Title: Nist Status Update On Wtc7
Description: expects to release by the end of ´07
MRGreeny74 - July 26, 2007 02:59 PM (GMT)
NIST Status Update on World Trade Center 7 Investigation
A team of scientists and engineers at the Commerce Department's National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) that is investigating the collapse of New York City's World Trade Center 7 (WTC 7) building expects to release its draft report for public comment by the end of the year. WTC 7 was a 47-story office building adjacent to the WTC towers (WTC 1 and 2) that collapsed following the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. WTC 7 collapsed later that afternoon.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/wtc_062907.html
MRGreeny74 - July 26, 2007 03:01 PM (GMT)
WTF, this thread even exist. PLEASE CLOSE, thank´s ! my fault, i´m sorry <_< !
bizcocho - July 27, 2007 12:18 AM (GMT)
This would be funny if it wasn't so tragic.
CDbeliever - August 10, 2007 01:42 AM (GMT)
"This hypothesis may be supported or modified, or new hypotheses may be developed, through the course of the continuing investigation. NIST also is considering whether hypothetical blast events could have played a role in initiating the collapse. While NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event, NIST would like to determine the magnitude of hypothetical blast scenarios that could have led to the structural failure of one or more critical elements. "
They say they are considering hypothetical blast events but of course they say they have no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition. I guess looking exactly like a standard controlled demolition and completely different than a building falling apart because of an asymetrical fire isn't evidence. Anyways, didn't they clean up all scrap metal from this building right away without forensics being done. Well, maybe the evidence is where they sent it, in China! What a joke, "no evidence". They can't use the reasoning that they had to get all the steel removed because of the entrapped people...... All the people were out of there! If they didn't remove the steel, they'd have actual physical evidence. But now that they removed all the evidence they say "NIST has found no evidence of a blast or controlled demolition event". With the steel gone video evidence is all there is. It's frustrating that they can get away with this.
Halifax - August 22, 2007 08:25 AM (GMT)
Why doesn't NIST create a model suggesting controlled demolition instead of continuing to regurgitate their fire caused a major support column to give way lie? That B.S. line is getting old. CD model would fit perfectly with the video evidence.
It amazes me how not only respected organizations have become corrupt and criminals, but also that people are foolish enough to believe their lies.
You deniers are destroying America whether you realize it or not. Maybe you think you're safe in your own little world or your GS-10 will protect you from government tyranny, but it won't. Unless you're a mover and shaker or filthy rich, you will be relegated to serf status making a crap wage and struggling to make ends meet. That's your future. The truthers are trying to expose government crimes so they will face justice and be removed from power and save America. And you deniers demonize truthers and call them names? WTF is a matter with you?
Elder4Truth - August 28, 2007 01:02 AM (GMT)
Gee, what's taking NIST so long? Jerome Hauer, and even the man in the street, knew within the hour what the official line would be on what caused the World Trade Center buildings demises!
See how the "official story" was planted here.
miragememories - August 28, 2007 05:57 PM (GMT)
The NIST WTC7 Collapse Report was probably completed long ago and the current government wants it held back.
It's release is probably being delayed because it's not expected to be 'well received'.
If there is a big event (as in 9/11-type) between now and it's end of the year scheduled release date, it'll likely get little attention.
When you consider how many people are supposedly working for NIST and subcontracted by NIST, it's interesting how well they keep a secret.
When you consider how many people were supposedly involved in creating 9/11, it's interesting how well they keep a secret.
It's interesting how skeptics find it hard to believe that large group of people responsible for a major public event are capable of keeping a secret.
Food for thought.
MM