Title: Radar Conflicts
Description: bite on this
UnderTow - August 10, 2007 08:55 PM (GMT)
This should be right up someone's line of work.
Found a new picture of the "radar" while searching somewhere.
ABC News, 20/20 Oct 2001

COMPARE
National Geo, "Seconds from Impact"

(this is the snip from the video and I drew a line over the track they showed)
HELLO?!?! More fabricated and totally conflicting shit.
UnderTow - August 11, 2007 03:26 AM (GMT)
Raven should be all over this..
Two videos of the same radar track. One appears NTSB, the other going in between the Pentagon and P56 'down the river'.
I don't know how National Geographic Society sourced their radar video, but the 20/20 screen looks much more authentic. A studied eye may be able to see something in the other markings on the screen. (?)
Is one real, are both real*, are both fake. I assume the E4B has it's own radar.
Where is the radar from Reagon National, or Andrews, or anyplace.
~~~
*
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/11/...ain310721.shtmlTHE PENTAGON,
Sept. 21, 2001(CBS)
New radar evidence obtained by CBS News strongly suggests that the hijacked jetliner which crashed into the Pentagon
hit its intended target. But,.,.
..Top government officials <say>...headed for the White House and possibly circled the Capitol building.
Bob Orr(CBS) reports that's
not what the
recorded flight path shows.
Ari Fleischer(WH) saw it a different way. "That is
not the
radar data that we have seen,"
RedDawn - August 11, 2007 03:39 AM (GMT)
Go ask Colin Scoggins. You know who he is, right?
He posts as "CheapShot" at JREF.
UnderTow - August 11, 2007 03:51 AM (GMT)
Thanks for the name.
~~~
Boston Center's military liaison, Colin Scoggins, a civilian manager,
Scoggins, the go-to guy at Boston Center for all things military,
...
At Boston Center, Colin Scoggins has spotted a low-flying airliner six miles southeast of the White House.
9:35:41
ROUNTREE: Huntress [call sign for NEADS] ID, Rountree, can I help you?
BOSTON CENTER (Scoggins): Latest report, [low-flying] aircraft six miles southeast of the White House.
ROUNTREE: Six miles southeast of the White House?
BOSTON CENTER (Scoggins): Yup. East - he's moving away?
ROUNTREE: Southeast from the White House.
BOSTON CENTER (Scoggins): Air - aircraft is moving away.
ROUNTREE: Moving away from the White House?
BOSTON CENTER (Scoggins): Yeah. …
ROUNTREE: Deviating away. You don't have a type aircraft, you don't know who he is -
BOSTON CENTER (Scoggins): Nothing, nothing. We're over here in Boston so I have no clue. That - hopefully somebody in Washington would have better - information for you.
PLAY | STOP
~~
Would that be the right guy you're talking about?
RedDawn - August 11, 2007 04:06 AM (GMT)
Yes, Scoggins.
The guy that actually worked at Boston Center as the Military "specialist" on 9-11. He still works there today in the same capacity.
Even DRG gave him some nice props and conceded his expertise in his acknowledgement page in his newest book...though recognizing he is not an "inside job" believer.
But, of course, you guys have Robin Horndon. The guy that last worked as a controller in 1981. Thats's 26 years ago...
Hmmm, which should I put more credence in...?
UnderTow - August 11, 2007 04:13 AM (GMT)
Funny, I didn't realize there was some gay team sport going on here. Is this mentality part of some kind of bizarre training the JREF puts you through?
I don't know who DRG is. And what is this book you speak of.
RedDawn - August 11, 2007 04:30 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (UnderTow @ Aug 10 2007, 11:13 PM) |
Funny, I didn't realize there was some gay team sport going on here. Is this mentality part of some kind of bizarre training the JREF puts you through?
I don't know who DRG is. And what is this book you speak of. |
I thought David Ray Griffin's "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" was the new truther bible.
You need to get out more...
http://www.amazon.com/Debunking-11-Mechani...y/dp/156656686X
Craig Ranke CIT - August 11, 2007 04:36 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (RedDawn @ Aug 11 2007, 04:30 AM) |
I thought David Ray Griffin's "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" was the new truther bible.
You need to get out more...
|
If you think that and even go so far as to use that hollow vitriolic rhetoric it's clear YOU need to get out more.
How anyone could be so obsessed with people they deem to be "kooks" I will never know.
UnderTow - August 11, 2007 04:48 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (UnderTow @ Aug 10 2007, 11:26 PM) |
Raven should be all over this..
Two videos of the same radar track. One appears NTSB, the other going in between the Pentagon and P56 'down the river'.
I don't know how National Geographic Society sourced their radar video, but the 20/20 screen looks much more authentic. A studied eye may be able to see something in the other markings on the screen. (?)
Is one real, are both real*, are both fake. I assume the E4B has it's own radar. Where is the radar from Reagon National, or Andrews, or anyplace.
~~~ * http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/11/...ain310721.shtml
THE PENTAGON, Sept. 21, 2001 (CBS) New radar evidence obtained by CBS News strongly suggests that the hijacked jetliner which crashed into the Pentagon hit its intended target. But,.,. ..Top government officials <say>...headed for the White House and possibly circled the Capitol building. Bob Orr(CBS) reports that's not what the recorded flight path shows. Ari Fleischer(WH) saw it a different way. "That is not the radar data that we have seen," |
Well, I guess we can go back to topic then. Since RedDawn played himself out of the game.
JackD - August 11, 2007 06:57 AM (GMT)
.,,, so, Ari Fleischer, what radar data did YOU see?
RedDawn - August 12, 2007 04:37 PM (GMT)
Scoggins (CheapShot) is posting at JREF this morning.
As I said before, why don't you guys go ask HIM?
UnderTow - August 14, 2007 03:35 AM (GMT)
What do you think I should ask him? (I'll really try not to dwell on the whole CheapShot handle either, really :> )
Or, in your experience, what type of insight do you think he'll have on this topic?