Title: More Odditites In The Generator/fence Saga.
Description: Why move the fence for less room?
Description: Why move the fence for less room?
Craig Ranke CIT - August 18, 2007 05:02 PM (GMT)
The fence surrounding the generator trailer was moved after April 2000.
This image from Sept 7 2001 shows you where the obliterated construction office and storage trailers were located and how the fence was on 9/11.
Here they are again:
Here is another good shot to show what the fence was like on 9/11. You can even see what looks to be a "groove" in the top of the generator already:
But on this shot from April 2000 the fence was quite a bit further to the left!
This demonstrates how they oddly went to all the trouble to move the fence to give them less room and open up space for their flight path.
The fence was clearly moved in accordance to their plans to simulate the physical damage.
The ridge that juts out from the building is a good point of reference to tell.
This image from Sept 7 2001 shows you where the obliterated construction office and storage trailers were located and how the fence was on 9/11.
Here they are again:
Here is another good shot to show what the fence was like on 9/11. You can even see what looks to be a "groove" in the top of the generator already:
But on this shot from April 2000 the fence was quite a bit further to the left!
This demonstrates how they oddly went to all the trouble to move the fence to give them less room and open up space for their flight path.
The fence was clearly moved in accordance to their plans to simulate the physical damage.
The ridge that juts out from the building is a good point of reference to tell.
TxGuy - August 18, 2007 05:21 PM (GMT)
I don't follow. If you claim the fence was moved that is fine but I really don't see the point. If you are claiming (see the difference) the fence was moved for nefarious reasons you have to provide evidence. You didn't do that.
Craig Ranke CIT - August 18, 2007 06:03 PM (GMT)
I understand that official story supporters will write off all oddities and suspicious details as insignificant.
That is why I made this thread in the LC Pentagon forum instead of over at jref.
It has already been demonstrated quite well in this thread how the physical damage to the trailer does not add up.
People who research the information are interested in all details.
That is why I made this thread in the LC Pentagon forum instead of over at jref.
It has already been demonstrated quite well in this thread how the physical damage to the trailer does not add up.
People who research the information are interested in all details.
TxGuy - August 18, 2007 06:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Craig Ranke CIT @ Aug 18 2007, 12:03 PM) |
| I understand that official story supporters will write off all oddities and suspicious details as insignificant. That is why I made this thread in the LC Pentagon forum instead of over at jref. It has already been demonstrated quite well in this thread how the physical damage to the trailer does not add up. People who research the information are interested in all details. |
Nobody or should I say the guy who responded to you is writing anything off. I am saying they moved a fence. Ok you provided evidence of that but to make the claim that it was moved for nefarious reasons is totally baseless and it is an assumption. If you want to believe it that's fine but it doesn't make it true unless you provide evidence. Do you have to assume everybody that doesn't buy your assumptions is being combative?