Title: 100% Demolition
Terrorcell - July 24, 2007 03:30 AM (GMT)
thehighwaymanq - July 24, 2007 03:34 AM (GMT)
That's a fantastic video, cleary show C.D. Oh and TC, your gonna crazy with those myspace bulletins, I'm lovin it!
Terrorcell - July 24, 2007 03:51 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (thehighwaymanq @ Jul 24 2007, 03:34 AM) |
| That's a fantastic video, cleary show C.D. Oh and TC, your gonna crazy with those myspace bulletins, I'm lovin it! |
thanks!
yeah im a little more pissed than normal tonight at these bastards....i just cant believe the world we live in and whats really going on in this country and how many people still don't see it? im not going to continue my rant here though..... :lol:
e^n - July 24, 2007 04:23 AM (GMT)
I've always wondered, what is the most popular theory about what these 'squibs' actually are? I mean I know they're explosive ejections but are they explosives on core columns or perimeter columns or what? It seems that they cause no visible external change and there's only a few of them per side so I am not entirely sure what the popular theory is :(
Terrorcell - July 24, 2007 04:25 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (e^n @ Jul 24 2007, 04:23 AM) |
| I've always wondered, what is the most popular theory about what these 'squibs' actually are? I mean I know they're explosive ejections but are they explosives on core columns or perimeter columns or what? It seems that they cause no visible external change and there's only a few of them per side so I am not entirely sure what the popular theory is :( |
you need to watch it again. charges are running up it at a vertical angle. slicing them....like the pics you see of the sliced columns....
go watch it
chucksheen - July 24, 2007 04:32 AM (GMT)
miragememories - July 24, 2007 03:37 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (e^n @ Jul 24 2007, 12:23 AM) |
| I've always wondered, what is the most popular theory about what these 'squibs' actually are? I mean I know they're explosive ejections but are they explosives on core columns or perimeter columns or what? It seems that they cause no visible external change and there's only a few of them per side so I am not entirely sure what the popular theory is :( |
Your posts clearly indicate you spend little time "wondering" and that you are convinced those explosive squibs are all due to air pressure created by the upper building collapse. As usual you pose an innocent sounding setup question in preparation for attacking the expected reply.
As I've said before, we see relatively few squibs because that was the intention of the those that planned the demolition. The plan was to undermine the core, but hide the cause (visible squibs) as much as possible so that the controlled demolition could be deniable.
With the core strategically compromised, it wasn't necessary to attack the perimeter which would have created too many unexplainable observables for NIST to dismiss.
Nice job Terrorcell.
MM
Terrorcell - July 24, 2007 04:53 PM (GMT)
You most likely won't hear back from him on this thread and if you do it will most likely be unrelated.
Anyone watching that video can see as clear as day that there are diagonal charges going off. You watch them. They work their way up the building on an angle. This is 100% Solid Concrete Visual Evidence of a Demolition.
Show this footage to any "demo expert" and ask them to explain the diagonal patterns without calling it a demolition. They'll be speechless!
Anyone watching that video can see as clear as day that there are diagonal charges going off. You watch them. They work their way up the building on an angle. This is 100% Solid Concrete Visual Evidence of a Demolition.
Show this footage to any "demo expert" and ask them to explain the diagonal patterns without calling it a demolition. They'll be speechless!
SPreston - July 24, 2007 08:08 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (miragememories) | ||
Your posts clearly indicate you spend little time "wondering" and that you are convinced those explosive squibs are all due to air pressure created by the upper building collapse. As usual you pose an innocent sounding setup question in preparation for attacking the expected reply. As I've said before, we see relatively few squibs because that was the intention of the those that planned the demolition. The plan was to undermine the core, but hide the cause (visible squibs) as much as possible so that the controlled demolition could be deniable. With the core strategically compromised, it wasn't necessary to attack the perimeter which would have created too many unexplainable observables for NIST to dismiss. Nice job Terrorcell. MM |
| QUOTE (Terrorcell) |
| You most likely won't hear back from him on this thread and if you do it will most likely be unrelated. Anyone watching that video can see as clear as day that there are diagonal charges going off. You watch them. They work their way up the building on an angle. This is 100% Solid Concrete Visual Evidence of a Demolition. Show this footage to any "demo expert" and ask them to explain the diagonal patterns without calling it a demolition. They'll be speechless! |
Another link to the video
911 WTC DEMOLITION SEQUENCE FINALLY REVEALED
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX9gdRST6zM
einsteen - July 26, 2007 07:16 PM (GMT)
Ok, as some might know I don't believe the official story and also not that air is responsible for that, but for me it doesn't make sense, they should go from top to down. Of course if there are a lot of charges there is a statistically a high risk that some of them are interchanged (the sequence if they are remotely controlled) but physically I would say that only a top-down implosion would lead to the observed collapse. I'm still working on it... I wish I had more time.