Since the the OP of Russell's thread has NOTHING to do with the north side claim or the witnesses I will address his response to each witness one by one with their own thread so the discussion will not get to convoluted.

We'll start with Edward Paik just like Russell did.

Russell said:

Aldo is the one who TOLD RUSSELL in advance about A-1 Auto and how CIT wanted to go there. Russell rushed there just before the plane landed with Aldo & Craig on it and found Shinki, the brother who did NOT see the plane. Russell did NOT "discover" Edward; Shinki told CIT all about Edward and together everyone all went to the different auto shop further in the city where Edward was working at the time.

Why Pickering would lie like this when we all have a copy of the interview I do not know.

Pickering was the one who led Edward as it is apparent that Edward describes the EXACT SAME flight path and has the plane closer to his shop than the VDOT just as he did in the interview in The PentaCon but Russell tried leading him back to the VDOT antenna.

Watch Craig, Aldo, Russell, and Dylan all interview Edward Paik during our first interview in front of a DIFFERENT auto shop from where he saw the plane here:

Edward Paik's first interview Aug 2006


Obviously he did NOT "see" it hit the antenna (because it wasn't hit) and he thought it almost hit the Navy Annex meaning it was headed north of the citgo. Clearly Craig did not coach him because this is EXACTLY what he describes in the interview.

Images from first interview:
He describes it has having come from a "little bit left" of the Sheraton:


And crossing over the street to almost hit the last building of the Navy Annex.


Here he is describing the exact same thing during CIT's interview on location....
Coming from here:


Going this way:

Which matches ALL of his illustrations.




How DARE Pickering accuse CIT of "coaching" him when he has this original footage proving Edward described the same flight path and incorrectly deduced that that antenna was hit.

This is a blatant and pathetically transparent smear attempt and we will continue to expose him for his malicious, deceptive, relentless, and completely erroneous attacks against us.

Regardless of how Russell thinks it SHOULD have been done Edward described THE SAME flight path in both interviews. Crossing over from the south to the north of Columbia pike at an angle, almost hitting the roof of the buildings in front of the shop, and thinking it would hit the Navy Annex.

NOTHING CHANGED.

He admitted he did NOT see the plane hit the antenna and only incorrectly deduced that it must have because they were working on it the next day.

Because of this and also because of his English and the fact that we were not on location and nobody had images for him to draw on his first account of the flight path was simply left ambiguous.

Craig cleared it up 100% and it's obvious now that both of his accounts match.

He drew the flight path the same all 3 times just like he DESCRIBES the flight path the same in both interviews.

You are deceptively trying to sew confusion and cast doubt on the interview even though CIT reported the exact same thing.

Listen to how Pickering has no problem COMPLETELY FABRICATING lies and justifying it by ADMITTING that it's merely his "opinion".

The north side claim is the ONLY thing CIT is touting as "proof" of inside job and we have released all information in this regard.

The additional interviews aren't as critical and there is ZERO difference from us waiting to release them with RE as there is with Dylan keeping interviews secret that are in FC.

This is more of Pickering desperately trying to maliciously cast doubt on CIT personally or our motives.

He places the plane crossing over to the north side of Columbia Pike. This fatally contradicts the physical damage flight path and puts the plane right on course for north of the citgo! OF COURSE he corroborates the north side claim.

Because they weren't in a position to see it. But your bud Mike Walter reports one! And so does Penny Elgas. And so does CIT's latest north side witness and he had a PERFECT view of the bank!

It was already asked in the first interview and that has now been released so there you go.

CIT was concentrating on the flight path.

If you guys haven't watched it yet check out the first Edward Paik interview:

Watch interview here.

At the time his account of the flight path was ambiguous but in light of my follow up interview it is quite clear that he describes it exactly the same both times.

First interview:




2nd interview:




Clearly he corroborates the north side claim 100% both times.

How come this Pickering character has not been banned from this forum? If outright lying is not against the Forum rules, then it should be.

I must admit that it seems Edward describes the same flight path in both interviews. It is strange how he thinks the plane could have hit the VDOT antenna even though that's not what he saw but he clearly has the plane crossing over to the north side and almost hitting the last building of the Navy Annex in both interviews.

Edward explains why he believed the plane hit the antenna. He didn't see it hit, but deduced that it must have hit because he saw people repairing the antenna the next day and the plane was flying very low. This should have no bearing on the fact that he witnessed the plane travel north of Citgo.

Ironically, mistaken deduction may have also played a role in witnesses claiming the plane hit the pentagon. Did they visually see the plane go into the Pentagon prior to the fireball? Or are they deducing just like Edward that it must have hit because what else would have caused the fireball?