RON PAUL PREDICTS FALSE FLAG TERRORISM

Republican presidential candidate, Rep. Ron Paul, said the country is in "great danger" of the U.S. government staging a terrorist attack or a Gulf of Tonkin style provocation, as the war in Iraq continues to deteriorate.

The Texas congressman offered no specifics nor mentioned President Bush by name, but he clearly insinuated that the administration would not be above staging an incident to revive flagging support.

"We're in danger in many ways," Paul said on the Alex Jones radio show. "The attack on our civil liberties here at home, the foreign policy that's in shambles and our obligations overseas and commitment which endangers our troops and our national defense."

Paul was asked to respond to comments by anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan that the U.S. is in danger of a staged terror attack or a provocation of an enemy similar to the Gulf of Tonkin incident in 1964 before the Vietnam War.

During the radio interview, Paul said the government was conducting "an orchestrated effort to blame the Iranians for everything that has gone wrong in Iraq."

The comments come as several prominent terrorism experts have warned the U.S. is facing an increased risk of attack this summer. Earlier this week, in an interview with the Chicago Tribune, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff said he had a "gut feeling" the U.S. would be attacked again.

The remark angered some Democrats, who criticized Chertoff for being too vague. And some pundits seized on his remarks, saying the vague warnings were meant only to revive flagging support for the war in Iraq and Bush’s larger war against terrorism.

July 12, 2007: Ron Paul warns of staged terror attacks on the Alex Jones Show - MP3 4:15 - 500K (audio)

My Webpage...and what does he say about regime plans to restore the draft when the war escalates?My Webpage

IF RON PAUL WANTS TO GET ELECTED, HE NEEDS TO ATTEND THIS MEETING :

he IFOU represents 26,000 workers across Iraq. They have struck three times against the privatisation of Iraqi oil and have forced the Prime Minister Nouri Al Maliki to negotiate with them. Despite this, the IFOU is still an illegal organisation.

Hassan has spoken out against the occupation of Iraq and the controversial Hydrocarbon Law, which will see much of Iraq’s oil wealth fall into the hands of foreign oil companies.
Of the new oil law Hassan said 'The privatisation of the oil and industrial sectors is the objective of all in the Iraqi state/government. We will stand firm against this imperialist plan that would hand over Iraq's wealth to international capitalism such that the deprived Iraqi people would not benefit from it…Iraqis are capable of managing their companies and their investments by themselves’ Hear him speak about the strikes, the situation in Iraq and how and why we must end the occupation. 7pm, Wednesday 18th July, Friends Meeting House, Euston Road, NW1.

U.S. Politics
Antiwar Ron Paul Rakes in Military Donations?

Quarterly Reports Indicate Paul Raised More From Military Than Other Republicans
07/16/2007 4:24 PM ET
Simi Valley, UNITED STATES: Arizona Senator John McCain (L), Rep. Ron Paul of Texas and Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani ® participate in the first GOP Candidates's debate of the 2008 Presidential Race, at the Reagan Presidential Library in Simi
Gabriel Buoys/AFP/Getty
Simi Valley, UNITED STATES: Arizona Senator John McCain (L), Rep. Ron Paul of Texas and Former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani ® participate in the first GOP Candidates's debate of the 2008 Presidential Race, at the Reagan Presidential Library in Simi

Congressman Ron Paul has defined his Republican presidential candidacy with a staunchly critical stance on the Iraq war, saying during the June 5 debate in New Hampshire, for example, that it was a "mistake to go and a mistake to stay."

Paul has often reiterated his views that US security has been worsened by its military presence in Iraq, and that Bush's pre-emptive war doctrine represented one of his administration's greatest moral failings.

One might think such criticism of the war and the Commander-in-Chief's leadership would make Paul a pariah to the military community, however, the latest figures indicate the antiwar Republican is receiving more donations from employees of the US military than any other Republican candidate.

The Presidential campaigns just released their quarterly campaign finance reports, leaving much of the mainstream media remarking on Paul's surge in online donations from his healthy Internet following, though the $2.3 million he raised still has him trailing far behind the front runners.

But a closer look at the reports reveals a less obvious but more remarkable development--the antiwar Republican received nearly 50% of the money donated by employees of the US military.

The site that crunched the numbers on the quarterly reports did not count donations coming from the US Marine Corps, which adds $1600 to the total of $15,825 total they report McCain raised from employees of the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Veterans Administration. That failure slightly alters the conclusions they draw on the totals, since Paul received no money from Marines. Even so, the overall percentages indicate that the underdog candidate, whose overall fund raising cache is dwarfed by the leading pack of candidates, has appealed to segments of the military community.

U.S. Military | U.S. Government | Congress Email This Post

Conyers: 3 More and I'll Impeach
House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers has said that if three more Congress Members sign Kucinich's impeachment bill, he will start the impeachment proceedings. (The story was broken tonight by After Downing Street).

Remember, criminal proceedings against Bush, Cheney and others for 9/11 cannot start until they are out of office. Impeachment is the first step.

EVERYONE should call their congressional representatives (especially if yours' are not one of the signatories to Kucinich's impeachment bill) and DEMAND they co-sign. Click here to find your congress person.

posted by George Washington at 11:15 PM 0 comments

NATIONAL LEADERS AND ACTIVISTS, WE ARE GOING IN ANYWAY ...

In spite of a new executive order, the increased fear-mongering about "terrorist attacks," including Chertoff's repeated messages from his gut and Santorum's apparent pining for "unfortunate events," the real America is making it clear we've had enough! A group of national leaders and activists are literally marching into Washington DC on Monday, straight to Conyers' office, to sit there until he agrees to immediately push impeachment forward. Details follow.

Conyers has now said if three more Representatives sign on to cosponsor House Resolution 333, he'll push it forward. Has your Rep signed on? Have you called today? Can you join these marchers? If not, how will you support their actions on Monday?

This is only one of a whole series of actions taking place, and we are compiling a list of these examples of continuing resistance, to be posted shortly. In the meantime, take action, and take heart! We are the People! We will not be silent!

RON PAUL IS THE ONLY CANDIDATE WILLING TO TELL AMERICANS THE WAY IT IS :

THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND NATO PRACTICING TERRORISM ?
Former NSA Director: "By any measure the US has long used terrorism"
Has the U.S. Government ever used terror?
george washington's blog

Well, the New York Times has documented that Iranians working for the C.I.A. in the 1950's posed as Communists and staged bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its democratically-elected president.

And, as confirmed by a former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence, NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and blamed the communists, in order to rally people's support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: "You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security."

Moreover, recently declassified documents show that in the 1960's, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a plan to blow up AMERICAN airplanes (using an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also to commit terrorist acts on American soil, and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of Cuba. If you view no other links in this article, please read the following ABC news report; the official documents; and watch this interviewwith the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings (click link entitled "Joint Chiefs Guilty-Northwoods").

In addition, the FBI had penetrated the cell which carried out the 1993 world trade center bombing, but had -- at the last minute -- cancelled the plan to have its FBI infiltrator substitute fake power for real explosives, against the infiltrator's strong wishes (summary version is free; full version is pay-per-view).

And the anthrax attacks -- which were sent along with notes purportedly written by Islamic terrorists -- used a weaponized anthrax strain from the top U.S. bioweapons facility, the Fort Detrick military base. Indeed, top bioweapons experts have stated that the anthrax attack may have been a CIA test "gone wrong"; and see this article by a former NSA and naval intelligence officer. It is also interesting that the only congress people mailed anthrax-containing letters were key democrats, and that the attacks occurred one week before passage of the freedom-curtailing Patriot Act, which seems to have scared them and the rest of congress into passing that act without even reading it. And it might be coincidence, but White House staff began taking the anti-anthrax medicine before the Anthrax attacks occurred.

Even the former director of the National Security Agency said "By any measure the US has long used terrorism. In `78-79 the Senate was trying to pass a law against international terrorism - in every version they produced, the lawyers said the US would be in violation"(the audio is here).
TIME TO CHANGE THE FLAg

if we cant settle for one flag, then maybe we should display ALL
of the territories we now occupy, to name a few...

speech by general george washington

"But her mission will not then be finished; for ere another century shall have gone by, the oppressors of the whole earth, hating and envying her exaltation, shall join themselves together to raise up their hands against her. But if she still be found worthy of her high calling they shall surely be discomfitted, and then will be ended her third and last great struggle for existence. Thence-forth shall the Republic go on, increasing in power and goodness, until her borders shall end only in the remotest corners of the earth, and the whole earth shall beneath her shadowing wing become a Universal Republic. Let her in her prosperity, however remember the Lord her God, her trust be always in Him, and she shall never be confounded."

Ron Paul is just another piece of the political engine that keeps entertained the American populace. Has he ever publicly declared that he will authorize a new and independent investigation regarding the events of 9/11 if becomes president of the United States? If the answer is NO, then Congressman Ron Paul should consider the idea of making his own comic show.

Well Ron is RIGHT!, He does not have all the Facts.



• 9/11 - As an airplane approaches Washington D.C. area, a young man enters the Presidential Emergency Operating Center (PEOC) where Vice President Cheney and Transportation Sect. Norman Mineta are at and tells Cheney, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out. The plane is 10 miles out," and then asks him "Do the orders still stand?" in which Cheney turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
PANEL 1: SEPTEMBER 11, 2001: THE ATTACKS AND THE RESPONSE; WITNESSES: SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION NORMAN MINETA
"MR. HAMILTON: We thank you for that. I wanted to focus just a moment on the Presidential Emergency Operating Center. You were there for a good part of the day. I think you were there with the vice president. And when you had that order given, I think it was by the president, that authorized the shooting down of commercial aircraft that were suspected to be controlled by terrorists, were you there when that order was given?
MR. MINETA: No, I was not. I was made aware of it during the time that the airplane coming into the Pentagon. There was a young man who had come in and said to the vice president, "The plane is 50 miles out. The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to, "The plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the vice president, "Do the orders still stand?" And the vice president turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?" Well, at the time I didn't know what all that meant. And --
MR. HAMILTON: The flight you're referring to is the --
MR. MINETA: The flight that came into the Pentagon.
MR. HAMILTON: The Pentagon, yeah." - 9/11 Commission (05/23/03) [Video]

(See also: 9/11 - Cheney directs the U.S. government's response from the PEOC; June 23, 2006 - Norman Mineta resigns one day after Jim Fetzer tells Hannity & Colmes about his 9/11 Commission testimony)



• 9/11 (9:37:46 am) - Flight 77 is said to have crashed right in the middle of the only renovated section of the Pentagon being renovated to bolster it against an attack traveling at 530 mph, which at the time this section housed the fewest people in the entire building, important budget information was located in the damaged area, the attack came near the end of the fiscal year, and a large number of those killed there were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts.
"At 9:37, the west wall of the Pentagon was hit by hijacked American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757. The crash caused immediate and catastrophic damage. All 64 people aboard the airliner were killed, as were 125 people inside the Pentagon (70 civilians and 55 military service members)." - 9/11 Commission
"At 9:37:46, American Airlines Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon, traveling at approximately 530 miles per hour." - 9/11 Commission [local]
Pentagon repairs to cost $700 million
"Luck — if it can be called that — had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion's reach."
"The reconstruction is expected to cost over $700 million and take until spring 2003." - USA Today (01/01/02)

Installation hosts briefing on initial response to Pentagon attack
"Schwartz explained that renovations on the Pentagon began several years earlier and were nearing completion, particularly the section called Wedge 1, when the crash occurred.
He said the plane struck the building almost in the middle of the space where the renovation had been completed. Personnel had not completely reoccupied this area of the building.
"This contributed to the relatively low number of casualties," Schwartz said. "The number could have been far greater had the plane struck another portion of the building not affected by the renovation." - Fort Meade/Army
Arlington County After-Action Report on the Response to the September 11 Terrorist Attack on the Pentagon
"The impact area included both the Navy operations center and the office complex of the National Guard and Army Reserve. It was also the end of the fiscal year and important budget information was in the damaged area." - Arlington County After-Action Report

Army unit piecing together accounts of Pentagon attack
"Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck." - South Coast Today/Pittsburgh Post-Gazette (12/20/01)
(See also: September 10, 2001 - Donald Rumsfeld announces the Pentagon lost track of $2.3 trillion dollars; 9/11 - Within minutes of the explosion at the Pentagon, the FBI confiscates security videos that had captured the crash from a nearby gas station and hotel; March 7, 2002 - A set of five frames taken from a Pentagon security camera that supposedly shows Flight 77 crashing into it are released; Killtown's: Did Flight 77 really crash into the Pentagon? & Pentagon fatalities)

THE PENTAGON WAS NOT HIT BY MISSLE, BOEING REMOTE !

• 9/11 - All the alleged hijacked planes that supposedly hit their targets flew in tilting to the left.



(Left pic - Flight 11 into the WTC 1; Center pic - Flight 175 into the WTC 2; Right pic - Flight 77 into the Pentagon.)
I can not get the pictures on this forum, if anyone wants pictures of the PLANE HITTING THE PENTAGON, email me, and send them to you!


Our skate boarder filming Himself shot the pictures of the plane and tail section sticking out of the Pentagon.

While talking about Ron Paul remember, America needs more than just a new investigation and he's the only one I hear addressing these issues.

I agree. I can also see how Ron Paul may confuse wanna be converts. He is a new face to most of us. I like him for the spot but i would also fear for his longevity,the boss aint gonna like it. :ph43r:

IVXX, could you tell sureshot Im not delibrately spamming? Im a special needs person
with a cause

Im allergic to right-wing posters,when republicans get near me, I stutter :P

~lol~ You too? Heh ...

Are you 20? 21? 18?

Let me ask you this. Are you ready with your pitchfork? Not some keyboard babbling, but honestly ready to head out the door, with definate action in mind? Not some namby-pamby banner in hand, but with a modern version of the pitchfork in tow.
I am. I'm 40 with a family to support and a lot to lose. My pitchforks are ready, and often practiced with. At this point, if I took my pitchforks out for somethng other than practice, I'd be a nutter. A nutter that would either be a snippet on the news, or a "homegrown terrorist".
It would be futile right now to do so. Perhaps the good Dr. Paul knows as much also.

I have a minor, but important problem with what you said alive,

Should that word above which I bolded and enlarged not be terrorized ?

[/QUOTE]

that too, my fine-feathered friend, two/quote/turkeytrax?

must have scared the CRAP out of them B)

Vote for me, Ron Paul, the kinder gentler NWO.

Ron Paul supporters are gullible suckers of the most laughable variety.

:lol: then tell me, who is your favorite candidate ? Im leaning toward bill and hillary

NOW EVERYTHING RON PAUL HAS BEEN SAYING JUST CAME OUT IN A REPORT

Learn from the fall of Rome, US warned
By Jeremy Grant in Washington

Published: August 14 2007 00:06 | Last updated: August 14 2007 00:06

The US government is on a ‘burning platform’ of unsustainable policies and practices with fiscal deficits, chronic healthcare underfunding, immigration and overseas military commitments threatening a crisis if action is not taken soon, the country’s top government inspector has warned.

David Walker, comptroller general of the US, issued the unusually downbeat assessment of his country’s future in a report that lays out what he called “chilling long-term simulations”.

These include “dramatic” tax rises, slashed government services and the large-scale dumping by foreign governments of holdings of US debt.

Drawing parallels with the end of the Roman empire, Mr Walker warned there were “striking similarities” between America’s current situation and the factors that brought down Rome, including “declining moral values and political civility at home, an over-confident and over-extended military in foreign lands and fiscal irresponsibility by the central government”.

“Sound familiar?” Mr Walker said. “In my view, it’s time to learn from history and take steps to ensure the American Republic is the first to stand the test of time.”

Mr Walker’s views carry weight because he is a non-partisan figure in charge of the Government Accountability Office, often described as the investigative arm of the US Congress.

While most of its studies are commissioned by legislators, about 10 per cent – such as the one containing his latest warnings – are initiated by the comptroller general himself.

In an interview with the Financial Times, Mr Walker said he had mentioned some of the issues before but now wanted to “turn up the volume”. Some of them were too sensitive for others in government to “have their name associated with”.

“I’m trying to sound an alarm and issue a wake-up call,” he said. “As comptroller general I’ve got an ability to look longer-range and take on issues that others may be hesitant, and in many cases may not be in a position, to take on.

“One of the concerns is obviously we are a great country but we face major sustainability challenges that we are not taking seriously enough,” said Mr Walker, who was appointed during the Clinton administration to the post, which carries a 15-year term.

The fiscal imbalance meant the US was “on a path toward an explosion of debt”.

“With the looming retirement of baby boomers, spiralling healthcare costs, plummeting savings rates and increasing reliance on foreign lenders, we face unprecedented fiscal risks,” said Mr Walker, a former senior executive at PwC auditing firm.

Current US policy on education, energy, the environment, immigration and Iraq also was on an “unsustainable path”.

“Our very prosperity is placing greater demands on our physical infrastructure. Billions of dollars will be needed to modernise everything from highways and airports to water and sewage systems. The recent bridge collapse in Minneapolis was a sobering wake-up call.”

Mr Walker said he would offer to brief the would-be presidential candidates next spring.

“They need to make fiscal responsibility and inter-generational equity one of their top priorities. If they do, I think we have a chance to turn this around but if they don’t, I think the risk of a serious crisis rises considerably”.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007