Proof Here

They edited missile eyewitness Susan McElwain's testimony. This exposes the History Channel's hit piece as the shameless excuse for journalism it is.

- Tom Spinelli, 28 - was working at India Lake Marina, a mile and a half away. "I saw the white plane," he said. "It was flying around all over the place like it was looking for something. I saw it before and after the crash." -Daily Mirror (9/13/02)

- Dale Browning "It's the damndest darn thing," said Dale Browning, a farmer. "Everybody's seen this thing in the sky, but no one can tell us what it is." -The Bergen Record (9/14/01) (watch the disinfo people pick up on this guy).

- Rick Chaney described the plane as a Lear-jet type, with engines mounted near the tail and painted white with no identifying markings. -The Bergen Record (9/14/01)

- Dennis Decker"As soon as we looked up, we saw a midsized jet flying low and fast," Decker said. "It appeared to make a loop or part of a circle, and then it turned fast and headed out." Decker and Chaney described the plane as a Lear-jet type, with engines mounted near the tail and painted white with no identifying markings. -The Bergen Record (9/14/01)

- Susan Custer said she saw a small white jet streaking overhead. -The Bergen Record (9/14/01)

- Robin Doppstadt was working inside her family food-and-supply store when she heard the crash. When she went outside, she said, she saw a small white jet that looked like it was making a single circle over the crash site. "Then it climbed very quickly and took off. "

- Susan Mcelwain "There's no way I imagined this plane - it was so low it was virtually on top of me. It was white with no markings but it was definitely military, it just had that look. "It had two rear engines, a big fin on the back like a spoiler on the back of a car and with two upright fins at the side."


I was just wondering, Lord Tsukasa. Where do the witnesses describe the small white plane they all said they saw as a missile?

You listed 7 names.

How many of those people have you spoken with?

I've spoken with more than 1 of them and they collaborate each other.

Why do you place all trust on the published testimony, when McElwain's actually been interviewed, and she is on video now saying that it was not a plane. She describes a missile. It was white with no markings and no wings. That's basically how she described it. She said she didn't see any wings. A no-wings, no-markings, white aircraft sounds like a missile to me.

Why do you ignore her statement of the "spoiler"? Do you believe missiles have spoilers with two upright fins?
I suspect this plane was a beechcraft starship of Raytheon.

Just so everyone knows, the word missile can mean;

1. a rocket carrying passengers or instruments or a warhead
2. a weapon that is thrown or projected
3. a weapon thrown or projected or intended to be projected, as a
lance, an arrow, or a bullet.

To base your evidence of what is in the air by a witness description of a “missile” is not enough. More detail is needed, especially if you are going to make accusations.

Ranb

How many witnesses would you need before you believed it was something other than you were told?