source, please.
|
Already answered bye bye.
|
Wow. Are we in the twilight zone here?
Evasion noted.
The question was not answered.
| QUOTE |
| People who are independent. Have no vested interest |
Names, please.
And what do these people have to be independent of?
Do they cease to be independent if they are paid by the government?
Are you suggesting that the new inquiry be funded by the US government?
(Dick Cheney BS ignored because you cited no source and it's Off-topic.)
jakeb - September 20, 2007 02:41 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 18 2007, 01:41 PM) |
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:36 AM) | | QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 17 2007, 11:19 PM) | | QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) | | QUOTE (jakeb @ Sep 12 2007, 08:46 AM) |
- Who would conduct this new inquiry?
- Who wound finance said inquiry? |
Already answered this.
Who would conduct this new Independent enquiry?
People who are independent. Have no vested interest
|
People who are independent of what?
Government money? Ties to New York? Ties to oil companies? Ties to airlines? Where do you draw the line?
Give us a few examples....(names of people who meet your requirements)
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) |
Who would finance said enquiry?
$3 trillion spent on a war without any warrant. Stupid question. |
Please answer the question, who would finance this inquiry? The government?
If that is the case, the people performing the inquiry are being paid by the government, do these people then cease to be "independent"?
| QUOTE (roscoe @ Sep 18 2007, 04:04 AM) | | However one former senior White House aid has already said that there is enough evidence already to indict Dick Cheyne for treason over his conduct on September 11th 2001. So we don't need an enquiry here, just an arrest. |
Source, please.
|
Already answered bye bye.
|
Wow. Are we in the twilight zone here?
Evasion noted.
The question was not answered.
| QUOTE | | People who are independent. Have no vested interest |
Names, please.
And what do these people have to be independent of?
Do they cease to be independent if they are paid by the government?
Are you suggesting that the new inquiry be funded by the US government?
(Dick Cheney BS ignored because you cited no source and it's Off-topic.)
|
Bump for Roscoe....who still hasn't named anyone who would be involved with this investigation, or who/what they have to be "independent" from...