In the article « UA 93: Too many contradictions » I've already compared the details given in the different phone calls account.
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...iewtopic.php?24http://www.democraticunderground.com/discu...dress=125x23179Since the phone animation (based on data from Verizon) was presented as official evidence at the Moussaoui trial it is much easier to pinpoint the exact contradictions as the animation provides us with the exact location of each phone call and the official claimed fact that most passengers were herded to the back of the plane before Burnett's first phone call.
http://coop.vaed.uscourts.gov/moussaoui/flights.zip(Please note that this animation once again proves that the crash time is a lie:
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...wtopic.php?4134and that it's very certain the animation is lying about Burnett using an airphone and not a cell phone and that the animation completely omitts Burnett's fourth phone call:
(y Andre II)
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...topic.php?3755)Now let's have a look again at the contradictions under the view point of where exactly the phone calls were done which contradict each other.
(The number behind the passenger indicates the seat from where the phone call was done)
A detailed analysis will show that the number of contradictions is unexplainable especially if one assumes the official data is correct. But what is one left to assume if we consider the official data as a complete lie?More here:
http://www.team8plus.org/e107_plugins/foru...wtopic.php?4311