This video is very informing:

My Webpage

Wow bro, nearly every thread in the Pentagon section has some parts about the Pentacon, it's everywhere. Just look around-

The guys who made it are on this board. Lyte Trip, Terrorcell (I think)

No, I'm not involved with the Pentacon. I'm just really good friends with Aldo (Merc).

I support their work 1000% and promote it though because I believe it to be absolute truth.

We need more people doing what they have done.

it was a great video...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5296595694237574426

http://stage6.divx.com/user/CitizenInvesti...ng-Gun-Version)

Here is a different, imo better, version with subtitles, new graphics, and an intro explanation.

how did they get the black box from a plane that never crashed?

How do you know they got a black box from a plane that never crashed? All you know is what you were told.

You think you're clever, don't you? I was waiting for you to throw your little curve ball.

hey man, im going by the movie...they claim flight 77 flew OVER the pentagon.....so, how did they get the black box out of a plane that never crashed?? all i know is what the movie told me

1. The PentaCon doesn't say anything about the black box at all other than to suggest you refer to Pilot's for Truth for information in this regard.

2. The witnesses prove the plane flew on the north side of the citgo station. That makes it impossible to hit the light poles or damage the building as outlined in the ASCE report.

3. Since the plane flew on the north side of the CITGO and can not be what caused the physical damage it proves that Lloyd the cab driver's ludicrous account has been staged.

4. If I were you I would demand answers from the NTSB as to why the black box data is anomalous and demand answers from the government as to what happened to flight 77 since we have no evidence it was ever near Arlington at all.


We have never cited the black box as proof of anything.

The black box and the witnesses are completely separate lines of inquiry from separate organizations and they do NOT match.

The important similarity between the eyewitnesses and black box data is that NEITHER match the official story but they do NOT match each other.

Get it now?

• The FDR was reportedly recovered from inside the pentagon early morning Sept 14, 2001. Almost 3 days after the attack.
• It was reportedly found near the entrance hole... *AND* the exit hole.
• It was reportedly found under the cockpit seat (FDR is in the tail section, where are the pictures of the cockpit seat?).

more information here...

http://z9.invisionfree.com/Pilots_For_Trut...?showtopic=5505

Obviously the black box did not come from the plane.

Hope this helps...

thanks!!

I\'m confused. If the black box was planted, how can pft/pentacon folks use it as evidence for anything?

Did they plant it with bad info?

Citizen Investigation Team does not use the black box to support the witness statements.

Once again.......PFT demands answers to the anomalies in the black box.

CIT has proven via eyewitness testimony that the REAL flight path does not match the physical damage.

They are completely separate lines of inquiry that both happen to contradict the official story in different ways.

But, the theories contradict each other, dont they?

I know CIT claims north of Citgo and a flyover.

But, pft says the black box (that was recovered at the Pentagon) has some anomolies with the data.

Are you guys on the same page?

How does that conflict?

How could it possibly conflict when they are completely separate lines of inquiry?

Please explain your question.

YOU say the plane flew over.

THEY say the black box was recovered at the pentagon.

So, was it both? If so, the box was planted, right?

If so, how would anything on it be of any relevance? I.E. how does one argue the data on something that is admitedly fake or planted?

WE say the plane flew over based on the eyewitness testimony.

THEY (meaning PFT) do NOT say the data supplied from the government is necessarily from the black box of flight 77 but simply demand an official response as to why the data supplied from the government is irreconcilable with their own story.

Dig?

Correct me if am wrong, but doesn't the plane fly over when PFT corrected for the altitude? If so, who's to say the data the NTSB got was a truncated version of the comma delimilted file. But, as Craig states, the point is their (Government) stories don't reconcile.

here is a question: if this black box data is true, how come it didnt show where the plane landed if it didnt crash into the pentagon?

yeah i cant imagine for the life of my why they would have taken that off of the end........... :rolleyes:

and how would they take that off?

Just like that.

:lol:

:lol:

It's funny cuz it's true!

Sweet!

.. :lol: .. :lol: ..

What is update on Pentacon.com?

Here is a good explanation of how they covered-up the flight path of Flight 77 going north of the Citgo station and up over the Pentagon during the explosion and Hollywood spectacular effects.