The Flight 93-Shanksville area of 9-11 investigation is definitely the most overlooked, but it may ultimately be the smoking gun.

Check out this new book. It's called PHANTOM FLIGHT 93 published by the American Free Press:

http://www.wingtv.net/flight93x.html

- First-hand eyewitness testimony of a missile being launched into Shanksville, which resulted in a massive hoax and cover-up being perpetrated on the American people.

- Claims that emergency rooms in Shanksville were originally notified to be prepared for victims from TWO separate airplane crash sites.

- The emergence of three (or more) wreckage-debris sites in Southwest Pennsylvania, not simply one as the government alleges.

- Irrefutable evidence that there was NO plane at Shanksville, but instead Flight 93 (or something purporting to be Flight 93) actually crash landed in New Baltimore, Pa.

- Admissions by the Department of Defense based on seismographic data that the government blatantly lied about its Flight 93 timeline.

- 9-11 Deconstructed: What Went Wrong – how the real devils behind 9-11 blew it – a list of six major tactical blunders that allowed researchers to expose the lies of this horrific event, along with a brief history of other failed examples of state-sponsored terrorism, including OKC, the USS Liberty, and WTC ’93.

- 9-11 Passenger List oddities, including the mystery of Todd and Lisa Beamer

- Plus gag orders, faked cell phone calls, human remains found at Indian Lake marina, a confession that the U.S. military shot down a plane on the morning of 9-11, and much more.

Phantom Flight 93: The Shanksville-Flight 93 Hoax completely shreds the government’s ‘official’ version of events, and reveals that something far more sinister occurred near Shanksville, Pa. on the morning of 9-11 than was ever revealed to the American public.

Fascinating. Seems to mimic my own findings from going there........

Also, WingTV, like mr terrorcell, is disinfo and exists purely to inject nonsense into the discourse of the 9/11 Truth Movement. I am not at all surprised to hear mr terrorcell agreeing with WingTV above for everybody's benefit.

WingTV - Trashing The Truth
http://www.rense.com/general65/wing.htm
"Viewing WING TV.......I almost laughed out loud."

Alex Jones refused to invite WingTV onto his radio show to talk about their new book. Jim Hoffman of 911Review.com also singled out WingTV, along with 911Review.org and scholarsFor911Truth.org as an example of a disinfo or 'disassembling' site:

'Given how much was invested in the success of the attack, it is only reasonable to expect that elaborate deceptions would be crafted to confuse and discredit the skeptics. A raft of websites have popped up since the attack promoting theories ranging from patently absurd to subtle hoaxes. An effective tool for reinforcing the loony conspiricism meme is the introduction of theories that that have no basis in evidence, such as the idea that no planes hit the towers. The association of these ideas with the careful research of investigators in the 9/11 Truth Movement stands to set back the cause of awakening the larger public to the facts of the attack:

WING TV
'Lip service to the core facts of the attack is sometimes used in dissembling sites to establish bona fides within segments of the 9/11 Truth Movement. For example, Victor Thorn, on the WingTV website, writes in "9-11 Bottom Line: Explosives in the WTC":'

WINGTV Quote:

'This position will sound reasonable to most people who accept that the Twin Towers were destroyed through controlled demolition -- a position supported by evidence provided in The World Trade Center Attack section of this website. However, the article provides no links or references to any other work backing up the allegation of explosive demolition. Elsewhere on the site, Victor Thorn attacks Jim Hoffman for his essay deconstructing the theory that no 757 hit the Pentagon. Hoffman's reply to Thorn's attack provides the links to source articles that are conspicuously absent from the attack piece.

Thorn's attack piece and site also fail to note that Hoffman has assembled some of the most compelling evidence for the explosive demolition of the Twin Towers, such as slideshow talks presented to numerous audiences. Nor does the WingTV site have a single link to wtc7.net or its subdomains, for example. This pattern of omission is a tool used by other dissemblers to appear to support a position while actually undermining it.'

http://www.911review.com/disinfo/sites.html

Why is Lisa Beamer mysterious?

I have no idea. I know that the administration manipulated her like they did Pat Tillman and Jessica Lynch, but I know people who've met her and she's been rpetty beaten up by the entire thing.

This book is GARBAGE. I had the original version when they put out looking like an afficemax bound TPS report. There's little in terms of facts and a lot in terms of assuptions, absurdities and distortions.

But I thought most knew to expect that from WingTV.

Careful, TC.

These Wing TV guys have a long history of attacking other truthers and spreading disinfo. Especially the title "phantom flight 93" is misleading as more and more evidence comes out that this phantom survived the Shanksville crash for much longer than only the two minutes until New Baltimore. Just listen to the NORAD tapes.

I explicitly don't want to attack your findings which I find very interesting. But I don't trust this couple as far as I can spit.