View Full Version: Detailed Analysis Of All The Phone Calls

Loose Change Forum > Flight 93 > Detailed Analysis Of All The Phone Calls



Title: Detailed Analysis Of All The Phone Calls
Description: huge and unexplainable contradictions


John Doe II - July 2, 2007 09:27 PM (GMT)
In the article « UA 93: Too many contradictions » I've already compared the details given in the different phone calls account.
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...iewtopic.php?24
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu...dress=125x23179
Since the phone animation (based on data from Verizon) was presented as official evidence at the Moussaoui trial it is much easier to pinpoint the exact contradictions as the animation provides us with the exact location of each phone call and the official claimed fact that most passengers were herded to the back of the plane before Burnett's first phone call.
http://coop.vaed.uscourts.gov/moussaoui/flights.zip

(Please note that this animation once again proves that the crash time is a lie:
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...wtopic.php?4134
and that it's very certain the animation is lying about Burnett using an airphone and not a cell phone and that the animation completely omitts Burnett's fourth phone call:
(y Andre II)
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...topic.php?3755)

Now let's have a look again at the contradictions under the view point of where exactly the phone calls were done which contradict each other.
(The number behind the passenger indicates the seat from where the phone call was done)
A detailed analysis will show that the number of contradictions is unexplainable especially if one assumes the official data is correct. But what is one left to assume if we consider the official data as a complete lie?


More here:
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...wtopic.php?4311

Woody Box - July 3, 2007 06:57 PM (GMT)
QUOTE (John Doe II @ Jul 2 2007, 09:27 PM)

A detailed analysis will show that the number of contradictions is unexplainable especially if one assumes the official data is correct. But what is one left to assume if we consider the official data as a complete lie?





MIHOP, I think, and if the existence of the phone calls is confuted, the existence of the the hijackers and the hijackings is confuted either, because the calls were always claimed to be proof for the reality of the hijackings.

I highly recommend the work of John Doe II. He's one of the best researchers we have.


Woody Box - August 9, 2007 08:48 PM (GMT)

*kick*

JackD - August 9, 2007 10:37 PM (GMT)
according to recent news disclosed by Webster Tarpley, two or three weeks before 9/11 there was a telecom response drill (i don't know who sponsored drill) of

simulated cell phone calls.

Some of the calls were to be simulated as if coming from a hijacked airplane. Again, this was just a drill, a practice, and it was apparently not happening on 9/11 itself.




Hosted for free by InvisionFree