| QUOTE (Vii @ Jun 20 2007, 05:42 PM) |
| # No more HUD or user interface, body armor shows |
| QUOTE (Vii @ Jun 20 2007, 05:42 PM) |
| # Flamethrowers and rocket launchers are still in # Explosions are larger than ever, a mission requires creating a chain reaction of car explosions # Bullet wounds show, blood appears where you shoot people # No more eating, girlfriends, or changing body size but skills still improve # Unlockable vehicles and "plenty of goodies" at 100% completion # Better graphics than Saints Row, draw distance is as far as you can see. |
| QUOTE (Vii @ Jun 20 2007, 05:42 PM) |
# Land size is bigger than 3 cities put together from GTA: San Andreas |
| QUOTE |
| # Niko can run forever, but not as fast as before |
| QUOTE |
| # Land size is bigger than 3 cities put together from GTA: San Andreas So bigger than SA then? Then why did Sam Houser say it was smaller? |
| QUOTE |
| # Bullet wounds show, blood appears where you shoot people |
| QUOTE |
| # Vibration every footstep when you run |
| QUOTE (deep:cover @ Jun 20 2007, 04:41 PM) |
| Vibration every footstep would be awesome...if you were a Berserker from Gears of War or something.... An ordinary human doesn't stomp while he runs...especially enough to cause vibrations. I say it's fake. And I doubt Rockstar would sway away from the old GTA tradition of the HUD. |
| QUOTE (Li'l Freak @ Jun 20 2007, 06:35 PM) | ||
Oh really? I wouldn't mind having a larger city then expected. |
| QUOTE (Waterbottle @ Jun 20 2007, 04:56 PM) | ||||
Of course, a big map would be good (as long as it stays detailed), but why are every one contradicting each other? |
| QUOTE (Waterbottle @ Jun 20 2007, 04:01 PM) | ||
So bigger than SA then? Then why did Sam Houser say it was smaller? |
| QUOTE (Joshyboy @ Jun 20 2007, 08:19 PM) |
| It meens when you are running, not when you are walking! |