Why would the BBC, or Disney (GE) for that matter, spend time and money to attempt to counter the chorus of voices who have doubts about the official story -- if they were not worried about the growing movement who have questions about 9/11?

We know the major news outlets and network owners are not philanthropists. They don't spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on productions unless they either have propaganda to disseminate or money to make.

The fact that certain people post on these forums, in a futile attempt to debunk research done by the 9/11 truth community, is another example of why I am skeptical of the official story. After all, if we are truly isolated kooks with paranoid tendencies and ridiculous assertions, why bother?

I guess Saddam really did work hand in glove with Al (CIA)da, and stored those nasty WMD where we just couldn't find them too.

I suppose Alberto Gonzales (and countless other administration officals) really couldn't recollect what he'd done, when he did it, or who did it with.

And I imagine that if the Washington Times prints it, or if Judith Miller writes it, it must be true.

There is so much push-back and pressure against the so-called "truth movement" that it is obvious someone somewhere is pretty damn worried. Why?

Such thoughts roll through this skeptic's mind... make of it what you may.

maybe its because they think it will get ratings....

So, your saying because people are arguing against you, it means you must be right... that makes a whole lot of sense. I bother because I can't stand idiocy, which I am trying to eradicate from the earth, and have failed so far aparently.

WTF!!!! :angry: How the hell did we defend these actions by saying that there was no conspiracy about 911!!!! I hate Bush. I hate him, he is one of the worst presidents in history. My rebuttal to your arguments has nothing to do with a defense of Bush, so STFU.

You logic is backwards in some many ways that it is impossible for you to ever be a legitimate person, let alone convince any sane person.

Yet at the same time your rebuttle lacks any kind of thought other than name calling. Debunkers are all alike. Try again when your older.

Ahhh but the so called Debunkers (particularly JREFians^TM) are old and wizened and have seen it all before so you have to give them latitude to make Ad Hominems. ;)

Dear Skep,

When you have to resort to name-calling or foul language or bashing a poster who in no way singled you out for anything, you've already lost.

Try again.

There is a lot of push-back against the 9/11 truth movement. From major corporations, major media. We know that the media lies and tries to re-write history and gets paid to present government propaganda as real news. We know all this.

So why do you defend it? Why do you trust what you read in the Post or see on Fox (or NBC, ABC, Disney, etc etc...)? Why exactly do you believe what you believe? Who do you trust? Where do you get your opinions from?

I know it's hard to believe that anyone we may consider friends could do 9/11. But it's so damn easy to consider that Osama did it. Why is that? Someone did it. Take a look. We ascribe the events of that day to someone. What makes Osama vile and foul? Do we know who he is? I know he was being paid and equipped by the CIA for years. What a perfect patsy! Why has he never been caught? Why is he not even wanted for 9/11?

Why are people like Cheney and the neocon gang not equally suspect?